Your proposal to have all people to accept homosexuality/same sex marriage.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After not so many votes...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Your proposal to have all people to accept homosexuality/same sex marriage is what?
Basically you would come up with an argument that demonstrates that homosexual desire and behavior is correct just as heterosexuality desire and behavior.
No doubt all people accept or would have to accept heterosexuality or they deny their own existence for via heterosexuality they came. The denial would be impossible because they remain to exist known or unbeknownst to them. At least bodily speaking.
The great thing about truth , it stands separate, on its own.
So what could you say that would make homosexuality undeniable period?
For the whole world of people to accept homosexuality, what could you say in one sentence that gives us all no choice to accept it?
Something so undoubtedly so that everything else we believe and accept about sex or sexuality would confuse or contradict our position if we're not accepting to homosexuality.
If one sentence is too challenging, try within five sentences.
Are you game?
For ALL questions on words used here therein , clarity, etc., you can comment , have a civil discussion, let's do it.
This debate should not have been a tie due to the FF. However, it seems no voter spotted it within the voting window.
Yikes, a FF. This shouldn't be a tie.
This debate isn't
Same sex marriage /homosexuality are on the table. Now if you don't care about what I mean , don't communicate with a person in that manner. That's what communication is. You have to be attentive to what I'm communicating.
Except I could easily just define accepting as what it usually means and not care what you think it means. You wouldn't be arguing for the resolution, if you want your argument to work here is the resolution, "Your proposal to have all people do homosexuality/same sex marriage." By the way, homosexuality and same sex marriage aren't the same thing.
Also, it doesn't make sense about no one in existence. This is about acceptance. That's a positive , conscious position to take. You have to exist with a conscious mind in order to do so.
*****See you have to really think here.******
The supreme court would laugh you out of their court.
The court didn't declare mass destruction to establish "equality" that would make a more accepting society.
They clearly just amended laws. You guys are going to have to start being honest as we can see this is going on today. So how is it a solution to reverse the wheels of progress? You want to keep pushing towards that end goal making more changes, ***improving***
the present situation.
You guys just can't admit this defeatist , genocide , terrorist move is the opposite of a positive thing . Throwing out a bill doesn't mean it was paid.
Exterminating humanity does the deed, as if you haven't heard of it already.
You just got to think. It may not come to you right away.
What could it be? What could you say that would even make a so called homophobe accept homosexuality?
Also, it doesn't make sense about no one in existence. This is about acceptance. That's a positive , conscious position to take. You have to exist with a conscious mind in order to do so.
See you have to really think here.
This is the hardest so far. We pretty much can’t justify same-sex marriages at all cases.
This debate is pretty much impossible under normal circumstances. I recommend you change the description so that people can't use the same solution to racism you asked for and say if nobody exists on planet earth than "all people have accepted homosexual marriage".