debate on contridictions via judges and multiple criterion

Author: Melcharaz

Posts

Total: 15
Melcharaz
Melcharaz's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 780
2
5
8
Melcharaz's avatar
Melcharaz
2
5
8
i am looking for contender for a debate on contridiction and How it is needful for change.
i and contender will agree on judge(s) for this debate and the judge(s) will have to comment their method of judging via multiple criterions in comments section once debate starts.

if anyone is intrested please dm me. this debate will mostly be a test, but will operate in good faith.

also, some please post a screenshot and explain multiple criterion options Here. as examples incase any new person wishes to be a judge. Thanks!
Melcharaz
Melcharaz's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 780
2
5
8
Melcharaz's avatar
Melcharaz
2
5
8
update: contender has been chosen. we are now negotiating judges.
Melcharaz
Melcharaz's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 780
2
5
8
Melcharaz's avatar
Melcharaz
2
5
8
we are now looking for 1 volunteer judge for this debate.

PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
What is the debate on specifically?
Melcharaz
Melcharaz's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 780
2
5
8
Melcharaz's avatar
Melcharaz
2
5
8
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
the debate will specifically be on the NEED for contridictions for change.

what changes and how need is defined will be in round 1 opening or comments before opening.

basically we can argue self contridiction, the philosophy of contridiction. the societal rejection of contridiction. etc
Melcharaz
Melcharaz's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 780
2
5
8
Melcharaz's avatar
Melcharaz
2
5
8
update: Our contender is unable to debate at this time. Looking for a new contender and a volunteer judge!
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
If you are desperate add me. Only if nobody else steps up. 
Melcharaz
Melcharaz's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 780
2
5
8
Melcharaz's avatar
Melcharaz
2
5
8
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
as a contender or judge? im in no hurry and can wait a couple days. if you wish to be contender or judge. dm me
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
-->
@Melcharaz
I don't completely comprehend the topic. Maybe because I am tired. I think you are arguing that 

"Consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds" as the famous quote says. Not only would I agree with that, I don't see a good devil's advocate argument to make. Judging is the only thing I could do

Melcharaz
Melcharaz's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 780
2
5
8
Melcharaz's avatar
Melcharaz
2
5
8
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
close enough. i was thinking along the lines of walt whitman.
Do I contradict myself?
Very well then I contradict myself,
(I am large, I contain multitudes.)
I concentrate toward them that are nigh, I wait on the door-slab.

Melcharaz
Melcharaz's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 780
2
5
8
Melcharaz's avatar
Melcharaz
2
5
8
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
once a new contender is come you have 1st spot as judge. we will have minimum of 3 judges total.

thank you for volunteering!
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
No wonder wylted would agree with that topic, hypocrisy is an actual way of life for hum.
Melcharaz
Melcharaz's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 780
2
5
8
Melcharaz's avatar
Melcharaz
2
5
8
-->
@RationalMadman
would you like to be a contender or judge?
Melcharaz
Melcharaz's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 780
2
5
8
Melcharaz's avatar
Melcharaz
2
5
8
it will not be a rated debate. i think ive done less than 5

Melcharaz
Melcharaz's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 780
2
5
8
Melcharaz's avatar
Melcharaz
2
5
8
i have changed my mind, this debate will not go forward.
please disregard this thread.