The Dark Ages & Why Africans Shouldnt Have Saved The European
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 4 votes and with 28 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 8,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
After studying world cultures, religions and history, people tend to not speak about the Dark Ages. Yes, this was an embarrassing time for the white race because Caucasians couldn't get their act together. Documentation proves that Europeans were barbaric in nature and practiced savagery, which can be seen in today's European people. Many people think that if the Africans wouldn't have saved Europeans from their own self-inflicted diseases, then the world would definitely be a better place today because these people cause so much destruction. I think that most people would genuinly agree, but if you think otherwise then you're welcome to accept this challenge.
Disclaimer: Before the racists start labelling me as being racist, just know that reverse racism won't work on me and I'll wear the shoe as long as the shoe fits. I'm here to create dialogue more so than to win debates because the demographics are not in my favor. With that being said, Good Luck.
Hey, sorry I missed this debate. I was on holiday for three weeks.
All I do on a daily basis is work. Guess you have a problem with that?
I may have lost the battle but I certainly won the war.
My view is perfectly proved by the things you do on a daily basis. I'd definitely run out of room displaying your crimes
in which are documented...……...Keyword "documented."
Also, you lost your debate on calling us the original terrorists... doubt you could prove we are the biggest criminals either
The reality is that you don't have an argument and when you get destroyed, spew your stupid excuses,gtfo of here
Lol, saying the truth doesn't matter because white people recorded the stats. Okay, humor me, how do you verify this "reality"? Where are any valid statistics that prove your worldview? I feel I'll be waiting for a while on those...
Lol. Stats that were written by someone of your race who just so happens to be the biggest criminals in history?...Nahhh, I'll stick with the facts of reality.
Yup, one of those idiots
Oh lol, you're one of those "black people can't be racist" fools? Look at the numbers of black on white crime vs white on black crime and you'll see how ridiculous you sound.
Are you discrediting my opinion because i'm white?
How?
Lol. I'm beginning to notice that a lot of these guys are trolls.
He won't rap battle against you because he doesn't want to get flamed.
Yeah "a trip for two weeks" yet you're still accepting debates/debating & been online numerous of times. You had plenty of time to participate in my rap battle, but you decided to ignore, forfeit and chicken out. Good luck in this debate. Easy W for Pro. You didn't even make an argument in R1.
Lmao, *eats popcorn*
An argument about what?
You, a white guy, trying to condemn me, a black guy, for being racist? Do you know how ridiculous you're sounding?
Translation: I just got destroyed and don't have an argument so I am going to make excuses.
Stop the madness.
Racism-prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.
"Murder, theft, ponzi schemes, larceny, sexual abuse, pedophilia, hate crimes, perjury etc...equals the white male."
"Trying to understand these people(whites) is beyond comprehension because the majority of them(whites) are mentally disturbed to a degree. Is there some kind of mental imbalance that makes white males so evil or is it sheer stupidity of their intelligence...or lack thereof?"
Reverse racism exists. Why does it not work.
And you sound like someone with a huge chip on their shoulder.
It ain't hard to figure out who you are. Your illogical comments are a dead giveaway.
Didn't I tell you that reverse racism doesn't work on me? I'm speaking about factual events.
If you can't take the heat, then get out of the kitchen.
...Then anyone would be quite foolish to believe anything that you've said.
True,racism is racism, no need to categorize it into reverse or not
Minor correction: Reverse racism does not exist, as the term racism already covers everything people try to lump inside it.
"Documentation proves that Europeans were barbaric in nature and practiced savagery, which can be seen in today's European people."
Oh yeah,life Africa is SO MUCH BETTER. Fuck you and your racism
OMG, what is with you, reverse racism EXISTS, you fit the textbook definition of racism.
"Murder, theft, ponzi schemes, larceny, sexual abuse, pedophilia, hate crimes, perjury etc...equals the white male."
"Trying to understand these people(whites) is beyond comprehension because the majority of them(whites) are mentally disturbed to a degree. Is there some kind of mental imbalance that makes white males so evil or is it sheer stupidity of their intelligence...or lack thereof?"
oh God,not this shit again.
It was back on DDO, I believe the main debate for it got deleted for hate speech (AKA, someone cried enough about how they could not take a joke), but there's some samples of it remaining: https://www.debate.org/opinions/does-australia-exist
Interesting topic although rather freewheeling with overgeneralization so far. Of course, the Maghreb in its turn would owe much to Europe & Asia. Would the Almohad Caliphate be what it was without Roman colonization, visigothic revitalization, or Byzantine trade? I might argue that the Dark Ages are mostly bullshit, or that the inhabitants of the Barbary (Berber)Coast were definitionally more barbaric than Europeans, whatever the evolution of that word since, or that the Black Plague did more to save Europe than Islamic medicine and trigonometry might ever hope.
And who do you think my people are?
All you have done is delineate a map rather than define an African.
Really? Where?
We debaters proved Australia doesn't exist, so pro can totally win this with the right sources.
The 54 countries that your people created.
Who agrees? Non-European people.
Who agrees that Africans should have never helped the Europeans? How did Africans even help the Europeans in the first place?
Guys, you're basically making a mountain out of a mole hill. Most people would agree that Africans should have never helped the Europeans. The opponent's job is to prove that Europeans never needed the help in the first place.
Ok.
So what is your definition of an African?
How did the Africans 'save' the Europeans from the Dark Ages?
Disagree. I’m still trying to puzzle out your thesis. So Con is “Africans ought to have saved Europeans” which sounds worthwhile enough although I can’t tell to what event(s) the instigator refers- the crusades? The moors?
It isn't hard to understand especially when I've stated "if you think otherwise then you're welcome to accept this challenge."
You need to clarify your proposition, because It makes no sense as it stands.
In your mind:
When does an African become a European or vice versa?