Instigator / Pro

RationalMadman

1702

rating

574

debates

67.86%

won

Topic

#195

[NO KRITIK ON GOD'S EXISTENCE] The real God is more likely feminine vs masculine. (Pro vs Con)

Status

Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics

Better arguments

Better sources

Better legibility

Better conduct

After 7 votes and with 35 points ahead, the winner is...

RationalMadman

Tags

Philosophy

Parameters

Publication date: 10.20.2018 01:58AM
Last updated date: 01.08.2019 11:28PM
Type: Standard
Number of rounds: 5
Time for argument: Three days
Max argument characters: 30,000
Voting period: Two months
Point system: Multiple criterions
Voting system: Open

Contender / Con

Type1

1266

rating

119

debates

15.97%

won

Description

You cannot Kritik God's existence, you must argue against this notion.

Round 1

RationalMadman

10.22.2018 10:11PM

Pro

I'll wait and see what my opponent brings in light of God's masculinity and am not going to give my opponent too much to attack in R2 when this is a 5-round freestyle debate.

Let's just lay out the basics:

Females create life and things the are conscious but not them, males... Interact with, protect, control and/or use said being but don't create them. God is so severely feminine that her ONLY function is the creation, her interaction is very minimalist and much more 'let's see how my beautiful children evolve' overall.
A feminine God would probably lie about herself a lot, allowing only the most courageous and wise of men (or women, she's probably bisexual since she made both) to solve the mystery and seduce her. A masculine God, if it really is as depicted in the Abrahamic religions or any religion so far with a male 'he' God, is going to aggressively ensure we know just who we're dealing with and would rule us with a blatant iron fist. The elegance of the mystery shrouding God's true identity and nature itself is effeminate much more so than it is masculine.
Men have nipples and in almost all gendered species, males function as if they came AFTER (came after ;) ;) ) the women. The penis is fitted to the vagina, the vagina is 0% fitted to the penis. The vagina is fitted to take in 'something' but mostly is designed around how to get the creature produce in the uterus OUT but not being so loose it falls out beforehand even if the pregnant women is totally relaxed. This is indicative of the male being designed around the female. The tale if Adam and Eve must indeed be interpreted totally wrong or be a lie if we are to seriously think Adam was created first and Eve FOR HIM.
The male demigods of Hinduism have a creator... The creator interacts with a supreme force known as Brahman but let's think for a minute... The Creator Brahma (not Brahman) is 'interacting' and 'producing' via direct interactions with the raw essence of reality, Brahman itself. It's almost like the male Brahma is REPRODUCING what Brahman has already envisioned and thus 'produced' mentally speaking.

That's all for now.

Type1

10.25.2018 10:11PM

Con

Forfeited

Round 2

RationalMadman

10.28.2018 10:11PM

Pro

Forfeited

Type1

10.31.2018 10:11PM

Con

Forfeited

Round 3

RationalMadman

10.31.2018 11:02PM

Pro

God likes me more than you, she digs my masculinity.

Type1

11.03.2018 11:02PM

Con

Forfeited

Round 4

RationalMadman

11.03.2018 11:20PM

Pro

End of discussion.

Type1

11.06.2018 11:20PM

Con

Forfeited

Round 5

RationalMadman

11.06.2018 11:28PM

Pro

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0UpE212nPQ

Type1

11.09.2018 11:28PM

Con

#10

Forfeited

Vader

12.16.2018 12:11AM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Full forfeit

David

11.13.2018 05:47AM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

full forfeit

Ramshutu

11.12.2018 01:15PM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Full forefeit

Mharman

11.12.2018 01:55AM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Forfeit happens.

Ben11

11.10.2018 08:26PM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

This could have been an interesting debate if it wasn’t a full forfeit

Raltar

11.10.2018 01:46AM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Con sadly forfeited the debate. Conduct to Pro for that.

I hope I wasn't the only person who felt it was a bad idea to let an avowed Atheist defend God in a debate?

Alec

11.09.2018 11:58PM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

I disagree with Pro, but I think he deserves to win because he made more convincing arguments. Con forfeit the whole debate, which is poor arguments as well as poor conduct.