1294
rating
75
debates
18.0%
won
Topic
#1405
if your internet goes out for 3 days/ you get a re do of all the debates you forfeited
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 4 votes and with 7 points ahead, the winner is...
billbatard
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
1616
rating
32
debates
62.5%
won
Description
you did not defeat my logic , you defeated my shit internet provider, Spectrum sucks
Round 1
I wanted to debate, but the dog ate my homework, or there about, a tree fell over during a storm and took out a hub in my sopoke and 5000 homes lost internat AND CABLE every magzine in the house is covered in peanut butter and tears, i think i'm addicted
I wanted to debate, but the dog ate my homework, or there about, a tree fell over during a storm and took out a hub in my sopoke and 5000 homes lost internat AND CABLE every magzine in the house is covered in peanut butter and tears, i think i'm addicted
Ate you're homework, you're 63 years old!-https://www.debate.org/billsands/
Also, is there any evidence of you're misfortunes, it looks like you're making it up.
Last, redoing debates is unfair without opponent's consent because he could be gone or on a break.
Round 2
cal up spectrum if you want my node was out for 3 days at least east side of cleveland massive storm outage
Forfeited
Round 3
if you want i'll take a lie detector test
Forfeited
Round 4
more bad conduct again my internat did go out my opponts only retort was i MIGHT b lying again i offer to take a lie detector test threrefore i win
Forfeited
Round 5
the dog really did eat my homeowrk
BSH MADE ME FORFEIT
what is bsh anyways?
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments ✔ ✗ ✗ 3 points
Better sources ✗ ✔ ✗ 2 points
Better spelling and grammar ✗ ✔ ✗ 1 point
Better conduct ✔ ✗ ✗ 1 point
Reason:This is PRO''s most engaged argument which is saying almost nothing. I think PRO is arguing for a DART policy change to resubmit forfeited debates but he never describes his intention. Still CON skips PRO's plan and goes straight to challenging evidence- which might have worked out if PRO hadn't given a reasonable plan for verification (would have been better if he'd linked to cable provider himself- source points!) and CON hadn't forfeited the final four rounds while finishing with an excuse for forfeit that plays as better evidence for PRO than CON. Args to PRO. Conduct to PRO for CON's forfeits.
i vacation in cleveland i ride that way dont judge me
you will take my word for it, trust me dont pry when you state into an abyss the abyss stars back
Your profile says your from france and you have hinted strongly at being not american. Now you say east side of cleveland....
I dont think it would be wise to use yourself as a premise in an online debate, you will have to disclose an uncomfortable amount of information. Without this information however, your personal circumstances are unproveable, and thus irrelevant. Chock it up to luck. If this seems unfair, atleast be thankful you arent part of the majority born to a 3rd world or autocratic nation. :D
con can verify my excuse simply by calling spectrum customer service and asking about the outages on east side of cleveland, that way my private stuff stays private, which is my right