Lol lol lol
What happened to all the Deep State operatives that the Durham report would send to jail? Lol
Posts
Total:
25
“Durham has released his report, and not only is it a dud, but in many ways it’s also the direct opposite of the investigation by the other special counsel in this case, Robert S. Mueller III”
Damn Fanchick, Oro callin you out son.
Lol even Jake Tapper thought the Durham Report was catastrophic for Dems. It’s what we’ve known this entire time. There was not basis to open the Trump-Russia investigation
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Well, the Trump Organization planned to give a $50 million penthouse in the planned Trump Tower Moscow to President Vladimir Putin while the company was in negotiations in 2016 to build the development.
-->
@FLRW
Did you hear Putin blew up 500 million dollars worth of USA ammunition this week? We got such a bargain with Biden, losing billions to Russia.
-->
@Greyparrot
So, you are saying you are anti-Ukraine like Trump?
-->
@FLRW
Oh hell no. I am all for Ukraine winning our money so the Big Guy can get his 10 percent.
-->
@FLRW
a $50 million penthouse...
Why lose millions when we could lose.....Billions???
-->
@ILikePie5
Lol even Jake Tapper thought the Durham Report was catastrophic for Dems. It’s what we’ve known this entire time. There was not basis to open the Trump-Russia investigation
That’s nonsense and the opposite of what the Inspector General’s report said.
Oh hell no. I am all for Ukraine winning our money so the Big Guy can get his 10 percent.
What a moron.
Why lose millions when we could lose.....Billions???
SubTeach got his certificate of substitute teaching from YouTube
This is why the left cannot meme
-->
@ILikePie5
Lol even Jake Tapper thought the Durham Report was catastrophic for Dems. It’s what we’ve known this entire time. There was not basis to open the Trump-Russia investigation
Setting aside what the report actually unveiled, why is a report on the activity of the FBI catastrophic for the democrats? Since when in MAGA world did “the FBI” = “the Democratic Party”?
-->
@Double_R
Setting aside what the report actually unveiled, why is a report on the activity of the FBI catastrophic for the democrats? Since when in MAGA world did “the FBI” = “the Democratic Party”?
Since the time they blatantly ignored the rules to because they supported Hillary Clinton and the Democrats
-->
@ILikePie5
You mean the time that the FBI sealed Trump’s election victory by telling the entire country that Clinton was under federal investigation while concealing that Trump was also under federal investigation?
-->
@Double_R
You mean the time that the FBI sealed Trump’s election victory by telling the entire country that Clinton was under federal investigation while concealing that Trump was also under federal investigation?
You mean how Comey let Hillary walk after she destroyed her blackberrys with hammers and used bleachbit? Or the time they started the Russia investigation?
-->
@ILikePie5
Trump's own DOJ investigated the FBI's handling of the Clinton email scandal and concluded that Comey's decision not to prosecute was consistent with precedent and not effected by bias.
What was not consistent with precedent was for the FBI to make news just days before the election telling the country they were reopening an investigation into Clinton despite having no evidence that anything new or damning would be uncovered (to which there wasn't). And once again, all of this while concealing from the American people that Trump was under investigation for far, far more consequential actions.
But yet here we are. Somehow you managed to turn a situation where the FBI's misjudgements objectively hurt Clinton and thereby helped Trump get elected into an example of how the FBI is in the pocket of the democratic party. The disregard for reality and political hackery is quite impressive
-->
@ILikePie5
Since the time they blatantly ignored the rules to because they supported Hillary Clinton and the Democrats
How long has the FBI been a tool of the left? Since Trump? What a coincidence
-->
@Double_R
But yet here we are. Somehow you managed to turn a situation where the FBI's misjudgements objectively hurt Clinton and thereby helped Trump get elected into an example of how the FBI is in the pocket of the democratic party. The disregard for reality and political hackery is quite impressive
FBI exonerating Hillary Clinton objectively hurt Donald Trump. The point here is that the Trump-Russia investigation was started off of nothing — something we’ve been saying for years now. This fact. You can argue Hillary lost because of Comey. I’d argue she lost because she didn’t campaign in WI, MI, and PA. She was out of touch with voters.
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
How long has the FBI been a tool of the left? Since Trump? What a coincidence
You’re right; probably since the days of J. Edgar Hoover when he went after MLK. After all the Democratic Party was controlled by racist Lyndon B. Johnson
-->
@ILikePie5
Lol even Jake Tapper thought the Durham Report was catastrophic for Dems.
I think Jake Tapper said the report was catastrophic for the FBI. You know he cannot say anything contractually about elected officials in a certain party.
-->
@ILikePie5
FBI exonerating Hillary Clinton objectively hurt Donald Trump. The point here is that the Trump-Russia investigation was started off of nothing — something we’ve been saying for years now. This fact. You can argue Hillary lost because of Comey. I’d argue she lost because she didn’t campaign in WI, MI, and PA. She was out of touch with voters.
I didn't argue she lost because of Comey, I argued that the decision to tell Congress days before the election that he was reopening the investigation into Clinton objectively hurt the Clinton campaign, because it did. Your insinuation that it somehow helped her is ridiculous. You may not remember this, but there was a time before Trump where an FBI investigation into a politician hurt their poll numbers, not helped it.
The polling data shows what common sense already concludes, that Clinton's poll numbers sank right after Comey's letter to Congress. For the last 10 or so days of the election this was pretty much what everyone was talking about. You don't just erase the impact of that by coming out at the end and saying "nevermind", and to the extent she gained anything after that it was only a portion of what she lost because of it.
Tempting as it may be to get into a whole thing about the Russia investigation and why that was absolutely not based in nothing, that's irrelevant here. You are using 2016 as a example show that the FBI is somehow in the pocket of the democratic party. Even if the Trump investigation was entirely done out of bias against him, that still does more to prove my point than yours because they did not tell anyone about it till after the election.
What is the point of starting an investigation for political reasons if you're not going to use it for politics? Meanwhile there was absolutely no rule or precedent that the FBI tell Congress about the reopening of that investigation and they did anyway. That's not an organization trying to help Trump win, the logic pretzel one must contort themselves within to believe that is insane.
-->
@Double_R
I didn't argue she lost because of Comey, I argued that the decision to tell Congress days before the election that he was reopening the investigation into Clinton objectively hurt the Clinton campaign, because it did. Your insinuation that it somehow helped her is ridiculous. You may not remember this, but there was a time before Trump where an FBI investigation into a politician hurt their poll numbers, not helped it.
Sure. No one denies that it hurt Clinton. Maybe she shouldn’t have done what she did using BleachBit to wipe stuff and breaking BlackBerrys with hammers. The fact of the matter is that she’s responsible for her own actions. She used a private server for classified information. Everyone knows that’s wrong.
Let’s look at Trump though: there was no legal basis to start an investigation. Period.
The polling data shows what common sense already concludes, that Clinton's poll numbers sank right after Comey's letter to Congress. For the last 10 or so days of the election this was pretty much what everyone was talking about. You don't just erase the impact of that by coming out at the end and saying "nevermind", and to the extent she gained anything after that it was only a portion of what she lost because of it.
Hillary lost by losing PA, MI, and WI where she barely campaigned. Her email issue was a known entity.
Tempting as it may be to get into a whole thing about the Russia investigation and why that was absolutely not based in nothing, that's irrelevant here. You are using 2016 as a example show that the FBI is somehow in the pocket of the democratic party. Even if the Trump investigation was entirely done out of bias against him, that still does more to prove my point than yours because they did not tell anyone about it till after the election.
They opened the investigation like 4 months before the election. Trump openly criticized James Comey during 2016. Hell, he was the one that fired him. To say that one instance of the FBI helping Trump regardless of magnitude of impact digresses from the entire point that 95% of the time the FBI has helped Democrats. Peter Strozk and Lisa Page are Democrats. Andy McCabe is a Democrat. Comey is a Bush Republican which is a Democrat today.
What is the point of starting an investigation for political reasons if you're not going to use it for politics? Meanwhile there was absolutely no rule or precedent that the FBI tell Congress about the reopening of that investigation and they did anyway.
That makes no sense. If there’s no precedent, then they can do as they please, especially if they think it is important (it clearly is).
That's not an organization trying to help Trump win, the logic pretzel one must contort themselves within to believe that is insane.
Again, one time “helping” Trump doesn’t digress from the 99 other times it has helped Democrats. Trump-Russia killed 2018.
-->
@ILikePie5
To say that one instance of the FBI helping Trump regardless of magnitude of impact digresses from the entire point that 95% of the time the FBI has helped Democrats.
The fact that the FBI's actions have largely helped democrats is not a reflection of the FBI, it's a reflection of the republican party and it's base. You need to learn to look inward.
You talk about Trump-Russia as if it's the FBI's fault half the country or more suspects Trump of being some kind of witting or unwitteng agent of the Kremlin. That's nonsense. First of all, the special council was appointed under a Trump DOJ lead by a Trump apologist and opened by a hand picked Trump apointee. The fact that it occurred at all has nothing to do with the FBI.
Second, the reason it was necessary as well as the reason it picked up so much steam politically is because of the Trump campaign's very public and yet inexplicable associations with Russians and allignment with Russia's goals that were entirely unique in American politics.
And then there's Trump himself, who constantly fawns over Putin calling him a great strong leader, cowers to him on the world stage as he takes Putin's side over that of US intelligence, weakens the US's relationship with all of its allies that Russia wants to break up especially by threatening to pull the US out of NATO, and let's not forget the time Trump arranged a secret meeting with Putin with no American in the room except a translator whose notes Trump confiscated and destroyed and to which Trump has never revealed what was said.
To not be suspicious at the very least of Trump's relationship to Putin and Russia is beyond naivety, that's intentional.
But then the FBI investigates Trump/Russia and people like yourself pretend it's indicative of some kind of ill intent by an organization obviously in the pocket of democrats. That's just ridiculous.