Do you think that LGBT will accept pedophiles?

Author: Best.Korea

Posts

Total: 26
Topic's author
#1
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,640
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
LGBT said at the start:

"It is about consensual adults"

Which changed to 

"We should indoctrinate kids about LGBT"

Which changed to

"You are an abuser if you dont let us indoctrinate your kid into LGBT ideology"

Which changed to

"Kids can get hormone injections which could castrate them"

Which changed to

"Kids can have sex change surgery and castrate themselves if they want"

In Europe, a 12 year old had a sex change surgery.

So at this point, its obvious that its not about consensual adults anymore.

In short, LGBT lied. They said "its about adults". You believed them.

These days, LGBT is saying "We will never accept pedophiles".

Will you believe LGBT?

You believed them before. It turned out they were lying. Will you believe them again?
#2
TWS1405_2
TWS1405_2's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 2,186
3
3
7
TWS1405_2's avatar
TWS1405_2
3
3
7
Yup. They most certainly will.
Next is beastality then necrophilia. 
The slippery slope is slippery but disgustingly and offensively TRUE!!!
Started with SCOTUS legislating from the bench granting gay marriage as a constitutional right when it is not. 
#3
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
The ones with the attraction to minors that resist acting on it, yes.

Those that act on it and are non-rehabilitated as in likely to reoffend, no.
#4
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,169
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@TWS1405_2
Yup. They most certainly will.
Next is beastality then necrophilia. 
This world needs to be nuked if pedophilia comes before bestiality or necrophilia.

#5
TWS1405_2
TWS1405_2's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 2,186
3
3
7
TWS1405_2's avatar
TWS1405_2
3
3
7
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Agreed. 
#6
ponikshiy
ponikshiy's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 604
3
3
6
ponikshiy's avatar
ponikshiy
3
3
6
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
This world needs to be nuked if pedophilia comes before bestiality or necrophilia.
Like the famous saying  in your country 

Leave my dog's dick out of your motherfucking mouth

https://youtu.be/81BSkMNI1HU
#7
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,071
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Best.Korea
Q is already a part of the vocabulary.

Though I think that P relative to social ideological overthink is a fairly recent concept anyway.

It's a pity there was nothing about it in the ten commandments.

Moses probably had other things on his mind.
Topic's author
#8
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,640
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
This world needs to be nuked if pedophilia comes before bestiality or necrophilia.
Eh, bestiality?

Necrophilia?

I guess they will probably add those to the LGBT too. I dont see why they wouldnt.
Topic's author
#9
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,640
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@RationalMadman
The ones with the attraction to minors that resist acting on it, yes.
Well, acting on it has many meanings.

It can mean:

1) person doing something to a child

2) Person watching child porn

3) Person watching fake child porn

4) Person watching non-sexual images  of children

I am pretty sure there is more to it.

Like, in Japan, they have legal child porn. They just call it lolicon.

I wonder where the line is drawn.
#10
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Best.Korea
1 and 2 are strong lines drawn. 3 is very iffy, it depends if it decreases or increases their urge to act on it. The world has been surely too closeminded to that for any large sample sizes to have reliable data on if watching it increases odds of acting on it vs pedos who don't watch.

4 is completely legal but if one is going around TAKING images of children against their will and the parent's will as a creepy stranger just to ogle them later, that's messed up.
Topic's author
#11
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,640
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@RationalMadman
4 is completely legal but if one is going around TAKING images of children against their will and the parent's will as a creepy stranger just to ogle them later, that's messed up.
Parents these days willingly post their kids images and videos on social media.


1 and 2 are strong lines drawn.
Well, yes. Although I have seen people arguing for 2 to be legal more than I have seen people arguing for 1 to be legal.


3 is very iffy, it depends if it decreases or increases their urge to act on it.
Sexual desires exist irrelevant if you watch porn or not. Its just that porn satisfies those desires, where lack of porn leaves them unsatisfied. Now, fake child porn is already legal in many countries. Lolicon is so widely spread that you can even find it on YouTube when searching for music.


The world has been surely too closeminded to that for any large sample sizes to have reliable data on if watching it increases odds of acting on it vs pedos who don't watch.
I would say that not having porn does not prevent a pedophile from offending. Its an absurd premise. Sexual desires dont disappear just because person has no porn lmao
#12
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 1,999
3
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
3
7
6
-->
@RationalMadman
LGBT is about acceptance of sexualities, not just of people. If they accept any group, it will be as equals; they won't start advocating for conversion therapy.

That said, by the time pedophilia advocates become more widespread (if they do), the LGBT movement will likely be called something else. Advocacy groups don't maintain the same brand forever, and I already see a number of subgroups forming.
#13
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Best.Korea
You are for banning porn but also for Loli porn?

Or are you playing devil's advocate?
Topic's author
#14
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,640
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@RationalMadman
I am just exploring the topic to see where it goes.

But yes, if regular porn is going to be legal, then it makes no sense to ban loli porn.

Even in regular porn, some adult actresses look rather young.

Loli porn is just an animation. It involves no real people.
#15
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Best.Korea
And you told me this:

-->
@<<<RationalMadman>>>
Porn is a fantastic thing for single people who aren't getting laid to use to aid their orgasms
Science disagrees. In fact, porn addicts end up with less freedom, less happiness, less will to live, depression... and a bunch of sexual perversions that they learned about thanks to porn.

I am breaking the site rule of cross-thread contamination but the thing is how can you say that less than a week ago and now say what you just said:

Sexual desires exist irrelevant if you watch porn or not. Its just that porn satisfies those desires, where lack of porn leaves them unsatisfied. Now, fake child porn is already legal in many countries. Lolicon is so widely spread that you can even find it on YouTube when searching for music.

Topic's author
#16
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,640
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@RationalMadman
I have multiple opinions that sometimes contradict each other.

In this case,

I am against loli if regular porn is banned.

I am for loli if regular porn is allowed.

Given that regular porn already has many perversions, I dont see how adding loli porn into the equation makes any difference.
#17
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,169
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@Best.Korea
[RationalMadman] I am breaking the site rule of cross-thread contamination but the thing is how can you say that less than a week ago and now say what you just said:
If there is a rule against pointing out contradictions between two threads I quit.


[Best.Korea] I have multiple opinions that sometimes contradict each other.
Translation: I'm wrong about something.
Topic's author
#18
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,640
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Translation: I'm wrong about something.
The point of a debate for me is to find out where I am wrong.
#19
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
People cross contaminate so much. Lancelot has free reign to bully me across the whole site with cross contamination, so I know it can easily be broken.
#20
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,169
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@Best.Korea
Translation: I'm wrong about something.
The point of a debate for me is to find out where I am wrong.
Yes... that's true; but it's... odd to say both are your opinions. You should just call them propositions if you already know one is false.

#21
Athias
Athias's avatar
Debates: 20
Posts: 3,192
3
3
9
Athias's avatar
Athias
3
3
9
Do you think that LGBT will accept pedophiles?
They most certainly will. The LBGTIQA+ movement is sponsored by pansexual Luciferians, who already practice pedophilia/pederasty behind closed doors. They've already involved children at very least in the optics of "sexual progressivism."
#22
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,603
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Athias

Rich Ferraro, the chief communications officer at GLAAD, wrote in an email to USA TODAY that "LGBTP" is not an acronym used or supported by the community.
“No LGBTQ organization has condoned pedophilia or advocated for a ‘P’ to be added to the acronym in support of pedophiles,” Ferraro wrote. “It pains me to have to clarify that no, the LGBTQ community does not embrace pedophilia, and LGBTP is not an acronym used or supported by the LGBTQ community.”
#23
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,169
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@FLRW
Yea but what else is a pansexual luciferian practicing pedastry behind closed doors going to say?
#24
Athias
Athias's avatar
Debates: 20
Posts: 3,192
3
3
9
Athias's avatar
Athias
3
3
9
Rich Ferraro, the chief communications officer at GLAAD, wrote in an email to USA TODAY that "LGBTP" is not an acronym used or supported by the community.
“No LGBTQ organization has condoned pedophilia or advocated for a ‘P’ to be added to the acronym in support of pedophiles,” Ferraro wrote. “It pains me to have to clarify that no, the LGBTQ community does not embrace pedophilia, and LGBTP is not an acronym used or supported by the LGBTQ community.”
I'm not suggesting that homosexual and transgendered people by virtue will attempt to promote pedophilia. I'm suggesting that the sociopolitical movement known as "LBGTIQA" meant for public consumption, which is lead by Luciferian sponsors, will attempt to ingratiate the populace with pedophilia at some point eventually. Very much like how "Black Lives Matter," also sponsored by Lucifierians, attempted to ingratiate the so-called "Black" populace with Lesbianism and Transgenderism (all you need to do is look at their mission statement.) That's not akin to stating "black people are trying to make their women gay, and their men dickless." 
#25
Athias
Athias's avatar
Debates: 20
Posts: 3,192
3
3
9
Athias's avatar
Athias
3
3
9
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Yea but what else is a pansexual luciferian practicing pedastry behind closed doors going to say?
That homosexual people are "born" gay? I've seen children at gay pride parades, so these pansexual luciferian pederasts who sponsor these psyops are not covering their tracks as well as they think. Case in point: NAMBLA in the nineties and early 2000's.
#26
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,071
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
LBGT etc.

Should there be an M category.

Or rather, a W category.