It is preferable for beautiful women to actively go after a career than go after a man

The crux of Pro’s argument is the idea that beautiful women should maximize the amount of money they have via careers. In effect, Pro wants women to replace romance, love, and family with money. This argument fails for two reasons: (1) because more money doesn't satisfy our deepest human needs, and (2) because even if you choose money as your ultimate good, beautiful women can maximize money faster by seducing a rich man.

(1) Our deepest intuitions tells us that life is about more than money, it’s about love, family, friendship, spirituality, community, and much more. That’s why we drop everything to be at the bedside of a dying loved one. More money can't satisfy our deepest needs, especially our need for connection. And the research bears that out, showing across multiple studies that people who choose money are less happy than people who choose more romantic values. See, for example, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1948550616649239.

My argument is simple, then: focusing life around romance, love, and family leads to a better life than focusing life around a company job, because while the former leads to spiritual, aesthetic, and emotional fulfillment, the latter leads to nothing but shallow relationships and financial insecurity. A romantic worldview provides deep connection to another, a sense of security because you trust those around you, and a feeling of purpose. Meanwhile, obsessing over money ultimately leaves disconnected from potential lovers, as well as financially insecure, because the desire for more money leads to the feeling that you never have enough (i.e. desiring more money leads to perpetual poverty).

Thus, rather than view the world in terms of the market economy, beautiful women should approach the world with deeper values like romance, love, and family. This isn't radical, it's common sense. After all, women derive most of their happiness from non-monetary sources. Women prefer the excitement of a romance to the tediousness of answering endless streams of pointless company emails. They prefer leisure. And in particular, women prefer giving. Women like taking care of others without being paid to do it. They like volunteering in their communities, again without payment.

Con presumes that merely because I list money that it is the prime factor for career, but that is not the case. Women only have to achieve financial stability in order to satisfy living, and the rest is up to them. They may choose among countless jobs that fulfill what they love and give them the sense of freedom. Recall that I said previously, women in the work force are an inspiration to young girls to choose their own path.

As a blog notes, along with four reasons resonating with the need for financial base, one testimony said: “Being in love comes with expectations, commitment and demands that force you to give up a lot of your personal space. I am not willing to do that at any cost. My job lets me travel the world, explore different cultures and meet new people every single day. I love this freedom and have fallen in love with this life. My work is my passion and I am yet to find someone worthy enough to change my priorities.”

There is a Japanese concept of "Ikigai", the purpose of life, which may be achieved by career. The secret to making your life more fulfilling and happy. Pick a job that you love, contributes to society, pays you, and that you're good at. Our curiosity and sense of self drives everyone to a well-chosen career. But chasing after men can often be fruitless and unfortunate in comparison.

Indeed, Con only shows the best side of love, but has not considered the process. It takes 140+ days to say "I love you", from round 1. And even then, the relation is not guaranteed to last. There are even many reasons listed common to why breakups are incredibly common even after 1~2 years, according to experts. The marriage rate in US has dropped to a low 6.5 per 1,000 population, and divorce rate is 2.9 per 1,000 -- that's almost half as much! -- inferring that love is just not what it used to be. Heartbreak and tragic suffering with wasted time clearly results in an ending no one wants to achieve. 

Consider this situation where the woman was stuck at crossroads and had to choose. She loves a man and he loves her back. But she has her personal passion that she wants to pursue. Most would agree, that the man's show of true love would letting her have the freedom to choose her passion, have her independence. Because our personal autonomy is one thing we value just as much as love. For the man to ask her to choose him infers a selfish decision. Keep in mind, that if the woman chooses the man as her main goal, that means most her effort would be concentrated on him, rather than herself. Though the man can support her emotionally and financially, the woman might always be wondering, what if she just tried to seek out the activity she loved. Just like hobbies, jobs are an essential part of life. We can't give up those, just for the sake of another person. Let's seek for what WE personally value most consistently, rather than having trouble finding individuals who can be with you for your life.

Money just happens to be a bonus on the way, and does not have to be the main greedy purpose that undermines my own case. Con has not negated the fact that if relationship fail for any of the 16 reasons, the heartbreak and the energy spent is not worth it. In contrast to relations' very low stability rate, 85% of people have reported that they are happy in their workplace, putting massive doubt in con's attempt to refute ikigai. On the other hand, only 64% of people are happy in their relations. The attachment to people can let it become a parasite and toxic in your life, especially if it is not going well, but you feel attached to the person. Jobs however, have countless companies in the same sector, and the deep emotional attachment is lesser.

Jobs still allow you to communicate with others, make friends, chase your passion. All three combined with saving money establish a good base, and the statistics already show that people like jobs more often than people like their partners. The problem with relation is that it takes a lot of energy and con's attempts to say that the woman can try to seduce someone rich, brings down his case, as this would similar to my round 1 of only looking at the financial matters. If the woman is able to establish her independence and her love for herself, then I believe, it sets up the relationship much better. There are just too many variables in relation, further assisting and echoing the above round: sex, money, communication, arguments... But in the workplace, just perform well, connect with coworkers, and you're good to go. The friendships are arguably just as important as the partnership, and the money along with love of job will allow my argument to boost the career ahead of the partner. Vote for pro.

There’s not much left to say. Pro’s argument has already crumbled, as he’s repeatedly dropped arguments throughout the debate. 
 
Pro refers to some surveys in the final round, but the surveys yet again help my case more than his. First, Pro says 85% of people are happy in their workplace, but hides the fact that the survey isn’t talking about life as a whole. There’s a difference. Pro's survey was measuring “how Americans feel about their jobs,” not how they feel about their life as a whole. It’s also a survey of a certain class of professionals, specifically people who have higher degrees of education working in elite jobs. Thus, if you find this survey relevant even though it’s not, apply all my arguments about the risks of student loan debt, fierce competition (not just with beautiful women but among all people), shallow relationships, delayed marriage, and ultimately divorce. 
 
Second, Pro cites a survey that says only 64% of people are happy in their relationships. But again, Pro hides the key finding from this survey: the factors that made people happy in their relationships, and the factors that made people unhappy in their relationships. According to Pro’s survey, respondents who were “perfectly happy” were those that prioritized romance and took “the time to get to know one another before taking the plunge into marriage,” whereas the unhappy couples were those that “prioritized companionship over love,” which is to say, the couples who didn't prioritize their relationship. It’s the people who prioritized career over romance who wanted a relationship for companionship, and Pro's survey tells us that these same people are the ones who end up in unhappy relationships. These findings aren’t surprising. 
 
Pro also says some stuff about the harms of “deep emotional attachment.” Again, Pro hasn’t contested my point that humans have a deep need for connection, nor has he contested my sources showing that people are happier when they choose to prioritize romantic values over market values. Pro’s own sources support my point. Having a deep connection with another person leads to a better life. Prioritizing love over career leads to a better life. All the evidence shows that. Pro’s anti-connection ethos is deeply nihilistic and defeatist. It also runs contrary to the Western canon of literature, poetry, and art, as well as every major Eastern text on these issues as well.  
 
Pro also suggests that careers take less effort. But again, that’s nihilistic and defeatist. After all, just because something is easier doesn’t mean it’s better or preferable. Becoming a burger flipper at McDonalds is easier than becoming a world-class surgeon, but most people would say becoming a surgeon is preferable. Again, this is common sense. Some things are worth fighting for because they make life better. Romance, love, and family are some of those things. They might take more energy than a simple career like burger flipper, but they also provide far more aesthetic, emotional, and spiritual nourishment, while also improving society in immeasurable ways.
 
Finally, Pro says that jobs “still allow you to communicate with others.” So too romance also allows you to have a career. The issue is whether to prioritize one over the other. Pro’s sources show that people who prioritize love have happy relationships, whereas those that prioritize careers have unhappy relationships. Pro hasn’t provided any evidence that people who prioritize careers have better lives. To the contrary, the evidence shows the opposite. 
 
For all the reasons presented in this debate, a beautiful woman should actively pursue a man over a career.