Is Belief in the Resurrection Reasonable?

Forfeiture

Con's arguments were far from persuasive, or even logical.
"When you're a Christian. It's reasonable or correct or valid to hold that belief."
This merely passes the buck to whether it is reasonable to be a Christian.

"If you believe in or administer baptisms, it is logical."
This makes even less sense, as baptisms were administered before the Resurrection of Christ.

"If you believe in the death of Christ, it logically follows to believe in the Resurrection also."
This makes the least logical sense so far. Death is a certainty (along with taxes, as the idiom goes), but Resurrection flies in the face of thousands of years of people not getting resurrected, as well as our best understanding of biology. As someone who lived 2000 years ago, it is logical to believe that Jesus died, but it would require Extraordinary Evidence to justify a belief in his resurrection.

"There can be no resurrection without death."
True, but there CAN be death without resurrection. This is, in fact the far more common condition.

"When you understand the doctrine of salvation wanting it, it'd be reasonable to believe in the resurrection."
This requires that one already believes A. that there is a need for salvation and B. that salvation has been provided.

Full forfeiture

Full forfeit

Con FF