Polytheist-Witch banned. Are you happy now?

Author: Best.Korea

Posts

Total: 7
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,638
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
A situation that could have been solved with simple apology from Stephen.

Polytheist-Witch didnt harm the site in any way. What she was talking about, was related to what Stephen said to her.

I dont know why do people expect to be able to "Quote Bible passages that command to kill witches", "post insulting jokes about witches being burned" and "to mention Witch's children in a very weird manner" and expect that all of that goes without response.

The Witch's response to all of that was a bit too much, but not really enough to deserve a permanent ban.

The people these days are very sensitive. What the Witch was saying, wasnt even a good insult due to being overused. I doubt that anyone was upset about it to the point where ban is needed.

Some of you are obviously happy that she is gone. In fact, some of you have made threads targeting her specifically just to get her to cross the line and get banned.

If this is how you wish for things on DebateArt to be, so be it. However, you are hardly acheiving anything other than proving that you are incapable to exchange words for words.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
Those people are all sided with Wylted or 'neutral', not one person that voted me has been that way to Witch. 
Sir.Lancelot
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Debates: 182
Posts: 807
4
6
9
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Sir.Lancelot
4
6
9
Apologizing would have been taken as an admission of guilt from Stephen. 
To which I ask, did Stephen's comment mean what she accused him of or was she intentionally taking his statement out of context as part of her trolling? 
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,638
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
Apologizing would have been taken as an admission of guilt from Stephen.
Is not true. He could have just said "I didnt say that, but I am sorry if I caused you to be upset. I will stop making fun of witches. I hope we can solve this." and then actually stop provoking her or stop talking to her if he cant talk without provoking.

But he didnt. What he did was to provoke her even more, knowing where it will lead to.

The point is: "Stephen could have done much better".
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
Best korea what did you do to me regarding autism? I just am so confused at how you are grandstanding...
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,638
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
I am sorry about what I did. I have stopped with insults. If you look at my posts, you wont find any insults anymore.

Plus, I believe I am correct for pointing out what happened in this case. It seems to me that if I point it out, it will make people think about what they are doing next time something like this happens.
Sir.Lancelot
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Debates: 182
Posts: 807
4
6
9
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Sir.Lancelot
4
6
9
-->
@Best.Korea
I am sorry about what I did. I have stopped with insults. If you look at my posts, you wont find any insults anymore.

Plus, I believe I am correct for pointing out what happened in this case. It seems to me that if I point it out, it will make people think about what they are doing next time something like this happens.
You're forgiven.