Almost no debate here. Maybe 2 or three people a day show up
This forum is dead
Posts
Total:
38
-->
@Vegasgiants
Glad to be a part of the two or three.
ok lol
i mean debates are basically dead in that regard tooo
There's like 1 debate per like 3 days or smth. dead site ??!?!?!?!?!
I wouldnt say that this site is dead at all.
This site has about 20 active users. Of course they cant debate all the time. I see good debates here often.
On other sites, you will mostly get insults, people misunderstanding your point intentionally, and no actual debates at all.
This site at least offers some higher intellectual discussions.
-->
@Average_Person
I like your fungus, tree, nuclear explosion etc icon-graphic.
-->
@ebuc
Thanks, I didn't make it; AI did.
-->
@Average_Person
AI, a technological child of humans access to Meta-space mind/intellect etc
Same goes for AGI that is more complex, tho will never be as complex as human.
Contrary to Zeds evolutionary concepts about AI or AGI.
Contrary to Zeds evolutionary concepts about AI or AGI.
-->
@ebuc
@Average_Person
A thought I had a bit ago,
How 'much participation is required to say an individual 'made something?
I did not pain the portrait, the brush and oil and canvas did,
Many painters 'did go for a photorealism, rather than personal touch, as 'much as a camera as possible,
But 'still I'd think, 'very intentional, very much effort throughout.
I did not build the building, the workers did,
Yet architects designed the plans, bosses directed to workers, someone financed.
I didn't design the art, the artists did,
Yet the end product of a video game, 'someone selects, intentionally brought about.
Yet I feel you,
Be silly if someone ordered someone else to paint something, then claimed they painted it themself,
Yet, a hand of many, in what came to be, still is had.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forum still has 'some activity,
But could be more active I suppose,
Niche site,
I compare it to Reddit or a WoW forum, but those platforms are 'huge in popularity.
-->
@Average_Person
There's like 1 debate per like 3 days or smth. dead site ??!?!?!?!?!
FFS, people have lives you know.
In the rated (even unrated) debate side of this site, it takes time to devote to researching, typing, editing, proof reading, and then posting responses. It’s a two-way street in that regard for both pro and con. It takes time.
People have to be willing to devote time to official debates where it is easier to engage others in the FORUM section where there is no time restriction, or requirements to meet for soliciting votes to win a debate.
Your whiners just need to take a seat in the back of the bus and stop crying wolf (err, Rosa Parks…rather, Claudette Colvin) and just STFU!
I mean really, I am retired and I won’t engage others in an official debate unless it is a topic I am passionate about. I did that once, and screwed myself because I wanted to be Pro but I made myself Con and had to debate as Devil’s advocate. I think I did a pretty good job, and got feedback affirming such, but still lost as it I was a losing argument nonetheless.
Plus, I won’t engage anyone unless I feel they are worthy of the debate. I am not going to engage the likes of IWantRoseveltAgain or BestKorea because they have no interest in legit debate. None whatsoever.
Others here are too pompous to engage, like Double_R, for example. Their intellectual cowardice even precedes their condescension. Just a waste of time. But I still enjoy poking that bear in the forum section though.
-->
@TWS1405_2
It’s just a half hour whenever man. A new debate opening up is once in a blue moon it closes in like .5 hr
-->
@Average_Person
No, it’s not how it works.
The one debate I started lasted a few days because we take into account people have lives and it takes time to research and prepare well thought out positions.
Stop whining for fucks sake.
who tf said I was
-->
@Average_Person
I will debate if I find time, regarding this, I say all pushing-outware phenomena of Universe, is resultant of pulling-inward phenomena. Easy to just do it here or in another thread. The debate system is flawed
-->
@Lemming
How 'much participation is required to say an individual 'made something?
For a poem or song etc not much. Just our experience, and that is true of your of all the participaing individuals experience.
Experience precede Meta-space creation of this that or other.
From Time To Time
...ebuc.....
Practice,"over time",
Makesbetter, "in time",
Whatever,"takes time".
Inspite of, "limited time",
Wefind, "the time",
Andpossibly we resonate, "with time".
Wemay also "extend or shorten time",
Relativeto the "sum-total of time",
Beingthat there are those who take their "sweet time",
Andothers who are constantly running "out of time".
Soit happens there is "no time",
Ina Universe that is "full of time",
Andthose who keep "track of time",
Warningus of the coming "end of time."
Ihave no illusions "about time",
Norabout the theories "surrounding time",
Ido know that there is "a time",
Toforget "about time."
Alas,this is the end of "my time",
Talkingof endless ideas "involving time",
Andallowing me a one final concept "concerning time."
Thatall people on occasion, hopefully, "have a good time."
-->
@Average_Person
who tf said I was
Who in the flying FUCK are you even replying to!?!
Helps of you select the proper options, if in the least point out specifically WHO you are replying to in your vague retorts.
-->
@TWS1405_2
Are you legitimately that angry over someone being unhappy that DART is unpopular?
Lmao
Also kinda obvious
CONTEXT FALLACY!!!!!
Don’t reply to my comments if you block me.
Every time you do, just proves what an impotent pussy you are.
That is stating an observable FACT, not an ad hominem.
-->
@ebuc
Yes, might as well press the space key a bit more times, it is large and it is missing in some parts, namely between the first two words in a line.
-->
@Intelligence_06
Sorry, I forgot to check it after posting. This always happens when I copy from my word text document. Have found no way to fix this issue before I post.
Debateart is great.
Even the whining kids.
Sort of mostly boys under 25.
Probably not currently in meaningful relationships.
Only jibing.
Though Debateart is still great.
That is stating an observable FACT, not an ad hominem.
Some people are ugly. Calling them ugly is an observable fact. Yet still an ad hominem.
The most popular debate on here now is over the forum being dead
I can't wait until a Psychiatrist starts reviewing posts.
-->
@FLRW
Look forward to read your evaluation.
-->
@Best.Korea
That is stating an observable FACT, not an ad hominem.Some people are ugly. Calling them ugly is an observable fact. Yet still an ad hominem.
No, it’s truth. Truth =/= an ad hominem fallacy.
No, it’s truth. Truth =/= an ad hominem fallacy.
Okay lol
-->
@Vegasgiants
And we are the walking, typing dead.
DOA ?
Clinically brain dead ?
DOA ?
Clinically brain dead ?
...Dead Humans Forum/forest.....?