The Nefarious Plans of W.H.O. backed by the U.N. and UNESCO - children are in danger!

"In March, UNAIDS and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), two agencies within the United Nations, along with the International Committee of Jurists (ICJ) published a group of "new legal principles" that would advance "decriminalization efforts" globally, and principal 16 stated "sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual."

"“With respect to the enforcement of criminal law, any prescribed minimum age of consent to sex must be applied in a non-discriminatory manner. Enforcement may not be linked to the sex/gender of participants or age of consent to marriage,” the United Nations says.""

That’s ignorance on your part.

Thoughts?

• Quite obvious lies told to appeal to the weakest of minds.
  
• Let's apply some basic skepticism regarding the subject: if the United Nations were actually suggesting that nations decriminalize pedophilia does any skeptical thinker really suppose that only TWS and a handful of sites famous for spreading fake news and disinformation would be the first to discover such initiatives in a report published on Mar 8th documenting principles voted and agreed to by the Trump adminstration in 2018?  
  
• The skeptical thinker must wonder:
  
• Wouldn't the  BBC or Fox media or Le Monde be interested in reporting this scandalous, five year old claim?  Apparently not.  TWS supposes he has scooped all the world's great journalist by merely trolling YouTube  and the creepiest sites on the dark web for the real  and irrefutable truths of the United Nations.  Why, for example, did not the Republican govt. in power and control of the UN at the time of these agreements not object?  Why, indeed, did Donald Trump's adminstration agree to such a declaration if the were even a single iota of truth to this mockworthy claim?
  
• Why did TWS and his sources wait for months after the final report, 5 years after the actual agreement to report this agreement?
  
• Here is the actual text of PRINCIPLE 16:
  
• CONSENSUAL SEXUAL CONDUCTConsensual sexual conduct, irrespective of the type of sexual activity, the sex/gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression of the peopleinvolved or their marital status, may not be criminalized in any circumstances.Consensual same-sex, as well as consensual different-sex sexual relations, orconsensual sexual relations with or between trans, non-binary and other genderdiverse people, or outside marriage – whether pre-marital or extramarital – may,therefore, never be criminalized.With respect to the enforcement of criminal law, any prescribed minimum age ofconsent to sex must be applied in a non-discriminatory manner. Enforcement maynot be linked to the sex/gender of participants or age of consent to marriage.Moreover, sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribedminimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law. In thiscontext, the enforcement of criminal law should reflect the rights and capacity ofpersons under 18 years of age to make decisions about engaging in consensualsexual conduct and their right to be heard in matters concerning them. Pursuant totheir evolving capacities and progressive autonomy, persons under 18 years of ageshould participate in decisions affecting them, with due regard to their age, maturityand best interests, and with specific attention to non-discrimination guarantees.
  
• Notice that no mention of pre-pubescent children or pedophilia is made.
  
• The report states a simple truth and then makes a very reasonable recommendation:
  
• Many people engage in consensual sex before the local age of consent. (Portugal's age of consent, for example, is 21)
  
• When enforcing age of consent laws, even people under the age of consent should be given a voice in any legal decsion "with due regard to their age, maturity, and best interest.
  
• In the US, for example, 55% of teenagers have engaged in sex before the age of 18.  While it would be easy to lock up the majority of teenagers for violation of the law, the UN recommends consideration of the actual capacity of the teenage to make sexual decision and defer to the teenager's best interests when enforcing such laws.
  
• FactCheck.org:  Posts Misrepresent U.N. Panel’s Guidance on Consensual Sex Between Adolescents
  
• APNews: UN report did not call for decriminalizing sex between adults and minors
  
• USA Today: Fact check: Post misinterprets UN report on sex consent
  
• Reuters: Fact Check-UN is not calling for decriminalization of sex with children
  
• Politifact: Fact Check-UN is not calling for decriminalization of sex with children
  
• Mediabias/Factcheck:  Overall, we rate The Hagmann Report as extreme right-biased and Questionable based on the promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories, the use of poor sources, and false information.
  
• Mediabias/Factcheck: Overall, we rate Human Events Right Biased based on story selection that favors the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to failed fact checks and writers who have failed numerous fact checks during their careers.'
  
• The FDA had to shut down Dr. Rima Laibow's business claiming to have cured COVID using "nanosilver."
  
• Laibow also claims to be able to speak to the dead, that she is able to make herself invisible psychically and that no planes struck the WTC on 9/11.
  

That's what they said about gay marriage.

International Water Resources Association?

Homosexuality was becoming more and more tolerated before it was accepted.

When gay marriage was legalized, plenty of people supported gay marriages. 

All across the West, adolescent girls are suddenly identifying as ‘trans’ with friends, clamoring for hormones and surgeries. Teen girls who are struggling with anxiety and depression, but who had no childhood history of gender dysphoria at all.

Geez, if I had a nickle for every dum-dum who thinks that "Ben Shapiro told me I must think so" is some kind of valid argument.

Get over it.