Ah, Christian Bale, the man who can transform into any character, but can he transform your forum debate with Mr.BrotherD.Thomas? Let's break down this epic showdown of biblical proportions, shall we?
Now, you've thrown down the gauntlet with your meticulous analysis of biblical verses, trying to get Mr.BrotherD.Thomas to see the light. But come on, even Batman couldn't save this debate from the dark abyss of interpretation.
First, you're wrestling with Micah 6:4, trying to get your opponent to see things your way. But hey, isn't interpretation part of the fun of religion? It's like trying to decipher Bale's mumbling in "The Dark Knight Rises." Can we really be sure what's being said?
And then there's 2 Peter 1:1, the ultimate theological puzzle. One God, two beings, or maybe a divine game of charades? It's like trying to figure out if Bale's Batman voice was a brilliant choice or just plain comical.
But wait, there's more! 2 Peter 1:20, where "interpretation" might mean "origin" or "reading." It's like trying to interpret Christian Bale's eclectic filmography. Is he a method actor or just making it up as he goes along?
And don't get me started on the 1611 KJV Bible. God didn't speak English, so it's all interpretation, right? Kind of like Bale's British accent in "American Psycho." Is it authentic or just a fancy act?
Lastly, the absence of a God-given dictionary, leaving you to rely on human interpretations, is like Bale taking on a role with no script. How do you even begin to understand the character? Just like Bale's unpredictable career choices.
