Instigator / Pro
1
1389
rating
413
debates
44.55%
won
Topic
#3661

It is more biologically and logically sound of man to have greater sexual attraction over a busty woman.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
1
0

After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...

Mall
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
22,288
Voting period
One month
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
0
1702
rating
574
debates
67.86%
won
Description

Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.

Pretty extensive title but I couldn't come to an agreement for alternatives.

Perhaps, "it is more logical that men find voluptuous women more attractive ." But less physiologically sound as vice versa. Oh well, somewhat terse but not so much.

The flip side of course is it making less sense for men to be attracted to very, very slender woman physically.

I brought this up in a previous debate if not mistaken, about the science of sex appeal. A documentary I think most were apprehensive about to avoid the reality or truth that would conflict their views.

But so be it, the truth can hurt like being told you have cancer or finding out that a tooth has to come out, ouch.

Any questions, comments, protests, please save them until the challenge is accepted. After that, it's like a new law that has passed. No point in petitioning any further.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

It is more biologically and logically sound of man to have greater sexual attraction over a busty woman

PRO argues that big tits are adaptive because they demonstrate available food for offspring, therefore men have evolved to find big tits attractive
CON seems to assume that big tits means overweight and compares women to hippos, cows, and whales in a profoundly misogynistic fashion
CON made no argument in R1

PRO repeats his R1 in R2
CON falsely accuses PRO of not providing a biologically sound argument,
CON made no argument in R2

PRO repeats his R1 in R3 plus some non-sequitur
CON responds with a classic STRAW MAN asking characterizing PRO's argument as about overweight and extremely busty women over a healthier and only medium bust woman. PRO never made any argument for overweight or for extremes.

In R4, PRO defends his argument against CON's straw man
CON forfeits

In R5, PRO extends again while CON gish-gallops his strawman but wrecks his own case with his data showing that 89% of men and 91% of women prefer a C or D cup when only 29% of women have a C cup or larger. If we can call the top 30% of breast sizes "busty" then CON's data shows overwhelming preference for bustiness.

Even so, the fact that CON made no substantive argument in four rounds and really only contributed misogyny and ridiculous strawmanning to the first four rounds and then thinks he's going to make up for it with a bunch of facts and literally figures without giving PRO any chance at response in the final round is pretty shit conduct on top of failing to contradict PRO's very simple sensible argument.

ARGUMENT goes to PRO. Nothing CON argued came close to refuting PRO simple, nearly tautological argument regarding bustiness as adaptive. CONDUCT also to PRO since CON's who approach was slapdash, disrespectful, and ultimately anti-persuasive