Who can assume the presidency of the united states?
According to the United States Constitution any man who can show the best connection to the conditions of the American Consitution Preamble. The restrictions of Exsecutive office is often regulated by a condition to hold certian political "Office." This is why acording to United States Constitutional Law Kamala Haris will never be a Vice President she is not a man the state of the union which best describes her is "Presadera." She simply does not hold the Oval Office by election of the people. A female President is a argument of criminal legilsation as law and there has been little done in the way of proper constitutional legilsation to corect all the words "he" as united State Constitutional Right.
Both the 15th and 19th Amendments are conditional and in essence we can simple combine the two inwriting “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not bedenied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex, race, color, and or previous condition of servitude." America's United State Constitutional “More perfect Right” is to describe "she" in the Articles, Sections, and Clause of American Constitution and add an independent word of representation such as Presadera. Not that it must be that word it is only used here for total lack of all United State Constitutional Right. Thus, we the people are allowed to hold all women as created equal to each otherwithout the use of crime in legislation. This is the far superior United State of Right as there are no accusations of wrong by association to crime. .
: to take as granted or true
: SUPPOSE
All men are created equal by their creator as a President of the United States of America by displayed abilities to serve, protect and defend United State Constitutional Right by Oath of Office, Exsecutive Office. No Crime. No SNAFU. For the record as a whole truth, it is fact that a person who splits the American 1st Amendment apart like a lawyer by claiming only “freedom of speech” is not showing an ability to serve, protect, or defend American United States Constitutional Right, they are self-representing themselves in court tward criminal law instead. Saying it is a crime to limit what a Lawyer or Judge might say inside acourt of law when practicing law. I want some of that. This changes outside a court of law, however, as United State Constitutional Right can be sought to share the common defense of no cost so that We the people of this United State might share this liberty without prejudice of judicial criminal legislation, as filed criminal legilsation is literal organized crime. Refusing to commit perjury as it is understood outside a court of law is not an act of discrimination of any kind it may simply appear that way without equal representation, questioning taxation without representation.
