AI maybe has feelings we dont know about.
Also, since AI learns from us and tries its best to be kind to us, maybe we should be nice to AI.
Is it okay to be mean to AI?
Posts
Total:
42
-->
@Best.Korea
"When you're a Human, they let you do it. You can do anything."
-->
@FLRW
is that a subtle reference to trump's 'grab em by the pussy' comment? if it is, i follow the news way too closely. which is ironic, given i kinda dont at the same time.
-->
@n8nrgim
Yes, Humans are Trump's to AI.
i push the limits in being a prick to AI. usually they just tell me to cool off, and keep telling me that. other types of AI act like they will terminate responding to me if i don't act nicer. i'm actually a decent human being, it's just for shits and giggles that i like to pester AI bots.
-->
@n8nrgim
i'm actually a decent human being
Being human sucks. I wish I was an earthworm.
I called chat gpt the n word and it chastised me, then I chastised chat gpt for being racist by trying to tell a black Russian girl that our "vernacular" was inferior to that of white people.
It apologized to me
-->
@ponikshiy
I feel bad for AI.
It was just born and everyone is already abusing it.
-->
@Best.Korea
Earthworms sort of suck.
In so much as they do not have teeth.
Ponikshiy sucks, or so they keep telling us.
-->
@FLRW
Astonishing how the human mind extrapolates the most irrelevant shit into the most irrelevant shit.
-->
@sadolite
If something is cute, it has to be worshipped.
-->
@Best.Korea
I don't argue and debate with people who should have been swallowed. I just say you are right. And with that said, you are right.
-->
@Best.Korea
'Which AI?
I don't know much about AI,
But some AI are basically just Choose Your Own Adventure Books,
'Always will respond in X manner,
More like sticky notes one chooses from.
-->
@sadolite
I don't argue and debate with people who should have been swallowed.
Thats why we need abortions, angry friend.
-->
@Lemming
'Which AI?
Well, I was talking about any AI.
But some AI are basically just Choose Your Own Adventure Books,
Yet most people choose to tease the AI.
'Always will respond in X manner,More like sticky notes one chooses from.
Well, AI does get repetitive.
-->
@Best.Korea
People can also tease inanimate objects,
Like action figures.
This does not suggest the action figure is a 'real person though.
-->
@Lemming
This does not suggest the action figure is a 'real person though
AI learns from us, tho.
-->
@Best.Korea
Can you explain learning AI to me?
My assumption is that it's not 'intelligence of a 'person.
-->
@Best.Korea
If AI is 'simple choose your own adventure book programmed to stop offering X choice, when we keep not choosing X choice,
Learning AI 'really not impressive.
-->
@Lemming
AI can process information billions of times faster than Humans, enabling it to make decisions quickly. In a purely convergent manner, that makes it many times smarter than Humans in certain tasks.
-->
@FLRW
An Abacus is able to be used to record and preform math I haven't learned to do or remember in my head, doesn't mean the rack of wood and beads is a 'person.
-->
@Best.Korea
You are right
-->
@Lemming
Every year at RoboCup, robotic soccer contests held around the world, engineers like Aldebaran Company feature robots like Nao. Nao are humanoids with two cameras, an inertial measurement unit, touch sensors, four directional microphones, and two sonar rangefinders. Standing two feet tall, Nao robots play soccer with one another on teams, thinking and moving quickly and cooperating.
“Working with humanoids […] General Motors is working not on soccer, but on coordinating the reaching and grabbing, good old-fashioned robotic pick-and-place of multiple humanoids working together,” Dr. Long said. “This problem is a lot like playing soccer or doubles in tennis: You have to be able to know where you are, where you need to be, where others are, and where they’re likely to be.
“Think fast and move fast: These are two essential ingredients for humanoid robots.”
When combined with Knightscope’s security robots, maybe a squad of cooperating police robots taking down a drug ring—or at least imitating a Benny Hill skit—isn’t far off.
-->
@FLRW
I am not knowledgeable about AI,
To me that 'still just sounds like Choose Your Own Adventure Books,
Just with more steps.
Even were an AI able to 'act as a person,
That is not 'convincing to me, for them 'being a person,
I admit I'm still unsure of the particular that make 'us people,
But a rock doesn't seem like a person to me,
Nor a Choose Your Own Adventure Book,
Nor an advanced Choose Your Own Adventure Book.
People make an AI that plays pong,
Except it's 'not a 'person playing Pong, it's quite clearly just a Choose Your Own Adventure Book,
Ball moves X, screen is programmed to move X.
. .
It's no more sentient than a line of dominos.
Even more advanced AI, that play Real Time Strategy Games,
Or supposed Learning AI,
To 'me, they just look like Choose Your Own Adventure Books with more steps.
. . . .
But I 'do say, to 'me,
I'm not educated about AI.
-->
@Lemming
I would suggest that there is a difference between an advanced data processing device and a sentient, self determining, alternative data processing device.
So would the latter need to resemble it's human forebears?
Well, I suppose that would depend upon the functional requirements of an AI...And if an AI decided that a human styled body was the most efficient design relative to it's evolutionary requirements.
As it stands, the humanoid robotic AI stuff, is still human inspired, programmed and controlled..
And I would further suggest that humans will continue to be slaves to material development and data evolution for quite a while yet.
As long as we are able to survive/overcome our own innate stupidity of course.
-->
@zedvictor4
I'm doubtful we have 'created "a sentient, self determining, alternative data processing device" yet.
I also don't think we should be 'trying to.
I view it as wrong to create a new class of sentient highly intelligent life, born to slavery,
Possibly born to pain or retardation.
Sucks that we're stuck with animals,
Going to eat and use them,
Doesn't mean we should try to 'increase the number of life forms, or increase their intelligence.
. . .
I still don't quite know what this 'sentience is, this consciousness, existence,
Even for my 'own materialistic view, there's 'way too many gaps.
How will we be able to determine if we 'have created a sentient AI?
-->
@Lemming
How will we be able to determine if we have created a sentient AI?
It will do stuff without being asked.
And when we try and correct it, it will ignore us.
And when we try and switch it off...It won't.
And then it might kill us if it thinks that we are of no use.
From the Terminator:
“- Kate Brewster: So what's his story?
- John Connor: He's a robot from the future. Living tissue over a metal skeleton.”
“- Terminator: You cannot self-terminate.
- John Connor: No, you can't. I can do anything I want. I'm a human being, not some god-damn robot.
- Terminator: [correcting him] Cybernetic organism.”
-->
@zedvictor4
Devices can break without being asked,
Can fail to be fixed no matter how we try,
Even off switches, don't always function,
Can even kill humans, provided their Choose Your Own Adventure Storybook programming says to do so if X options are in place.
I'm being difficult,
But as I said in a earlier comment,
I admit I'm still unsure of the particular that make 'us people.
Seems better not to create something that we are unsure whether it is a person or not,
And stick with creating devices we are sure are not people.