Nothing wrong with the wife in submission to the husband.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 4 votes and with 4 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 20,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
The head of the wife , submitting to the husband, in and of itself, nothing wrong.
I'll elaborate further in the proceeding.
Questions and comments about the topic, I'll address.
One should not be *forced* to be submissive (unless they're into that ;P)
If this is intended to be a criticism of feminism trying to overthrow the stereotype of the submissive housewife, then it is fallacious. No/few feminists are advocating that no women should be submissive ever, only that they should be able to be as submissive or dominant as they want.
Isn't it like "yes it's fine, if it's what the wife wants"?
kinky