Instigator / Pro
10
1498
rating
1
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#2143
Online Debate
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 14 votes and with 88 points ahead, the winner is...
oromagi
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 500
- Voting period
- Two months
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
98
1922
rating
117
debates
97.44%
won
Description
Panuto: Magkakaroon ng debate ang mga mag-aaral. Sa isang panig ang mga nagsasabi na pantay-pantay ang lahat ng tao, sa kabila naman ang mga naniniwala na hindi pantay-pantay ang mga tao.
Round 1
Forfeited
thx, El-Khe
ONLINE DEBATE
DEFINITIONS:
ONLINE is "available over the Internet."
DEBATE is "an argument, usually in an ordered or formal setting"
BURDEN of PROOF:
"When
two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the other
disputes, the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to
justify or substantiate that claim especially when it challenges a
perceived status quo"
CON
interprets the resolution to mean that PRO must prove his intention to debate online.
Round 2
Forfeited
Salamat, EL-Khe!
ONLINE DEBATE
CON1:
- Ang PAGHAYAG ng KALAYAAN
- Inaangkin namin ang mga katotohanang ito na maging maliwanag sa sarili, na ang lahat ng mga tao ay nilikha na pantay, na pinagkalooban ng kanilang Maylalang na may tiyak na hindi magagawang Mga Karapatan, na kabilang sa mga ito ay ang Buhay, Kalayaan at ang hangarin ng Kaligayahan.
CON2:
- Frances Wright:
- Ang pagkakapantay-pantay ay ang kaluluwa ng kalayaan; sa katunayan, walang kalayaan kung wala ito.
CON looks forward to PRO's R3 response.
Round 3
Forfeited
- Artikulo 1:
- "Lahat ng tao ay ipinanganak nang libre at pantay sa dignidad at karapatan. Pinagkalooban sila ng pangangatuwiran at budhi at dapat kumilos sa isa't isa sa diwa ng kapatiran."
CON4:
- M. K. Gandhi:
- "Walang dalawang dahon ang magkapareho, at gayon pa man ay walang antagonismo sa pagitan nila o sa pagitan ng mga sanga kung saan sila lumalaki."
CON looks forward to PRO's R4 response.
Round 4
Forfeited
Salamat, EL-Khe!
ONLINE DEBATE
CON1:
- dropped
CON2:
- dropped
CON3:
- dropped
CON4:
- dropped
CON5:
- "La Dictionnaire Philosophique", Voltaire
- Kung ang mundong ito ay kung ano ang nararapat, kung ang tao ay makakahanap ng lahat ng dako nito, isang madaling pag-iisa, at isang klima na angkop sa kanyang kalikasan, malinaw na imposible para sa isang tao na maalipin ang isa pa.
CON looks forward to PRO's R5 response.
Round 5
Forfeited
ONLINE DEBATE
VOTERS should recall that CON
interprets the resolution to mean that PRO must prove his intention to debate online.
CON1:
- dropped
CON2:
- dropped
CON3:
- dropped
CON4:
- dropped
CON5:
- dropped
CONCLUSION
- CON submits PRO's full forfeiture as evidence PRO has no intention to debate online.
- PRO dropped every point CON made and PRO made zero arguments in PRO 's defense.
- VOTERS should award CON the awful falafel of full forfeiture .
- Thx, El-Khe and
- Thanks to all VOTERS for their kind consideration.
- Pls. vote CON!
Ppl still voting on this? Why?
Just realized I made all points tied. Had to delete and redo.
thank u, intelligence
R4 SOURCES:
https://history.hanover.edu/texts/voltaire/volequal.html
https://www.google.com/search?q=english+to+tagalog&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
R3 SOURCES:
https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
https://quotefancy.com/quote/857197/Mahatma-Gandhi-No-two-leaves-were-alike-and-yet-there-is-no-antagonism-between-them-or
https://www.google.com/search?q=english+to+tagalog&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
There are lots of one-time debaters where they quickly create one then go away. They constitute 50% of my total win in my old account.
R2 SOURCES:
https://www.google.com/search?q=english+to+tagalog&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Wright
Well Oro is known to play semantics, so he probably thinks that a post not in english is one equal of nothing.
Yeah I thought so too.
I thought you are supposed to prove that people aren't equal
R1 SOURCES:
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/online
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/debate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_%28philosophy%29
Hi, El-Khe. I see this is your first debate but I think you will probably want a chance to refine your formatting. I've translated your description from Tagalog:
Rule: Students will have a debate. On the one hand those who say that everyone is equal, while others believe that people are not equal.
Which certainly sounds like an interesting and debatable topic. I would recommend that you write the debate topic in English and set some expectations for what kind of debate you are looking for in the description. I recommend that we delete this debate so you can restart without penalty