Mother doesnt like her child = Child damaged

I dont consider psychology as a science. The psychology related studies usually have high failure rate.

Any ideology that says "You are bad because this happened in your childhood" is not only very stupid, but one could even say pointless.

Prayer is more likely than psychology to cure the depression.

So naturally, to compensate for its high failure rate, psychology turns to studies in hope that it discovers something that was previously hidden.

There are only two most logical conclusions that can come from this study's conclusion:

1) Make antipathy illegal, so it stops harming children

2) Force parents to pay compensations for harming their children.

Here, you will notice something. The psychologists disagree with conclusions 1 and 2, but agree with the study's conclusion.

This is equal to saying "We agree that this problem exists, but we dont want to do anything real to solve it".

What psychologists really want - and what the point of these studies is - is to get more people to visit psychologists so that psychologists can earn more money.

Unlike the religion, the psychology is not a non-profit organization.

Unlike the prayer and the talk with God, the talk with psychologist is not free.

I dont (sic) consider psychology as a science.

The psychology related studies usually have high failure rate.

Any ideology that says "You are bad because this happened in your childhood" is not only very stupid, but one could even say pointless.

Therefore, it is of no surprise that psychology didnt (sic) result in decrease of mental illnesses.

In fact, the success rate of psychology in dealing with mental illnesses is non-existent.

Prayer is more likely than psychology to cure the depression.

So naturally, to compensate for its high failure rate, psychology turns to studies in hope that it discovers something that was previously hidden.

Therefore, the point of studies is not to solve the problem, as proven by response to conclusions 1 and 2. The point of studies is to make profit from that problem.

This was already disproven by:

"The psychologists disagree with conclusions 1 and 2, but agree with the study's conclusion.".

You cannot take a child away unless dictated by the law.

She just so happens to work for a non-profit.

Then you go to refute yourself by saying:

It's not free because psychologists, like the rest of us, have to eat.

I dont consider psychology as a science. The psychology related studies usually have high failure rate. Any ideology that says "You are bad because this happened in your childhood" is not only very stupid, but one could even say pointless. Therefore, it is of no surprise that psychology didnt result in decrease of mental illnesses. In fact, the success rate of psychology in dealing with mental illnesses is non-existent. Prayer is more likely than psychology to cure the depression.

What psychologists really want - and what the point of these studies is - is to get more people to visit psychologists so that psychologists can earn more money.

Don't conclusions 1 and 2 propose new laws? If you can propose new laws, why can't I?

Even so, non-profits still need money so that the employees can eat

Non-profit does not mean free. Non-profit means that the goal is to help people, rather than to make money.

Psychology doesn’t use adjectives like ‘bad’ because that’s a subjective term. If a person is demonstrating behavior that makes them a risk to those around them or themselves, psychology will describe those actions as ‘harmful.’

Psychologists are required to approach the subject of mental disorders with empathy and understanding, not scrutiny and criticism. Harsh judgments are seen as bad conduct in the professional field.

While there are con artists in every industry, psychology is an intense field that is hard to make a living at. Con artists looking to make a quick buck are more likely to turn to easier options because psychology is such a competitive industry with a high turnover rate and a low chance of sufficient pay. There’s also a code of ethics that demands the best behavior because one misstep could result in a license being revoked.

Don't conclusions 1 and 2 propose new laws? If you can propose new laws, why can't I?

The argument was that psychologists oppose to making those laws, without which you cannot realize what you suggested.

Even so, non-profits still need money so that the employees can eat

If you want to eat, get an actual job.

Non-profit does not mean free. Non-profit means that the goal is to help people, rather than to make money.

It was already pointed out that psychology doesnt help people. So if it is not free and doesnt help, its a waste.

I don't think that they would be quite as opposed to other suggestions.  (Like what I proposed!...

So yes, it does help people. So yes, it's an actual job.

I don't think that they would be quite as opposed to other suggestions.  (Like what I proposed!...

"The argument was that psychologists oppose to making those laws, without which you cannot realize what you suggested."

So yes, it does help people. So yes, it's an actual job.

"Therefore, it is of no surprise that psychology didnt result in decrease of mental illnesses."

One of us has a source, one of us doesn't...

One of us googled "Are mental illnesses on the rise in USA". One of us didnt.

One of compared suicide rates of countries where psychology tried to replace religion, to suicide rates of countries where psychology is almost non-existent. One of us didnt.

I was forced into psychological treatment and forced to use psychiatric drugs.

It greatly diminished my IQ, but my IQ is still greatly above that of other humans. When I make arguments, people usually dont understand what I am saying. I guess too complicated for them.

Correlation is not causation

That might have something to do with the fact that highly religious countries often scare people into not committing suicide.

Finland is considered the happiest country in the world, and it isn't particularly religious.

It sounds like you went to a psychiatrist and not a psychologist.

If you want help in the form of actually talking with someone, having them listen to you, and have them make suggestions which don't involve drugs, go to a psychologist.

Also, under what circumstances were you actually forced to take drugs?

What drug was this that diminished your IQ so much?

Repeated correlation is causation. You are supposed to know that the only way to establish causation is through correlation. I dont see how can you possibly not know this.

Thanks for admitting that religion prevents suicide. So now we are getting somewhere.

No. The high suicide rate in Finland disagrees, obviously. Finland is very bad at preventing suicides. Just when I thought that I was getting somewhere with you, you went back and said this nonsense.

No. I went to both psychologist and psychiatrist by force. I dont see how could you possibly not understand that one person can go to both psychologist and psychiatrist. This is what I am talking about. People cannot comprehend what is being said to them. I literally have to break things down to you and feed you the simplest information possible, and you still fail to understand.

No. When I want help by talking and get suggestions, I talk to God. God is the creator of worlds. Psychologist is a deluded puppet of its government. Didnt we already established that religion is much better at preventing suicides?

It happened when I was in prison.

What? No it isn't! Repeated correlation is correlation. Causation can only be established using a controlled experiment.

What I have to back up that Finland is a happy country

What you don't have to back up a high suicide rate in Finland

Also, did you just completely ignore the part where I pointed out that high suicide rate and high rate of mental illness aren't necessarily the same thing

Also, why do you feel the need to whine about how you're so much smarter then everyone else?

especially when you don't consistently use an apostrophe in the words "don't" and "didn't."

Seriously though, how does that even make sense? Many psychology clinics aren't government run.

Also, as previously stated, some people don't believe in God.

Please don't let that effect your view of psychologists generally.

I am willing to bet that if psychology no longer existed starting now, suicide rates would further drastically increase.

 Psychologists won't just listen. Once you're done talking, they will ask you some questions, and then give you some advice. They will help you to self-reflect, keep calm, etc

people who don't believe in God don't feel listened to

No. Ranting into psychologist does not decrease suicide rates. We see that religious countries that dont have psychology at all actually have surprisingly low suicide rates. It is like psychology is unnecessary waste of money.

So more ranting on both sides. Usually, asking private questions is considered rude, as well as asking stupid questions. But psychologists dont seem to have a problem with being rude.

More reason for  them to believe in God. Or they can pay to rant with psychologist.

 some people see God as only as real as unicorns, so they're not going to be able to get themselves to believe in Him on command.

Then they can pay a psychologist.