Instigator / Pro
1
1500
rating
2
debates
50.0%
won
Topic
#3746
Marxism is pro Democracy and equality
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 1 vote and with the same amount of points on both sides...
It's a tie!
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 2
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 5,500
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
1
1466
rating
6
debates
8.33%
won
Description
This is a debate about the Marxist way of viewing government structure ie dictatorship, theocracy, Republic, direct democracy, etc.
The structure will be Argument pro Argument con then counter pro and counter con
I support the argument that Marxism has never been fully realized so I'd appreciate it if you didn't state Venezuela or the USSR like they are an example of Marxism at play those perspectives are easily refutable and waste everyone's time
This whole debate is set up to PRO's disadvantage.
Also, without clearly defining any terms this debate will go nowhere fast.
in your eye USA under fear ?
ask john nationlist is they wanna really serve ?
The USA is ruled by fear, yes.
ruling nation on fear is not way of making progress , it breaks on weak seconds ; in all way from the jungle to today democracy is shining way to run mass
this ideology is rich poor cyclic structure
"Popular masses are the masters of everything in our society. Everything serves them and they have all the power. Our Socialism centred on masses shall not perish."
"Today the imperialists and reactionaries are working viciously to wipe out our socialism, but our socialism continues to advance boldly along the path it has taken, without being swayed in the least by the enemy's dastardly attacks and slander. ... The secret of its durability and indestructibility is that it is centred upon the masses, that it has made the masses the genuine masters of society and that it has devoted everything to the service of the masses."
- Kim Jong Il
con wins this easily if he knows his way around semantics.
It's a long the lines of a Marxist society would be democratic and equality would be prevalent ideally
the only reason I put pro there is to say that Marxism
supports democracy and equality sorry if I caused confusion
Todays democracy vs marcsm ?
in what context we are saying it's pro democracy and eqaul ?
Thx for the support like minded individual
And by define my terms do you mean explain my point/ Point at what I mean by democracy and equality or something else
Right on, man. I make this argument on this site all the time and people act like I'm crazy to say it. I strongly recommend you define your terms before the other guy defines them against you.