So you copied my thread but removed voters from the equation.
Honestly, if you're going to accuse me of copying your thread.
Please consider the purpose of your forum post was something I came up with months ago as the main theme for my Tournament.
Not yours.
Default categories for this debate will be Politics, Science, History, Religion, Sociology, Fiction, Pop Culture. (Possibly more.) But where this tournament differs from the rest is that topics/subjects will be personalized to match each competitors’ strengths in order to ensure they are operating under the best circumstances possible. (Like an algorithm.)
Additionally, type which categories are your favorite (or you’re best at.) if you decide.
Sign-ups continue until we get 10 participants and will run until next Tuesday. Extended, if necessary.
If anything, you liked it so much that you ripped off my idea.
4) You state whether your intent is to debate it, which side you prefer to debate and/or whether you want to vote on it. If you would only debate/vote if it's within a certain range of characters or time-away-from now, feel free to specify that.
This is a very obvious solution I am sure many regular debaters and voters have thought 'should' exist but didn't really make happen yet. I am not some 'genius' for this, it is just going to become an official thread where willing and eager voters meet willing and eager debaters so that debaters can engage on topics at times when the voters interested in those topics are available to vote, without needing it to be 'judge debate' format that has to be unrated or any other such complication.
I'm assuming you included the part that you're "not a genius" as a way to undermine your deceptiveness by making it seem like everyone else's idea, so you couldn't be accused of what you really did, plagiarizing my Tournament Origin.
Not that I care particularly. More power to you for pulling off such a bold and daring power-move.
However, I cannot applaud your dishonesty and lack of integrity.
