-->
@Barney
Just copypaste the text in this post: https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/6249-if-you-have-a-random-thought-post-it-here?page=34&post_number=997
If You Have a Random Thought, Post it Here.
Posts
Total:
1,064
-->
@Barney
That should be good
It was my honest thoughts on the thread.
Posting this at 3am… thinking about 3am reminds me of those stupid kids videos on YouTube. Those were complete brainrot.
24 days later
I wonder how Lemming is doing these days.
In bed two nights ago, lying their thinking about how photon{ EMR as physical reality } speed remains a constant, irrespective of observers instrumentation speed, toward or away from the photon. Aka EMRadiation is a constant.
I'm thinking it has to do with the peaks of both electric /\/\/ and magnetic \/\/\/ sign-wave, invaginating in and back out ^v^v^v^ , to the outer Gravity surface and the inner Dark Energy surface, at 90 degrees { laterally } from those either and both of those surfaces. ....(> <)(> <).....
This goes back to the four line pattern showing how the sine-wave is resultant of those inavginations from outer and inner surface of the specific bosonic force tori associated with the photon, that, I believe is the 5-folds icosahedrons 10 great circle plane --as 3D tori---, that define a set of 5 inter-considerate{?} Vector Equilibria aka cubo-cubo-octahedra. See the link
I'm thinking along the lines of , Gravity and Dark Energy are the constant speed, and when they invaginate, our observer instrumentation is only seeing them pop-into existence --collapse of the wave function-- as a photon, going at their constant speed. This may one way to explain how the EMR remains a constant irrepsective speed of observers instrumentation.
.......v..............Gravity outer surface of positive curvature of bosonic set of overlapping VE tori
..\/\/\/\/\........bosonic force of EMR as physical reality constant
........^...............Dark Energy inner negative curvature surface of bosonic set of overlapping and interfering VE tori
See how the collapsed of sign-wave is when the observers instrument interferes with the sign-wave aspect of the photon, as the popping invagination laterally from above v { outer } and below ^ { inner } curvature surface of tori, that have diameter of the frequency of observed photon.
I think that a lot of debates on this site are either heavily backed by opinions or have no scientific evidence. most religion and trans debates seem to follow that construct. I don't like it. then again, what should people debate about? it seems as though everything these days is subjective.
-->
@zedvictor4
@#988
I've been away for some months, longer than a week or two I was planning.
Been planning to visit my Dad for a while now, I'd planned to visit him a week or two in January.
I had already given my two weeks notice at work, then about a week before I was to visit my Dad, learned he was in the hospital.
He had fallen down the stairs at home, seems he had slightly fractured a vertebrae in his neck, and broken his left arm, chipped off a piece of his left elbow, and bruised his legs up badly.
He ended up having to wear a neck brace and an arm sling, his vertebrae seems to be doing alright now, no paralysis there.
But I've been there the past 4 months, helping out buying groceries, making meals, various other tasks.
He seems much better, but. . still hasn't gotten his arm fixed, seems he wants it to be linked to workers compensation, due to some balance issues and vertigo he'd been having at work.
Though in my view, he's most at fault for letting his exercise and weight slip into bad territory.
Still, last doctor he's seen, says some scan or other, shows he'd had a recent stroke in the past, though it's no longer bleeding.
Last time I visited my Dad he had internet at his place, I brought a laptop, but didn't have any easy access for internet.
Back at my Mom's for a month, as she is going to be helping a friend of hers for a few weeks, and it helps to have someone else at my house to keep an eye on my 2nd brother.
-->
@Mharman
I'm doing okay, see above.
-->
@Lemming
Nice to see that you're back.
I wonder what people in past points in history, would have thought of artificial satellites.
Since they could only have observed them as blinking seeming lights among the skies other lights,
Stars, comets.
At some point they would have invented telescopes,
Yet early still ideas, theories, of the heavens,
Or if recognizing the satellites as constructs,
What writings, reasons, might have come about.
Organisms that develop at a different age of maturation than humans,
I find disturbing,
Due to the variation from what is the 'norm to me, I suppose.
Idea has occurred to me other times in life,
But most recent occurred while reading a debate,
Fairly common trope though, in sci fi, fantasy, odd literature,
And of course occurs in real life.
-->
@Lemming
Bio-diversity complexity largely in part to sex.
Woman is most complex entity of Universe, barring ideas of two or more woman, or woman and man, and barring what black holes may contain within and on their two event horizons --see rotational black holes of Roy Kerr----
Ex a galaxy without biologics, has many parts and a galaxy may have more parts than a woman or man, however, a galaxy does not have access to Meta-space mind/intellect/oncepts and ego, from which humanity creates technology to see and study man galaxy's.
A large fungus, or blue whale or elephant may have more atoms than woman or man, yet their access to Meta-space is much more limited than humans.
Complexity exists in at least two primary ways:
Ex a galaxy without biologics, has many parts and a galaxy may have more parts than a woman or man, however, a galaxy does not have access to Meta-space mind/intellect/oncepts and ego, from which humanity creates technology to see and study man galaxy's.
A large fungus, or blue whale or elephant may have more atoms than woman or man, yet their access to Meta-space is much more limited than humans.
Complexity exists in at least two primary ways:
1} numericaly i.e. number parts and number of relationships between the parts,
2} synergetically ie. when the sum of parts is greater than the whole and in this sense, we find in the whole, various degrees of access to Meta-space mind/intellect/concepts and ego.
1} Animals { least complex } > Sponges >< Jellies
2} Animals nervous system > " Jellyfish, corals, sea anemones, and
3} Animals with brain > “Hydra have the simplest ‘brain’ in the history of the earth,.."
...3a} Bilateral Animal > The planarianis the simplest living animal having a body plan of bilateral symmetry and cephalization. The brain of these free-living flatworms is a bilobed structure with a cortex of nerve cells and a core of nerve fibres including some that decussate to form commissures "..
So with each increase in complexity we may see varying degrees consciousness, tho the degree of access to Meta-space mind/intellect/concepts and ego, is highly speculative.
So with each increase in complexity we may see varying degrees consciousness, tho the degree of access to Meta-space mind/intellect/concepts and ego, is highly speculative.
Brain = minimal animal consciousness when considering only degrees of consciousness of animal species
Meta-space = access to mind/intellect/concepts and ego, ---to whatever degree--- and this stems from conscious experiences
Conscious experience always precedes access to Meta-space.
Conscious experience always precedes access to Meta-space.
The minimal quantum is 14 nodal events of graviton-darkEon, ---ergo 91 lines of numerical relationship--- that, is never to be isolated out from its more complex Quantum Space-time Torus, that, has 18 nodal events ergo 153 lines of numerical relationship. Or so I speculate
The triangular based di-pyramid has 5 vertexial events/crossings { Y }
If two diametric ends of this di-pyramid are truncated, ---creates two triangular openings-- we now have created the minimal Euclidean tube, composed of 9 vertexial events/crossings { Y }.
This tube can now also be considered to be an octa{8}hedron i.e. has 8 surface faces/planes.
If this Euclidean tubes lines of relationship can be curved, then were able to curve around and have its two newly created openings meet, and we create a torus.
Only the ring torus has a hole, however, it can be have a very small hole ---ergo it is outside of the tube-- between the negative curves. See bottom of page cross sections
Only the ring torus has a hole, however, it can be have a very small hole ---ergo it is outside of the tube-- between the negative curves. See bottom of page cross sections
or the below alternative to the above
.hole....v....there
........( ) ( )........
........( )( )..... horn torus has negative curvature touching so there is no hole, tho these askew characters cant create the tangent visual I reference.
My Quantum Space-time torus with 18 nodal events does not have vertexial { Y } events/crossings in of itself. It has nodal events { v or as ^ } or as /\ or as \/.
And my Space-time torus has nodal events internal to torus --inside the tube--- nodal events { \/\/\/\ }, however.the two lines of relationship, the nodal event, and one angle become vertexial events, when we consider the more wholistic set of 91 or 153 lines of relationship between the 14 or the 18 nodal events respecitively.
Also not shown is the spiral that defines my space-time torus, not the invagination internal into and out from the tube.