You shall continue not in sin. Teaching that growing in grace is permissible is false teaching.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 3 votes and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
I'll expound on this topic here.
Many hold the view and teach that once a person is saved, baptized in the name of Christ, baptized into that body , they can or will grow in grace .
Meaning still go on sinning, committing the same transgressions perhaps in less frequent occurrences.
That there will be some differences in reactions to breaking the laws. That there'll be mixed to changed feelings about violating the commandments.
Those that call themselves Christians that have designed all these denominations don't believe they can be holy hence all the denominations and organizations.
I won't say "without sin" for interpretation conflict but no longer sinning, being perfect is not a possibility in this lifetime to and for those that subscribe.
I think this is a fairly interesting topic and it's a shame to see it end like this. I'd like to take up the con position if you'd care to try again.
I think you will find that I SHALL continue in sin.
This topic is quite literally tautological or unfalsifiable because then Pro can just call everything Con think is wrong "sin" and just go with it and the only way to defeat Pro is being self-refutingly non-sequitur to make Pro incoherent in the first place.
I don't believe I can . But for you not to walk away empty handed, Romans 1:25-32 tells you the worth of death and the wages or payment for sin is death.
So in a roundabout way, that first chapter is telling you what some sins are. The opposite of those would be righteousness or non-sins.
Can you give me lists of 20 things that are sin and 20 things that aren't.