Vote CON!
Just by this statement itself, which CON states that he/she wants the win.
Now, fellow debaters aside CON him/herself, look at the title of the debate. Title of the debate is shown in the line below:
While CON advocates for voting himself, which seems right, it is not the best strategy, if I'd say. CON, is supposed to disagree about the title since the instigator, which is PRO, which is ME, is the one supposed to agree with the title. CON, on the other hand, is not supposed to agree with the statement. So, what CON is supposed to argue is that PRO will win the debate or that it will result in a tie, in which, he conceded.
Since I am proving that I will win, I did not prove what I am supposed to prove, thus I am the one to lose, and thus I DID prove what is in the title, which is that CON will win.
Also, If you are checking my account:
https://www.debateart.com/participants/User_2006 you will find that I have lost 100% of the debates that I have completed while only one in the progress of voting is winning, and 3 others I am losing. The win-lose percentage of PRO is less than CON. Since CON denied that he is experienced enough to debate about anything else, CON also conceded that since if he loses, Pro will win, which is one possibility that is desirable for him, which means he WON the debate, which is considered undesirable, which means that he did not prove what he is supposed to prove, and since I did prove what I am supposed to prove, which is that CON will lose, which is not what I am supposed to prove, and thus I will lose and CON will win, and that is desirable for the terms of this debate.
It is also negated that this debate will end in a tie, which is undesirable for PRO consider anything but CON winning is desirable for CON at the stage of debating. Thus, a tie will favor CON. Since Ragnar in the comments section is a very active voter, there is little to no chance that he wouldn't vote here. Also, the fact that there are many more active voters would just mean that it is close to 0 in chances that no one would vote here.
The motion lied
Sorry, did not see your reply before close of voting. Did not affect outcome
The only way is to delete the vote for you to recast it with any corrections.
Is that would you would like to do?
Ragnar, as noted in my post #9, I erred in actual assignment of points, contrary to my text. Can this be corrected? I don't know how.
Yes, textually, I gave yo the point, but erred in the actual assignment of the point. I don't know how to change that.
I think it is him who made the error, not me.
Reminds me of the "this sentence is a lie" paradox.
Also title is a declaration, not a subject persay. So i advise unmoderated votes to con.
There is an easy fix to this. Ie Troll debating. Problem solved
bruh this hurts my head
I'm so confused right now...
Looks like it might be a draw
Been a long time since I saw one of these. Good luck to both sides.