1417
rating
158
debates
32.59%
won
Topic
#2027
2015+ Underrated Song Battle
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 6 votes and with 6 points ahead, the winner is...
seldiora
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 4,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
1468
rating
2
debates
0.0%
won
Description
Both pro and con choose one song, it must be less than 5 million views on youtube and released in 2015 or after. We will argue about the messages, lyrics, melody, so on and so forth, to try convincing the voters that their chosen song is the superior one.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
"My disappointment is immeasurable, and my day is ruined."
F(F)
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
A full forfeit.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
Forfeiture.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
Full forfeiture from the Contender. "It's raining after all" I can see the Instigator's disappointment.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
Pro is the only one that has any presented argument at all.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
FF .
I meant that we will argue that the song displays the message, that the message makes the song a good one (for instance, a song about drugs, alcohol and sex may not be as appealing as one that gives power to women)
Interesting...... But I do not see the meaning of "argue about the messages". What does that imply? And what is the specific definition?