CNN tries to pull a Cathy Newmann on Vivek

Also, for context, this is the standard definition of Cathy Newmaning

A quick breakdown of the video:

CNN: Questioning the government means you are toeing the line for conspiracy theories.

Vivek: A) The government DID lie. B) I never said 911 was an inside job. C) We should never be smeared for asking questions about the Government, especially when we know they lied to us.

What do you guys think?

So you are saying that we should burn down CNN. That might cause more violence and wouldnt help with anything.

Sorry, I am just Cathy Newmaning you at this moment.

I always knew you were the smartest.

Remember that Vivek Ramaswamy burst onto the biotech scene a few years ago with a brash plan to grab a failed drug from GlaxoSmithKline and hustle it straight into a pivotal Phase III study for Alzheimer’s — a disease that has defeated every pivotal shot taken at it over the past 15 years.

As a government outsider whose popularity is steadily rising, it is imperative that he be sidelined by any means necessary.

Do you think Vivek handled the straw-manning well?

Now this is a great post. So thoughtful. So much effort. Now I know why you get so annoyed by spam. I mean this post of yours should be published. It should be talked about on CSPAN and all the Sunday talk shows. 

He has handled himself well in every interview I have seen, whether it be hostile or agreeable… which is why he must be stopped.

He’s not a Christian so he has no chance as a Republican. They wouldn’t even support Romney 

You might be right, but Romney is not a good example because he won the Republican nomination in 2012.

I appreciate your insight.

Without strong support from evangelicals. They said Mormons were cult followers