Instigator / Con
4
1466
rating
6
debates
8.33%
won
Topic
#3747
consumerism : causing destruction
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 1 vote and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...
RationalMadman
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Pro
7
1702
rating
574
debates
67.86%
won
Description
No information
Round 1
why consuming is not causing destruction ?
is love about emitting carbon ?
800 crore ?
meat consumption ?
It is and I support it.
Round 2
don`t seems clash in cause then .
about solution :
-mature humans needed - not rabbit kids
-if you are brave then and then only one child .
-max to max one child
- if second caused then huge economic penalty
-third jail
-there should be "parent license"
-very very huge taxes on meat or just don`t
-mature humans needed - not rabbit kids
Not necessarily needed, consumerism can occur with... wait what?
-if you are brave then and then only one child .
That makes little sense, you are saying 'if you are brave then and only then take the cautious route' essentially. Please revise this.
-max to max one child
Well... Er... 2 parents... 1 child... hmm... Are we trying to go extinct? Is that the mission? I see.
- if second caused then huge economic penalty
Oh! China style, eh? Do you know about the issue there when too many males were favoured?
-third jail
Good idea, parents in prison will raise the three children very well.
-there should be "parent license"
And if you get it, you can only have 1 child, excellent!
-very very huge taxes on meat or just don`t
But why tax it? My only child needs it!
Round 3
otherwise nothing is gonna change like jokes
NOTHING HAS TO CHANGE FOR PRO TO WIN
Round 4
Forfeited
I will fucking consume you.
https://youtu.be/GumRdEi1dA8