how Donald trump's indictment could backfire on Joe biden

Author: Greyparrot

Posts

Total: 17
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10

Turley talks about how the recent indictment of former President Donald Trump could end up causing major problems for President Joe Biden. Even though Trump's charges are related to the 2020 election, they could have an unexpected impact on Biden. Turley points out that the indictment against Trump is based on limited new evidence and shaky legal grounds. It's about trying to make what Trump said into a crime, even though it is likely to be protected by the First Amendment. If Biden views this as personal, he might be onto something, as these legal tactics will probably also be used against him. The way Trump's words led others to act could also be used against Biden own words doing the same, especially in an impeachment inquiry by Republicans in the House of Representatives. Biden has been accused of disregarding the Constitution, such as pushing unconstitutional measures and allegedly lying about his knowledge of his son's overseas business deals. There is quite the irony that the legal standards being used against Trump could also be used against Biden, and that could make things very problematic for him.

Do you guys think a can of worms has been opened here?
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,618
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
The Fox News host Chris Wallace invited Trump to deliver a two-minute statement. And he was off:
So when I listen to Joe [Biden] talking about a transition, there has been no transition from when I won. I won that election. And if you look at crooked Hillary Clinton, if you look at all of the different people, there was no transition, because they came after me trying to do a coup. They came after me spying on my campaign … We’ve got it all on tape. We’ve caught ’em all. And by the way, you gave the idea for the Logan Act against General Flynn. You better take a look at that, because we caught you in a sense, and President Obama was sitting in the office. He knew about it, too. So don’t tell me about a free transition. As far as the ballots are concerned, it’s a disaster. A solicited ballot, okay, solicited, is okay. You’re soliciting. You’re asking. They send it back. You send it back. I did that. If you have an unsolicited—they’re sending millions of ballots all over the country. There’s fraud. They found ’em in creeks …
And so on, until the end of the second minute, when Wallace attempted to break in and end the monologue. He tried five times before regaining temporary control.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Best.Korea
Do you think a can of worms has been opened here?
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,618
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Greyparrot
"No you" was always the strongest tool of every politician, even in this day.
Or as Hitler's supporters said: "Blame others for that which we are guilty of".
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Best.Korea
Do you think a can of worms has been opened here?
TWS1405_2
TWS1405_2's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 2,186
3
3
7
TWS1405_2's avatar
TWS1405_2
3
3
7
-->
@Greyparrot
Yes, I do. For sure. 
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,509
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
Sometimes I think this is all part of a master plan elaborated by Trump with the only aim of getting more votes. I mean, judging by the polls and the conviction that Trump is going to come out unscathed as he always did.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,062
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Greyparrot
It will eventually all boil down to how stupidly or sensibly the voting public choose to behave.

And Jonathon Turley as per U.S. social  expectation, is politically biased.

HistoryBuff
HistoryBuff's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,222
3
3
3
HistoryBuff's avatar
HistoryBuff
3
3
3
-->
@Greyparrot
Turley points out that the indictment against Trump is based on limited new evidence and shaky legal grounds
limited evidence? They just turned over more than a million pages of evidence. There are countless witnesses and documentation for his conspiracy. There is a mountain of evidence. 

and "shaky grounds" is right wing cope. The grounds are very clear. He and his co-conspirators engaged in a conspiracy to overturn the results of the election. That isn't shaky grounds.

It's about trying to make what Trump said into a crime
you are aware that any charge of fraud or conspiracy is about what someone said right? People go to prison for "what they said" all the time. It isn't uncommon. But that take is also wrong. Conspiracy certainly includes what someone said, as this is part of the conspiracy. But no charge of conspiracy can be laid unless they have taken actions other than just talking. 

even though it is likely to be protected by the First Amendment.
this is more right wing cope. Conspiracy is absolutely not protected. It's like this. If you and friends all said "hey, we should rob bank", but all you do it talk, then it's not illegal. That is protected. But if you then go out and get masks and guns, now it is a conspiracy and you are guilty. If all trump did was talk about overturning the election, he would be protected. The moment he and his co-conspirators took steps toward actually doing it (coercing pence, setting up the fake electors etc) they became guilty of conspiracy. So no, the moment they took action in furtherance of the plot, they passed out of protected speech.  Any "expert" telling you it is all about what he said and is protected by the 1st amendment is either an idiot or a liar. 

The way Trump's words led others to act could also be used against Biden own words doing the same, especially in an impeachment inquiry by Republicans in the House of Representatives.
I really don't see how. The republicans don't have any evidence biden has committed any crime at all. I'm 100% sure they will pretend that biden is the same as trump, they will be lying of course. 

Biden has been accused of disregarding the Constitution, such as pushing unconstitutional measures and allegedly lying about his knowledge of his son's overseas business deals.
so he is accused of doing things that are not illegal. and?

There is quite the irony that the legal standards being used against Trump could also be used against Biden, and that could make things very problematic for him.
no, it couldn't. Trump is charged in a conspiracy to overturn an election. Biden isn't charged with anything and the republicans have yet to point to a single specific crime they think he has committed. They just ramble about random "corruption". The other day some republican in congress said they would bring articles of impeachment for drugs and prostitution, despite there never being any evidence biden engaged in either of those things. Bottom line, the impeachment talk against biden is all a political show. There is a decent chance they will never actually impeach him and just drag out an "investigation" until the election, because impeaching him is stupid. And even if they did, it would just help biden because the stupidity of their impeachment will be obvious. 

Do you guys think a can of worms has been opened here?
It is absolutely new territory to charge a president with crimes. So in that sense, yes a can of worms has been opened. The idea that this will blow back and work against biden is pretty silly. comparing trump's very real crimes for which he is likely to be convicted to the silly nonsense the republicans are throwing around is just rightwing cope. They know trump is guilty so they have to try and make people think biden is guilty too, despite having no evidence of that. 
HistoryBuff
HistoryBuff's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,222
3
3
3
HistoryBuff's avatar
HistoryBuff
3
3
3
-->
@IlDiavolo
Sometimes I think this is all part of a master plan elaborated by Trump with the only aim of getting more votes. I mean, judging by the polls and the conviction that Trump is going to come out unscathed as he always did.
i wasn't aware going to prison was considered "unscathed"
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,509
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@HistoryBuff
Why so sure? We'll see. 😁
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@zedvictor4
It will eventually all boil down to how stupidly or sensibly the voting public choose to behave.

The voting public isn't responsible for the bad behavior of the elite anymore because they have lost control of the game.
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
The voting public isn't responsible for the bad behavior of the elite anymore because they have lost control of the game.
-The Big Game, O’Brian

zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,062
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Greyparrot
Maybe so.

But the voting public will still have a choice to make.

And they will dutifully do so, thereby installing the next group elite into office.

An elite funded by an elite.

And I would suggest that bad behaviour is not limited to the elite.

It's just that elite badness is more media juicy.


Hierarchy and increasing levels of corruption is how social systems work.


So let's say that you good ole American folk stage a successful coup d'etat.

So what then?

A socialist utopia.

No chance.

Someone's always going to be doing the leading and the rest are always going to be following.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@zedvictor4
But the voting public will still have a choice to make.
You mean the illusion of choice.

A socialist utopia.
That's an Oxymoron.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,062
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Greyparrot
You mean the illusion of choice
For sure.


That's an oxymoron
Undoubtedly.


I was being cynical.

You knew that?
HistoryBuff
HistoryBuff's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,222
3
3
3
HistoryBuff's avatar
HistoryBuff
3
3
3
-->
@IlDiavolo
Why so sure? We'll see
why am I sure he committed the crimes he committed publicly? maybe because he committed them quite publicly. For example, he has publicly admitted he had the classified documents and I have heard a tape of him showing classified documents he illegally possessed to other people. He also very publicly pushed for fake electors to be sent and publicly pushed for mike pence to overthrow the election results. 

There isn't really any doubt that he is guilty. Everyone could watch him commit some of them in real time. And others, we have seen him admit to them or have heard recordings of him committing them.