Animal(non persons) testing should be banned.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 3 votes and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 24,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Inspired topic and thought to bring it here with somebody to step to the challenge.
The challenge to show why this type of testing should be banned.
What is the sound basis to ban this?
Is it in the best interest of humankind or not?
We'll discuss somewhere along those lines.
For questions, gripes and comments, please leave a comment or send a message, thanks.
I actually agree with con, I pressed that button by accident.
I clicked it by accident, I won't actually debate.
No takers I guess. Yes no controversy on this topic.
Pavlov’s classical conditioning is a test on dogs.