Meta-time is the macro-infinite, and truly non-occupied space { .....space.... } that, embraces/surrounds our finite, occupied space { ....@....} Universe. Simple.
Simple [email protected]........ Simple is as simple does. Where is Zed when we need him?
Note: meta-physical is Gravity and Dark Energy because neither of those are quantised and my guess is, never will be quanatised by any creature of Universe, because was ultra-micro scales of existence is 10 ^ -36 . So to be clear we have Meta-space, Meta-time and Meta-physical ergo Cosmic Trinary Set of Meta/Beyond.
Note: meta-physical is Gravity and Dark Energy because neither of those are quantised and my guess is, never will be quanatised by any creature of Universe, because was ultra-micro scales of existence is 10 ^ -36 . So to be clear we have Meta-space, Meta-time and Meta-physical ergo Cosmic Trinary Set of Meta/Beyond.
Occupied space can only exist as time, however, to be clear, observed { quantized } time is not occupied space Gravity nor occupied space Dark Energy, as those two have not, most likely never will be quantized.
Lee Smolin of Loop Quantum Gravity fame, says it would take a particle accelerator, the size of our solar system, to ever harness enough power to pop-out a isolated graviton. A graviton-darkEon existence is at 10^ -36 meters in size. That numerical is approximately this:
0 . 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, 001
A proton is 10^ -15 meters 0 . 000, 000, 000, 001
Understand powering is not a doubling operation as in addition. I.e. 10^ -36 is much much much more than just, twice as small as proton. Powering is an expoential function. 10 = base unit. ^ -36 = expoential power function.
If your still not clear on how this powering is increasing that value then you can go to this site to see a visual along with the numbers. With 3 points we have 3 lines-of-relationship and we have ratio of numerical equality i.e. a 1 to 1 { 1:1 } relationship of points and lines-of-relationship.
With 4 points we leap to 6 lines-of-relationship and that is increase of two lines-of-relationship over the points. Here we have and numerical increase of 6:4 ratio
With 5 points we leap to 10 lines-of-relationship and that is a leap of 5 lines-of-relationship over the points and 10:5 ratio and this is a doubling ratio of increase.
With 6 points we have a 15:6 ratio of increase