Medical decisions should be made by parents instead of doctors

I was about to complain about the laziness of this debate but then I noticed the 100c limit which changes the game somewhat.

We might note that PRO is more or less arguing in favor of a long-standing and uncontroversial principle

PRO's R1 was fine: familiarity offers superior information
CON's R1 reply, some parents are also drs was lame. CON also argues superior information.
PRO's R2 argues Drs may be too self-interested
CON's R2 argues parents less impartial. cites utilitarianism without explainable.
PRO's R3 repeats R1, R2
CON's R3 does same.

Args too vague and unsubstantiated to ascribe a winning arg to either side.

Pro largely relied on the fact that parents know their child better because they've raised them and such. Con flips this however by pointing to people not getting vaccinated dying, and presumably this wouldn't happen if a doctor made the choice. So despite parents knowing their child's emotions better, it's clear that doctors are better at saving lives. This point was dominated by Con at the end of the day. Pro then says that doctors may have ulterior motives with no source to back it up, Con provides me with a source that show how a parent's ignorance can kill.

Honestly it was clear that allowing doctors to make medical choices for children saved lives, while parents, however knowledgeable of a child's emotions, can be ignorant to what is medically best for their child. The ulterior motives point fell flat, this was because Con proved that parents can be just the same by linking a story of a Jehovah's witness denying their child proper medical treatment for religious reasons.