Instigator / Pro
7
1702
rating
574
debates
67.86%
won
Topic
#3751
I pick the topic, you debate what is asked.
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 1 vote and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...
RationalMadman
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 20,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
4
1420
rating
395
debates
43.8%
won
Description
I pick the topic, I even pick the sides.
Mall/Con obeys and tries to argue the side of the topic that is assigned.
Round 1
Topic: Mall is helping RationalMadman gain rating right now.
My Side: Con
My Side: Con
Mall's Side: Pro
Anywhere, any platform where the minority views are small and alone, the majority is supported, hence being the majority.
Round 2
Mall intends to defeat me in this debate, this is why he accepted it.
If defeat, you mean by "prove wrong", that is the point.
On another note, I wouldn't mind taking on one of those rap battles depending on the agreed upon premise to the structure.
Round 3
Mall is here to take my rating if need be, he is certainly playing to win.
Good day.
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Round 4
And what is the truth
The truth is that which is.
It is what is actually so.
Round 5
Thank you for this challenge.
I appreciate your communication which is more than I can say for others on this site.
You can communicate directly to me . No one has to make prejudgements about me.
My views and others that have the same views are different, that's all.
So because of that, we're prejudged.
No , no ,no, futures readers, please take out the lessons here.
You're welcome. I figured that was what was going on.
Thanks for the vote. I intentionally distracted during this once Mall had admitted the very thing needed for me to win.
I am not sure what I just read...
This had the potential to be some liar's paradox shit.
Care to vote? If so, ty.
**************************************************
>Reported Vote: Undefeatable // Mod action: Removed
>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy
>Points Awarded: 3 points to Con (note: this and any future references to sides refers to the assigned position rather than the reversed position given by the instigator)
>Reason for Decision:
This debate was super confusing but it looks like Mall is trolling and not really trying to fight, hence “helping pro gain rating” (mall was pro for this resolution). Weird premise.
>Reason for Mod Action:
The basis for the voter's decision appears to be an interpretation of Con's argument that isn't directly justified using what was stated by the debaters. To be clear, this might be a reasonable interpretation, but the voter has to do more to show that the interpretation is valid.
**************************************************
The reason Undefeatable gives is based on his own argument for the resolution, not Mall's.
Please remove it and make him rejustify based solely on arguments.
To be fair, I think Mall is basically me, but with even less knowledge about society.
Mall is definitely a troll. You can just look to the questions ive asked him on his profile. He claims to not know what a troll is. Yet at the same time can use really good grammar on rare occasions. I'm just surprised how he can keep this troll up for years.
What the heck did I just read… oh well…