life is created by god

Point 1

sweet flag roots helps with stuttering

point 3

though i can not prove some of the example listed in here.

life is perfectly balanced.

If there is to much deer the wolf population grows. if there to many wolfs less deer and they starve and it balances itself out.

trees breath in co2 and put out air. we breath air and put out co2

is it not a coincidence that the trees eat are waste and put out what we need to survive. and the trees eat our waste and put out what they need to survive.

point 4

Thank you for your opening argument. Because the burden of proof rests on you, this round will largely be a rebuttal.
Your mostly gave a series of unrelated points, but it seems like your overarching main argument through them was “Anytime something weird or interesting happens, it’s because of God”. This round, I will try to show you the flaws in your logic, and explain most of the examples you brought up are perfectly natural, and don’t require God’s interference in order to exist.
I say “most of” your examples because your first one is completely inaccurate. You’ve chosen as your source a website called “Green Med Info”, and upon research, I have found that the website opposes vaccination, GMOs, and modern medicine in general. I find that “alternative medicine”-type websites in general are unreliable and manipulative with their so-called “evidence”, but that’s another debate altogether. So knowing this, I’ve checked more reliable and less biased sources to see whether or not turmeric root has miraculous brain-healing properties as you claim.
The consensus from medical professionals, people who dedicate their lives to studying the inner workings of the human body, generally came to the consensus that turmeric root is questionable as medicine. [1] At best, it has been found to remedy minor inflammations. Certainly not fixing up brains. And if you read the article which you linked, you will find that their claim that turmeric patches up brain pathways is based on speculation from a database of their own creation, not from any sort of experimentation or actual instances of this happening. Before I move on, I would just like to point out the disclaimer at the bottom of the article you linked: “This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.” Possibly the truest statement on that website.
Before I move on, I would like to address directly the argument you seem to be making. So, in spite of the lack of any evidence, let’s say that turmeric really did have the power of 1000 neurosurgeons. How does that in any way lend itself to proving God exists? Because it’d mean God provided an easy natural remedy to illnesses? Turmeric is only found in India, so only Indians would have had access to this supposed panacea until our age of globalization. Doesn’t God like to punish people who believe in different gods, as the Bible would have us believe? Then why give the cure to the followers of Ganesha and Vishnu instead of himself? And why did God create these illnesses in the first place? If he’s truly omnipotent, he could have easily prevented all this brain damage from happening. Let’s say that I shoot someone in the leg, and then quickly remove the bullet, disinfect the wound, and wrap it up nicely. Am I worthy of praise for fixing an injury that I myself created? If not, then neither is God. If anything, the existence of illness is used as a powerful argument against the existence of God. Look up the “problem of evil” if you haven’t heard of it.
You also offer me a quote from a book called “The Book of Nature”. Which you say was written in the 18th century, which is before the modern forms of biology, geology, and astronomy emerged. But does the philosophical argument hold up?
Reading the quote, it certainly doesn’t. What do you mean by our solar system being “perfectly aligned”? Our solar system consists of planets of different sizes, which spin and move at different rates. The book’s author seems to think that the way the world is organized now is somehow the perfect and only way it could have been. But what if there were a few more dust particles here, or some mountains moved around there, or if the continents were completely rearranged? Then I assure you Mr. John Mason, and those like him, would have made the same argument. Arguments like that are using backwards logic. With a few changes in variables,  the world could have turned out in any number of different ways. But he assumes that our current world, rather than being one of infinite possible results of natural processes, needed a divine hand to guide it to its current state.
Your argument about the Earth being the perfect distance from the sun is called the “argument from fine tuning”. Modern creationism relies on it. This is yet another argument of yours that can be summarized as “Anytime something weird or interesting happens, it’s because of God”. Do you not think improbable things can happen in a universe without God? Even if the chance is one in a trillion, it could certainly happen in a universe with trillions and trillions of planets. And what difference would it make whether it was Earth or a different planet countless light years away? If humanity evolved on a different star system, and we invented theology, theologians would argue the same things they are right now.
You link an article from the Institute of Creation Research, which is even less reliable than Green Med Info. Which is making the same argument of fine tuning. What if the sun was hotter or colder? Then the so-called “Goldilocks zone” of “not too hot or too cold, but just right” in which we find Earth would be in a different place. The sun and the moon appear to be roughly the same size because the sun is about 400 times larger than the moon, and also about 400 times farther away from us. But what does this matter? Even if this was because of God, what would be the practical purpose of making them appear to be the same size? Wouldn’t it be a better use of God’s time to, say, eliminate all the diseases and natural disasters he’s unleashed upon humanity? Or correct the numerous errors and contradictions in the Bible? I genuinely don’t know how to respond to your arguments when none of them seem to even relate to the premise of the debate.
Your entire round engages in a logical fallacy called the “God of the gaps” fallacy. [2] Science doesn’t claim to be all-knowing or omniscient. So obviously, there are things science doesn’t know and can’t understand right now. But whenever there’s the slightest gap in scientific knowledge, creationists and other fundamentalists leap onto this gap and say “God did it”. Or even claim the existence of these gaps is because science is unreliable. Anytime something strange and unexplained happens, like these rapidly-forming planets you didn’t leave a source for, a scientist’s first instinct is to say “Let’s investigate this and see what’s happening.” Your first instinct is to point to it and say “It was god”. And when we find the evidence that these rapid planets were the result of completely natural processes, groups like the ICR and Answers in Genesis will say “Oh well, that doesn’t matter anyway” and find some other gap to pounce on.
Following your argument, I could ask why God doesn’t turn all animals white during winter, instead of just weasels and rabbits. Or why God didn’t create enough trees to combat climate change. Or how your cherry-picked example of deer and wolves makes sense when there are plenty of examples of the predators eating all the prey, or the prey outnumbering the predator. I hope that next round, you attempt to clarify your statements more. How can you argue that the state of our current world proves the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent God when it could so clearly be improved in so many ways, and turned into something that actually suits his personality? If God so desperately wanted to prove his existence through his own creation, he could just come down from the sky right now and tell us. But of course, that has never happened.
Sources:
1. https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/turmeric-tasty-in-curry-questionable-as-medicine/

i do debates on that subject all the time

i go in depth on this topic here

con did not acknowledged the intelligent choice god made when designing seasonal animals. instead he just said why did he not do this with all animals.

which is like  if i said why did god create orange trees he already had apples.

the weasel turns white during the winter

so god created the weasel white to go with the white snow.

this is an intelligent choice

this is like if i am wearing red pants so i decided to wear a red shirt to go with it

or if Santa wears red cloths so he decides to paint his sleigh red to go with it.

my first link had 7 animals like the weasel

or if i have a blue house so i decide to paint my mailbox blue to go with it

all the planets are circles even the moon are sun are circles. they all move around in a perfect oval around the sun. the planets may be different sizes but come on man life needs variety. different speeds mean nothing there pathways are exactly the same there perfect ovals. so what if there pathways differ

con says my sourcing is unreliable because there views differ from his own.

Perfect numbers
Stephen hawking said

Richard dawkins said

There are the same numbers of electrons to protons

The guy in the article talks about how perfect this is.he uses an example.” so if we were to look at all the human beings on the earth and we found out that it was exactly 50 percent to 50 percent. Not to the nearest million or thousands but exactly one man for one woman. Out of 7 billion people in the world that would freak us all out.” We would be like who is counting us. But this is the case with protons and electrons exactly one proton for one electron. So who counted them out. It was God

This Below taken from this
https://evidencetobelieve.net/fine-tuning-of-the-universe-2/

https://evidencetobelieve.net/fine-tuning-of-the-universe-2/
If any of these numbers are slightly off we do no exist. These  thing were dialed with astonishing precise values. The solar system are not the only thing that have been dialed precisely. Our human body is made up of clocks. Our body has clocks that are dialed so precisely these clocks tell our body to release hormones and other chemicals that our body needs. They release these hormones as if they are aware. Our body releases a chemicals on a precise clock. An example every 8 hours your body releases a chemicals i do not know the details
I know this because wifi frequencies expert Dr. Barrie Trower talks about how 5g doom and gloom messes up these clocks. the new wifi slow kills
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLVIbPtNrVo&t=616s
Also animals are made with precise numbers
These animals have 2 eyes 2 ears 1 nose 1 mouth very precise numbers
Humans 
Cats
Dogs
Goats
Sheep
horses
Giraffes
Monkey 
Weasels
Rats
Elephants
Etc
Most animals consist of 4 legs or 2 legs and 2 arms very precise numbers
Rhino
Bear
Dog 
Cat
Elephant

etc
Most insects have 6 8 12 or 24legs
I just described 99 percent of animals. These are precise numbers
Here is some more precise though i do not understands what it says
quote

Taken from here
http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/designss.html