That does not answer his question without being transphobic to any who have not done a surgery.
If a male has an accident and loses his penis he would be a woman under your definition, an underage girl would also be a woman under your definition.
The biggest problem of that definition is then it means we need to see one's genitalia to determine if they are a woman, not take their word for it.
Anyways, this definition, while interesting, wouldn't properly define it, because biological women can surgically get a penis, and it works the same.So biological woman would have penises too.
Whether you agree or disagree, let me know. I don’t block. Free speech!
But it’s not like there are media recorded instances of guys losing their dicks without a surgery, so you wouldn’t need a definition. I can modify the definition of woman to be, “Any adult with no dick.”
To me a woman is the one who has xy chromosome and a man xx chromosome. Genes always tell the truth.
Biological women that get dicks would be classified as men because they would have transitioned.
Biological women that get dicks would be classified as men because they would have transitioned.
You might want to check your sources there. XX is genetically female, XY is genetically male
So, in order to identify as transgender, you have to get a surgery done?What about the people who identify as transgender, but don't have the surgery?
And also, you would have to exclude any man who might have had an accident with his penis, like it gets cut off.
There is not a single male out there that had their penis cut off against their will.
They didn’t transition, so they are not transgender.
There is not a single male out there that had their penis cut off against their will. And if this is the case, they are going to get a surgery to recover their penis. Once they retransition, they are men again.
Surgery for women who want a penis. Those penises won't work the same as a biological mans would.Surgery for men who want a vagina. You still have to work at it every week to keep the wound/vagina open.
If a guy gets his penis cut off, then for that small amount of time that he doesn't have a penis, (even if he doesn't identify as one) he is a woman?
You couldn’t reproduce with the penis, but it’s still a penis so we can classify gender based on genitalia.
I would make that argument. It’s a better argument to make than claiming this person is a man:
What makes a penis though?If something that looks like a penis, can be classified as a penis, then you are going to have to go in nature, and classify a lot of things as penises.
He has the title of a trans woman, which in turn implies that he is not just a normal woman.
He is admitting being a biological man.
But according to you, women have vaginas so they couldn't be a woman either so......what are they.
If a woman wears a strapon or uses a dildo, she is still a woman but she 'has' a dick on her person then, yes?When a woman is fucked is she a man while the dick is inside her?
I’m no biology expert, but my guess would be a cinder piece of cartilage that is surrounded by a cylinder piece of flesh that is near the middle of the body.
But if you had no idea Lux was trans, you would think Lux is a woman.
Lux is a biological man, but society should treat them as a female because I can’t tell Lux apart from a generic cis female.
Isn’t a vagina just a hole? And I heard gender surgeries inverted the dick.
Not necessarily. You can even hear the masculine sound in his voice, and other traits that he has, that shows he has a lot of biological male character traits.
Again, this does not refute what I said. He is a Trans-woman, not a woman.
YOU can hear the voice being masculine. But I can’t. It’s high pitched.
