-->
@Greyparrot
NBC DESPERATELY Defends We're Coming For Your Children Chant, Accidentally CONFIRMS They're Groomers
Is there a legitimate point you heard anywhere in this video?
They'er "communing for our kids"
Posts
Total:
41
-->
@Double_R
I think GP is Tim Pool. He says exactly the same things.
-->
@Double_R
Didn't post it for you.
-->
@Greyparrot
I watched the video. Look at the third comment from a Youtube user dontask8979 and his replies.. I'm telling you that the pressure cooker is about to explode. They are pushing too hard.
-->
@DavidAZ
What makes you think that you are not the bigot and you are actually supporting the bigot view? Why am I the bigot for thinking that gay is perversion?
Let's start with the definition of a bigot:
"a person who is intolerant or hateful toward people whose race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, etc., is different from the person's own."
I am not gay and clearly you are not either. Yet I am tolerant of any individuals freedom to be gay while you are not. That means you are the literal example of a bigot while I am the literal example of it's antonym. Basic English.
But beyond plain English, your position that gay is a perversion reduces to utter absurdity. Being gay simply means that a man is sexually attracted to other men as opposed to women. If being attracted to other men is perversion than every straight woman on earth is also perverted because they are as well, attracted to men. And there is no reason why being sexually attracted to men is perverted but not to women, so that would qualify as well. But by this point the definition has now expanded to anyone who is sexually attracted to either... Which means any sexual attraction at all, rendering the term completely meaningless. Your claim is therefore, logically, inherently, self defeating.
It is none of those things to say that sexual perversion is good.
You are the one pretending that gay = sexual perversion, not us. You entire opposition is just one big strawman.
Gay men don't want to have sex with women. Lesbian women don't want men. Therefore, no kids can be produced. The lineage stops. So in order to have the gay agenda grow, they need to convert another child to propagate the gay agenda.
Please explain something to me... If this is what it takes to "continue the gay lineage", how do you account for the fact that every gay child born came from straight parents?
-->
@Double_R
how do you account for the fact that every gay child born came from straight parents?
Good question. Because they choose to be gay. BTW, what if I said I was born to dislike gay people? Would you tell me I was a bigot then? I'm sure I could make up some sort of research to support my views.
pretending that gay = sexual perversion
Did I make it look like I was pretending? My apologies for not being clearer about this. Being gay does equal sexual perversion.
And there is no reason why being sexually attracted to men is perverted but not to women, so that would qualify as well.
Oxford dictionary of perversion: the alteration of something from its original course, meaning, or state to a distortion or corruption of what was first intended.
It is okay for a man(male) to be attracted to a woman(female). That's how it started from any creation or evolution background.
literal example
You are a literal example of an intellectual push over and groomer supporter for thinking this stuff is okay and for thinking that it is going to stop at just gayness. Use your damn brain. It is corrupt and it will soon reach to all areas of sexual perversion. Incest, bestiality, pedophilia, etc. Where would you draw the line of inclusion?
-->
@DavidAZ
how do you account for the fact that every gay child born came from straight parents?Good question. Because they choose to be gay.
Then there is no need for gay people to go out and groom, thier "lineage" will continue as it has for all of recorded human history.
Your argument refutes itself.
what if I said I was born to dislike gay people? Would you tell me I was a bigot then?
You can say that all you want, you are still definitionally a bigot.
It would be a silly argument to make however, we know that hatred towards certain groups is learned, no one is born with that. Certain conditions causing psychotic type beliefs and behavior can be genetic, that's not one of them.
Sexual attraction meanwhile is preceded by arousal, which is not a choice. If it were them pornhub would be obsolete.
Oxford dictionary of perversion: the alteration of something from its original course, meaning, or state to a distortion or corruption of what was first intended.It is okay for a man(male) to be attracted to a woman(female). That's how it started from any creation or evolution background.
The creation standpoint is irrelevant. If your position is ultimately based on the bible then we can end this conversation and instead turn the question to why you consider the bible a credible source of information.
Evolution on the other hand, has no intention nor opinion on this subject. Gay human beings have been around as long as documented human history and undoubtedly longer. You can also find gay activities taking place all throughout the animal kingdom. Such behavior tends to not be the norm because species which primarily engage in such activity are far less likely to survive. That's just a fact of the universe, not a violation of some intended purpose.
You can if you wish, go down the survival path and argue that homosexuality is a threat to human survival, but that path is again, self defeating. It may have been valid centuries ago as we battled the elements of this world before modern technology, but at this point the expansion of our species is depleting the planets non-renewable resources and outpacing it's renewable ones. That's not sustainable so it could very easily be argued that more homosexuals at this point will actually be necessary for the survival of our species.
It is corrupt and it will soon reach to all areas of sexual perversion. Incest, bestiality, pedophilia, etc.
This is just slippery slope paranoia.
There is absolutely no connection between being attracted to the opposite sex and being attracted to family members, children, or animals. You believe this because you have been conditioned by society to think gayness is wrong and a perversion, and have therefore grouped every other form of sexuality you consider wrong and a perversion into the same camp.
You like women but you don't like little girls, and nothing about that seems strange to you. Yet another woman also likes women just like you do. Why would she be any more interested in little girls than you? There is no reason. The same goes for men liking men, just as your wife likes men. The same goes for you liking women but not female dogs. We can do this all day.
You see no issue drawing these lines with people who are like you but when it comes to people who are not like you you throw all of it out the window and presume the worst. And because of that presumption you and everyone else like you unjustifiably makes, these people end up living their lives in the shadows or endure a daily onslaught of hatred leading many of them to commit suicide.
That's what bigotry is. That's the very reason it carries such a negative connotation. You are the walking embodiment of everything wrong with our society.
Where would you draw the line of inclusion?
At consent.
Children cannot consent to sex. Your dog cannot consent to sex. Your kitchen table cannot consent to sex. I draw the line with anything other than two consenting adults. Well, you can go on and fuck your kitchen table if that's your thing I guess, I won't judge.
-->
@Double_R
Such behavior tends to not be the norm because species which primarily engage in such activity are far less likely to survive.
This is true, and dovetails nicely with the point:
It may have been valid centuries ago as we battled the elements of this world before modern technology,
I would bet that you'd find a correlation between species that engage in sexual behavior for reasons OTHER than reproduction (pleasure of course, but certain primate species also do so as a form of 'currency') and homosexual activity. I'm curious if that's ever been studied, I bet it has.
-->
@Double_R
You are the walking embodiment of everything wrong with our society.
I'll wear that one as a badge.
You are far more learned than I am and I cannot pursue this subject further than what I have already said. I will only say to sit and wait for the end of this agenda and let's see what it envelopes. There are other things than intellect and emotion that runs our lives. Some call it intuition. Just my hunch here, but it's going downhill.