Instigator / Pro
Crocodile's avatar
11
Crocodile
1436
rating
22
debates
38.64%
won
Topic
#2444

Unrap battle

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
3
6
Better sources
4
6
Better legibility
2
3
Better conduct
2
3

After 3 votes and with 7 points ahead, the winner is...

seldiora
Tags
Music
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
2
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
seldiora's avatar
18
seldiora
1417
rating
158
debates
32.59%
won
Description

m a k e
worst rap

whoever makes the worst rap wins

Round 1
Crocodile's avatar
Crocodile
Pro
#1
yo this is such ass trash, you call this an "attack"?
splicin' word turds that I shoot back, rat-a-ta-tat
thinkin this a coffin dance, it is I who got you in a trance,
you got no romance, no chance, such poor stance

Yeah, you thinking of me poor but
I got you shrinking and fleeing, such a bore
Oh, what's stinking, your asshole sore?
I'm the supreme being, with infinite grandeur

Scorchin' you through and down with burns,
Torchin' you clown, make your stomach churn
Each word making you doubt, have concern
Reach got you shaking, pass out, low born
Boy's insecure, already screwed, past no return
My poison's brewed, this session is adjourned



As you can see, my rap is obviously the worst, because it's made by seldiora


seldiora's avatar
seldiora
Con
#2
Procreation is the act of reproduction, or the production of offspring
Sexual intercourse is the act which results in production of offspring.
Important means of great value or significance.
Premise 1: Organisms must reproduce to survive.
Premise 2: Surviving is the most important thing to do if you want to stay alive. (Which is obvious.)
Premise 3: Reproduction occurs during or after sexual intercourse.
Conclusion: Reproduction is the most important use of sexual intercourse.

As you can see, this rap is far worse as it is Crocodile's argument from his very first debate on this website. It has no insults at all, no rhythm, and rhymes "offspring" with itself, and even "survive" with "surviving", along with "reproduction" rhyming with "reproduction". He even tries to claim that his lust for sex is merely due to the bigger purpose of reproduction. Tsk tsk tsk. I've already won this unrap battle, and we've barely begun.



Round 2
Crocodile's avatar
Crocodile
Pro
#3
DR. FRANKLIN, LET US BEGIN YOUR DEVIL SPEAK  BLOODBATH:


"EVERY WORD OF GOD PROVES TRUE; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him. Do not add to his words, lest he rebuke you and you be found a liar." (Proverbs 30:5-6) Therefore, the following biblical axioms are true!

Barring the fact that other godly religious groups in the Bronze and Iron Age of our Christian beginnings thought the earth was flat as well as Jesus did, (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_Earth), we will start with the easy Christian biblical axioms first and foremost. 

Therefore, the following first passage of many, states with specificity that Jesus will sit upon the CIRCLE of the earth, whereas a CIRCLE is FLAT, and not a globe or a sphere in any sense of the term whatsoever, period! 2+2=4.

“It is he who sits above the circle of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers; who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to dwell in;” (Isaiah 40:22)

As explicitly shown, Isaiah is actually describing the Earth as flat and circular, with a dome-shaped sky covering the flat earth.  NOTE: if Isaiah wanted to call it a sphere or a globe, he could have easily done so because earlier he states that God will “roll you up tightly like a ball" and throw you into another country. (Isaiah 22:18). GET IT?



Now we will go to the four corners of the earth bible references below, where Jesus’ inspired word states with specificity that the earth has four corners, whereas you cannot have four corners on a globe, but only upon a flat earth, period! Therefore Jesus posits that the earth is flat!  Any pseudo-christian want to call Jesus a LIAR on this biblical axiom, other than Dr. Franklin? Huh? 

“After this I saw four angels standing at the four corners of the earth, holding back the four winds of the earth, that no wind might blow on earth or sea or against any tree.” (Revelation 7:1)

“He will raise a signal for the nations and will assemble the banished of Israel, and gather the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth.” (Isaiah 11:12)

“And you, O son of man, thus says the Lord God to the land of Israel: An end! The end has come upon the four corners of the land.” ( Ezekiel 7:2)

“And when the thousand years are ended, Satan will be released from his prison and will come out to deceive the nations that are at the four corners of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them for battle; their number is like the sand of the sea.” (Revelation 20:7-8)



The Biblical authors’ worldview, as other godly religions did in this era as shown with the Wiki link above, described a flat Earth with a vault of heaven over it, and where the Sun rose and set by its own movements, not the Earth’s orbit around it.

Thick clouds veil him, so he does not see us as he walks about on the vault of heaven.” (Job 22:14)

“The tree grew large and strong and its top touched the sky; it was visible to the ends of the earth.” (Daniel 4:11) Daniel’s dream implies that the tree was touching the ceiling of the vaulted sky, and could be seen everywhere, implying the earth being flat to be visible to the ends of the earth!  COMPRENDE?

“…the earth is turned upside down to scatter its inhabitants.” (Isaiah 24:1 KJV). Only a flat earth can be turned upside down to scatter all of Jesus’ Creation! 2+2=4, oil and water don’t mix, and Dr. Franklin is HELL BOUND upon his demise for blaspheming our Lord Jesus!

"Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory." (Matthew 4:8) The devil can only show Jesus all of the kingdoms of the world if the earth is flat like so many passages before this one so state!


Another Flat Earth Proposition:  After our Jesus brutally slaughters the unbelievers in his return (Rev.9:7-10,15-19), He will then remake the heavens and the earth where the Bible speaks of a city called the "New Jerusalem" coming down out of heaven. Jesus will bring down this new city to the earth’s flat surface where TRUE Christians like myself, and not pseudo-christians like Dr. Franklin, will inhabit this new city with our Savior forever, praise!

TAKE NOTE: According to the biblical description, this city is approximately 1,500 miles by 1,500 miles by 1,500 miles. The city lies foursquare, its length is the same as its width; and He measured the city with his rod, fifteen hundred miles; its length and width and height are equal. Therefore, this city is a cube and flat on all sides! (Revelation 21:16).  A cube that’s 1,500 miles across land can only be placed upon a flat earth, therefore, for a cube with this extensive length, John implies that the Earth has to be flat so when the new city is placed upon a 1500 mile stretch! GET IT? MAYBE?


Not known to the bible ignorant Dr. Franklin at this time, but Jesus has given me a “plethora” of forthcoming passages and narratives that also show that His Earth was FLAT! Those will be forthcoming at the expense of Dr. Franklin once again.

DR. FRANKLIN, THE BALL IS IN YOUR COURT, BUT HANG ON BECAUSE JESUS AND I ARE JUST WARMING UP!



Whoops I'm sorry, I accidentally put the best rap :(
seldiora's avatar
seldiora
Con
#4
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.

Quite straightforward, Take one with the other. It's a package deal. You can demonstrate the differences and we can put them to the test.
We can find out whether these differences have to stand in the way of happiness. Why not support these two types of marriages? What exception could there be?

For clarity or questions, Please send a message or comment prior to accepting debate.

Vote for con.