1466
rating
2
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#1616
Abiogenesis
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 4 votes and with 19 points ahead, the winner is...
GeneralGrant
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Two weeks
- Max argument characters
- 20,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
1395
rating
22
debates
20.45%
won
Description
Abiogenesis is possible and supported by evidence.
Round 1
Forfeited
forfeit
Round 2
Forfeited
Forfeited
Round 3
Forfeited
Forfeited
Round 4
Forfeited
Life cannot arise from non-life.
Round 5
Forfeited
I rest my case.
You need to submit at least one point to make your case, or this debate will be an FF on both sides. It really doesn't matter what argument you use. Just write something so we can give you argument points.
oh yeah, I had almost forgotten about good ol' backwardseden. I guess I just blocked out all of the times I got called a "pus filled dung bile cotton faced teeny bopper."
not by real science no no
Nah that was justbackwardseden
Likewise...
Also the fact that you made "supposed" enemy's on debate.org probably had something to do with your clearly inappropriate and vulgar behavior/language towards others on the site.
another one from DDO
**sigh**
--> @OoDart
Is creation from a supreme being of some sort supported by empirical evidence? No, so no it doesn't count.
--> @zedivictor4
It was more of an opening rather then an actual argument, so i wouldn't judge yet based off that alone.
Does creation from a Supreme Being of some sort count as abiogenesis?
"Abiogenesis is possible and supported by evidence."
Well. That's a self supporting truism in a nutshell if ever I saw one.
It's like saying, frying pans are possible and supported by evidence.
Not a great deal of science required.