Is healthcare a right?
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 23 votes and with 91 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- Six months
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
I see healthcare as a right to live issue. People have the right to live. Many who claim to support property rights deny my right to protect my property: My human body.
Full forfeit
Full forfeit.
Full Forfeit
Full forfeit
Forfeiture
prescription medication is poison
Full forfeit from pro.
Yeah, if you could just present an argument next time, that'd be great.
forfeiture.
ummmm this was kinda lame, pro forfeited everything
Lol con forfeited the entire debate
Full forfeit.
full forfeit
Full forfeit
Full forfeit
Con forced Pro to never meet BoP by making a single point to Pro's 0.
FF.
Full Forfeit
No arguments from pro or con so no argument points awarded. The forfeit merits a win by con in the conduct category and none other
Full Forfeit
mayonnaise colored benz I push miracle whips - Kanye west
Full forfeit
Full forfeit on Pro's part. Con also had more convincing arguments since he actually had arguments.
Con made an appearance for the first three rounds and at least stated his case, although without any significant arguments to support it..
Pro forfeit all rounds and provided nothing.
Conduct to Con. Tie on all else.
Victory Royale
Good win
Nice job Greyperrot.
I think healthcare should be funded by religious institutions as much as feasibly possible for those that can't afford it with the help of RIEP (Religious Institution Enhancement Policy). This way, more people donate to institutions, and society becomes better while people get their health insurance through consensual funds instead of taxes which are taken by force.
Why did you award con source points?