Modern TKD is a joke
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 3 votes and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Tae Kwon Do is a martial art that was created by a Korean general named Choi Hong Hi. Over time, the name and historical associations would make the sport more popular, especially in places like the US. With many dojos appearing in the country claiming to teach Tae Kwon Do, the style would repeatedly become adapted and changed over time and in other words, nerfed.
Terms and Definitions-
TKD: Tae Kwon Do is a Korean form of martial arts involving punching and kicking techniques, with emphasis on head-height kicks, spinning jump kicks, and fast kicking techniques.
Modern: Involving recent techniques, methods, or ideas.
Martial Arts: All of the various systems of training for combat that have been arranged or systematized.
Self-defense: The use of force to protect oneself from an attempted injury by another.
Combat: Hand-to-hand combat is a physical confrontation between two or more persons at short range that does not involve the use of weapons.
Competent: Having the necessary ability, knowledge, or skill to do something successfully.
Efficient: Achieving maximum productivity with minimum wasted effort or expense.
Useless: Not fulfilling or not expected to achieve the intended purpose or desired outcome.
Rules-
1. No forfeits. If you participate, you are expected to be fully committed to engaging in all of the three rounds. Forfeits are an auto-loss.
2. Burden of proof is shared. The burden of proof is a suggestion, but NOT a requirement.
Intro:I shall demonstrate how modern TKD is inadequate in several ways by proving that it fails a system of combat.
Burden of ProofTerms and definitions are all laid out in the full description.Since modern TKD involves current systems, I should win if I prove that as a whole, it is useless and in-efficient.Should Pro make the stronger case that modern TKD is useful for combat, then he wins.
Well my do jeng only had basic rules, not the super complicated ones. And it also had rules that mimicked real life and trained us to practice sparring in everyday circumstances. If your do jeng does that, then TKD is definitely not a waste of time.
I took tae kwon do classes as a kid. I luckily never had to use those skills in a real fight and most of the ability and flexibility has deteriorated by now, so I can't really evaluate how helpful they were. In general there were some basics that were good to learn, i.e., if you close your fist around your thumb you'll break it, hit soft places with hard strikes and hard places with soft strikes (smacking someone in the head to stun them rather than a bareknuckle punch, not a softer version of the same strike)
I don't regret the time I took in that class and maybe I will take a martial arts class again some day, but I have no particular preference for tae kwon do.
Yeah. Having sparring certainly makes a difference, especially in establishing the dojo as a legitimate one.
However, the amount of rules and restrictions in modern TKD sparring really limit what you’re able to do. The sparring is great for tournaments and scoring points, but useless in street or cage fighting.
It is useless if your do jeng (jang?) doesn't offer sparring practice or classes. That is where people REALLY learn to apply what they've learned. Watching two black belts spar is a beautiful art. Especially when the Tae Kwon Do instructors create scenarios that are like real life to practice with.
lucky guy xD
You are Con...
you really screwed up making yourself physically the red side here... I am not sure you realise what that means.