Resolved: On balance, the death penalty in the US does more harm than good.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 4 votes and with 13 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Resolved: On balance, the death penalty in the US does more harm than good.
Death penalty (from Merriam-Webster): death as a punishment given by a court of law for very serious crimes: capital punishment
The burden of proof is shared. PRO must prove that the death penalty in the US does more harm than good. CON must prove that the death penalty in the US does more good than harm.
Rules:
-No Kritiks
-No personal attacks
-Focus only on the death penalty in the United States
Structure:
R1: Constructive arguments (no rebuttals)
R2: Rebuttals/defense
R3: Rebuttals/defense
R3: Conclusion (no new arguments)
- Devote resources into solving cold cases
- Hire more public defenders
- Invest in rehabilitation programs
- Improve education in low-income areas
- Restructure training for police
Contention 1: The death penalty does excessive harm.A. The death penalty is immoral and a violation of human rights.
- Prison in the US is generally a caged animal design, throwing people to make each other's life hell and the most nasty and deranged of criminals would be let into the prison system if they weren't execute, increasing how cruel it is.
- Death penalty is a simple, bye-bye no more suffering solution to someone who'd spend life in prison and be a sociopath/psychopath with nothing to lose.
immoral and a violation of human rights.
Millions of Americans are incarcerated in overcrowded, violent, and inhumane jails and prisons that do not provide treatment, education, or rehabilitation. EJI is fighting for reforms that protect incarcerated people.As prison populations surged nationwide in the 1990s and conditions began to deteriorate, lawmakers made it harder for incarcerated people to file and win civil rights lawsuits in federal court and largely eliminated court oversight of prisons and jails.1
Today, prisons and jails in America are in crisis. Incarcerated people are beaten, stabbed, raped, and killed in facilities run by corrupt officials who abuse their power with impunity. People who need medical care, help managing their disabilities, mental health and addiction treatment, and suicide prevention are denied care, ignored, punished, and placed in solitary confinement. And despite growing bipartisan support for criminal justice reform, the private prison industry continues to block meaningful proposals.2Escalating Violence
The Constitution requires that prison and jail officials protect incarcerated people from physical harm and sexual assault. But facilities nationwide are failing to meet this fundamental duty, putting incarcerated people at risk of being beaten, stabbed, and raped.
Alabama’s Prisons Are Deadliest in the Nation
Over the last decade, there has been a dramatic increase in the level of violence in Alabama state prisons.Alabama’s prisons are the most violent in the nation. The U.S. Department of Justice found in a statewide investigation that Alabama routinely violates the constitutional rights of people in its prisons, where homicide and sexual abuse is common, knives and dangerous drugs are rampant, and incarcerated people are extorted, threatened, stabbed, raped, and even tied up for days without guards noticing.Serious understaffing, systemic classification failures, and official misconduct and corruption have left thousands of incarcerated individuals across Alabama and the nation vulnerable to abuse, assaults, and uncontrolled violence.3Denying Treatment
The number of incarcerated people who have a mental illness is growing across the country, raising critical questions about using prisons instead of hospitals to manage serious mental health problems.
A tragic case in New York illustrates how prisons are failing to provide adequate mental health treatment.More than half of all Americans in prison or jail have a mental illness.4 Prison officials often fail to provide appropriate treatment for people whose behavior is difficult to manage, instead resorting to physical force and solitary confinement, which can aggravate mental health problems.More than 60,000 people in the U.S. are held in solitary confinement.5 They’re isolated in small cells for 23 hours a day, allowed out only for showers, brief exercise, or medical visits, and denied calls or visits from family members. Studies show that people held in long-term solitary confinement suffer from anxiety, paranoia, perceptual disturbances, and deep depression. Nationwide, suicides among people held in isolation account for almost 50% of all prison suicides, even though less than 8% of the prison population is in isolation.6The Supreme Court signaled in 2011 that failing to provide adequate medical and mental health care to incarcerated people could result in drastic consequences for states. It found that California’s grossly inadequate medical and mental health care is “incompatible with the concept of human dignity and has no place in civilized society” and ordered the state to release up to 46,000 people from its “horrendous” prisons.7But states like Alabama continue to fall far below basic constitutional requirements. In 2017, a federal court found Alabama’s “horrendously inadequate” mental health services had led to a “skyrocketing suicide rate” among incarcerated people. The court found that prison officials don’t identify people with serious mental health needs. There’s no adequate treatment for incarcerated people who are suicidal. And Alabama prisons discipline people with mental illness, often putting them in isolation for long periods of time.Tolerating Abuse
Corruption and abuse of power among correctional staff runs rampant because prison officials are not held accountable for failing to protect incarcerated people.
The Murder of Rocrast Mack
A 24-year-old man was beaten to death by guards at Alabama’s Ventress Prison.A handful of abusive officers can engage in extreme cruelty and criminal misconduct if their supervisors look the other way. When violent correctional officers are not held accountable, a dangerous culture of impunity flourishes.The culture of impunity in Alabama, and in many other states, starts at the leadership level. The Justice Department found in 2019 that the Alabama Department of Corrections had long been aware of the unconstitutional conditions in its prisons, yet “little has changed.” In fact, the violence has gotten worse since the Justice Department announced its statewide investigation in 2016.Similarly, ADOC failed to do anything about the “toxic, sexualized environment that permit[ted] staff sexual abuse and harassment” at Tutwiler Prison for Women despite “repeated notification of the problems.”In the face of rising homicide rates, Alabama officials misrepresented causes of death and the number of homicides in the state’s prisons. The Justice Department reported that Alabama officials knew that staff were smuggling dangerous drugs into prisons. But rather than address staff corruption and illegal activity, state officials tried to hide the alarming number of drug overdose deaths in Alabama prisons by misreporting the data.Enriching Corporations
Private corrections companies are heavily invested in keeping more than two million Americans behind bars.
No Universal Decline in Mass Incarceration
Report from the Vera Institute of Justice shows “the specter of mass incarceration is alive and well.”Mass incarceration is “an expensive way to achieve less public safety.”8 It cost taxpayers almost $87 billion in 2015 for roughly the same level of public safety achieved in 1978 for $5.5 billion.9 Factoring in policing and court costs, and expenses paid by families to support incarcerated loved ones, mass incarceration costs state and federal governments and American families $182 billion each year.10Rising costs have spurred some local, state, and federal policymakers to reduce incarceration. But private corrections companies are heavily invested in keeping more than two million Americans behind bars.11The U.S. has the world’s largest private prison population.12 Private prisons house 8.2% (121,420) of the 1.5 million people in state and federal prisons.13 Private prison corporations reported revenues of nearly $4 billion in 2017.14 The private prison population is on the rise, despite growing evidence that private prisons are less safe, do not promote rehabilitation, and do not save taxpayers money.The fastest-growing incarcerated population is people detained by immigration officials.15 The federal government is increasingly relying on private, profit-based immigration detention facilities. 16 Private detention companies are paid a set fee per detainee per night, and they negotiate contracts that guarantee a minimum daily headcount, creating perverse incentives for government officials. Many run notoriously dangerous facilities with horrific conditions that operate far outside federal oversight.17Private prison companies profit from providing services at virtually every step of the criminal justice process, from privatized fine and ticket collection to bail bonds and privatized probation services. Profits come from charging high fees for services like GPS ankle monitoring, drug testing, phone and video calls, and even health care.18Many state and local governments have entered into expensive long-term contracts with private prison corporations to build and sometimes operate prison facilities. Since these contracts prevent prison capacity from being changed or reduced, they effectively block criminal justice and immigration policy changes.19
- My argument about racial bias in sentencing
- My argument about executions of innocent people
- My argument about increased costs
- My argument pointing out the deterrence argument from him is a non-sequitur
- My argument showing that LWOP gives people the chance to change
- My argument showing that prisoners overwhelmingly prefer LWOP over the death penalty
- Race (see contention 1B)
- Better representation
- More lenient judge
- Being convicted in counties with looser laws
- Etc.
- Pointed out that my opponent is ignoring many of my contentions.
- Decisively refuted my opponent’s contentions
- Set up a framework for the upcoming rounds.
That is precisely why Novice would never debate him.
I think this guy could destroy Novice...
Thanks!
My favorite debate thus far.
Great job to both participants.
Come debate me then :3
Keep your eye on this guy. Vote Pro, I concede.
It prevents recidivism…
For example:
Allowed: Showing that the death penalty does deter crime, which happens to rebut one of my arguments.
Probably not allowed (unless you can convince the voters): Refuting my arguments point-by-point in the first round.
Yes, I apologize for not clarifying the "no rebuttals in R1" rule. Rebuttals are allowed so long as they are mainly a constructive argument.
OMG I only have 2 days to reply to that. I hopefully rebut better than you later. Also Con's case naturally has to involve rebuttals by accident, I hope you will understand.