White Supremacy does not exist in America today.

Author: YouFound_Lxam

Posts

Total: 286
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Again......gender, wealth and race, are very different things. 
It seems you only object to segregation by race, even when that segregation is voluntary and not a result of laws.

I never said black supremacy exists either.
Yes, I do recall you objecting to how some blacks think they are better than you. This was several weeks ago 
TWS1405_2
TWS1405_2's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 2,186
3
3
7
TWS1405_2's avatar
TWS1405_2
3
3
7
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Are you suggesting that self segregation is bad?  I’m sure when you were in the army you only hung out with other racist idiots.

“Are you suggesting…” = strawman fallacy.  

 Way to dodge the facts. Intellectual curses that you so
Clearly are. 
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,071
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Supremacy is a pertinent concept for some people who think that they are superior to some other people.

I'm sure that it comes in all shapes, sizes, and colours.
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
It seems you only object to segregation by race, even when that segregation is voluntary and not a result of laws.
Because there is a reason for segregation when it comes to gender, because there are different gender roles. 
And there is a reason for segregation when it comes to wealth, because some people can afford more than others. 

There is no reason for segregation when it comes to race. 

Yes, I do recall you objecting to how some blacks think they are better than you. This was several weeks ago 
I said some people think they are better than me. Not blacks. 
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,920
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@Barney
Barney 140...Whelp, this topic is clearly bait which no one in the USA would actually believe.
I now suspect the OP is engaging in roleplay, rather than believing what they write.
I agree. In post 145 I make this clear to them also.

Ylxm.....But the vast majority of people in the USA are not racist or white supremacists.

Ylxam, you appear to forget the title of thread.  "White Supremacy Does Not Exist in America Today". Yes it does  and your own words above accept this fact, to whatever degree.

Your  totally in denial and  want to avoid the truth of racism and white supremacy attitudes  that do exist in USA and other countries.

This appears to be a lack of moral and intellectual integrity on your part. No surprise there. Baiting and trolling for logical, common sense, critical thinking people to engage with your ego of denial, and lack of moral and intellectual integrity.  Typical right-wing behavioral  tendencies.

Are you currently a skin-head?  Where you skin-head in past? Dont both to answer, cause few will believe anything you say.


Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,669
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Well, I don't think that way. I look at people based on the content of there character, not there race. I guess I'm just a freak of nature then.
Isn't that special LOL


IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
because there are different gender roles. 
Really? How would “gender roles” necessitate an all girls learning environment? And what are these gender roles you speak of? Are those the ones where the boy takes out the trash and the girl cooks? 

Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,972
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
Are those the ones where the boy takes out the trash and the girl cooks? 
Considering most girls are trash today, guys are better off cooking for themselves. (safer too)
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
Really? How would “gender roles” necessitate an all girls learning environment? And what are these gender roles you speak of? Are those the ones where the boy takes out the trash and the girl cooks?
Simple really. There are boys schools and girls schools, so the boys don't get too horny and impregnate the girls. Or the girls don't make a stupid decision and get impregnated, when they are not ready for that. 

But most schools today are not like that. All I am saying is that segregation between boys and girls serves a purpose. Segregation between race doesn't.
SkepticalOne
SkepticalOne's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 1,720
3
3
7
SkepticalOne's avatar
SkepticalOne
3
3
7
-->
@TWS1405_2
The arrest rates prove my position, your semantics argument falls flat on its face. And even people found “not guilty” does NOT prove they didn’t do it. And some cases get dismissed on technicalities, which certainly does not prove they did not do it. 
Arrests =/= guilt. Arrest rates are meaningless to your point. Yes, not guilty does not equate to innocence, and dismissal does not equate to innocent or guilty. That goes to my point. The simple fact is arrests and being found guilty does not absolutely equate to having committed a crime. You're looking at the world through a pinhole. 

This is a personal subjective opinion. If you have NO law enforcement training let alone worked in the field, or even in the field of criminal justice (e.g., DA’s Office), then your subjective opinion is worth about as much as a bed pan of urine in the 1700s. 
How convenient that the former cop thinks only cops and legal professionals can understand criminal justice. If that were true, then wouldn't it be silly to have laws for common folks? There are individuals who know the criminal justice system inside and out because they've been through it and gained insights from firsthand experience. I've also seen audits of the police - Officers don't always know the law as well as they think they do. So gtfoh with your dubious appeal to your own authority.
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
-->
@Greyparrot
Funny how when women start acting like men they're trash but men are glorious when they act that way. Women can't be in dorms with men cuz men will rape them. And if the men living there don't their buddies that come to visit will.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,972
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
Sorry, but masculine women are only attractive to other women.
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
-->
@Greyparrot
No one cares what your  woman hating ass thinks.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,972
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
Enjoy your cats.
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
-->
@Greyparrot
Don't be jealous I have more pussy than you.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,972
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
lol
TWS1405_2
TWS1405_2's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 2,186
3
3
7
TWS1405_2's avatar
TWS1405_2
3
3
7
-->
@SkepticalOne
The arrest rates prove my position, your semantics argument falls flat on its face. And even people found “not guilty” does NOT prove they didn’t do it. And some cases get dismissed on technicalities, which certainly does not prove they did not do it. 
Arrests =/= guilt.

Thank you Captain OBVIOUS! 🤦🏼‍♂️


Arrest rates are meaningless to your point.

How so? That’s like saying the Uniform Crime Reports is meaningless in its intended purpose. 




Yes, not guilty does not equate to innocence, and dismissal does not equate to innocent or guilty. That goes to my point. The simple fact is arrests and being found guilty does not absolutely equate to having committed a crime. You're looking at the world through a pinhole. 
When police arrest someone it is because they were either caught red handed, or through a diligent investigation they acquired enough evidence to establish PC for the arrest. They do not go around arresting any bloke off the street and call it good for UCR purposes. The arrest statistics serve a purpose, and they discredit your point (as if you even had one) 🙄. 
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,669
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
@Greyparrot
Get a room you two.
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
-->
@Sidewalker
Oh my God that's hysterical!!? 😂😂😂
Public-Choice
Public-Choice's avatar
Debates: 19
Posts: 1,065
3
4
8
Public-Choice's avatar
Public-Choice
3
4
8
-->
@SkepticalOne
@Wylted
@YouFound_Lxam
If I may interject here.

I am in a biracial relationship. Not that this should matter, but it gave me the opportunity to ask my girlfriend's family all the taboo questions that white people are not allowed to ask black people about race in America and what it means to be black, and more.

Now, my girlfriend's mom is a direct descendant of a civil rights reformer. Not MLK or anyone known, but someone who grew up in segregation and actually did things to fight it.

I am saying all this to set the groundwork for what I'm about to say:

Black people commit more crimes for a whole host of reasons. 

I grew up around affluent minorities in a very ethnically diverse area. So I never understood why there was a propensity for black people to commit crimes, since all the black people I knew were not sny more likely to commit a crime than all my white friends.

Wylted is right... Partly. There are socioeconomic factors at play here. But they are the RESULT OF THE PROBLEM. Not the problem itself.

There's four main things that cause black people to go into crime:

1. The media pushes stereotypes of black people being poor, oppressed, and criminals. The music industry also glorifies black people like Tupak and biggie who were gang leaders. If you don't believe me. Go to a news website and look up what they are saying about black people. You will see totally bullshit narratives such as:

- Black people are poor.
- Black people are oppressed.
- Black people commit crimes.
- Black people are uneducated.
- White people do not like black people.
- Black people are forced to become gangsters.

All of this is completely untrue. Oprah isn't poor, oppressed, or a criminal. Neither are virtually all black football players and basketball players. And, right now, most pop music artists making millions are black. In 2008 and 2012 America elected a Black President. The Supreme Court has two black justices. And there is a Congressional Black Caucus.

Kevin Hart is one of the riches comedians. Daymond John is a very wealthy investor and entrepreneur. Morgan Friedman is perhaps the most successful actor of all time. Whoopi Goldberg literally went on an antisemitic rant on live television and wasnt fired. Kanye West is the richest music artist in history.

Clearly black people are not all poor oppressed criminals who cannot escape poverty unless they commit a life of crime.  All these extremely successful black people prove that nartative is a load of bullshit.

But that is the narrative spoonfed through the media (not just the news media. It's also in movies and music and even fucking podcasts now).

The problem is, black people, just like anyone else, blindly believe whatever the media tells them, even if it doesn't make any fucking sense. They see Oprah bitch and moan about being oppressed and think she is oppressed, even though she has her own television network, is a rather savvy investor, and has 20 billion dollars and a bunch of successful brands she started. How the flying fuck is that oppression? 

But the thing is, when people begin to believe they are oppressed, poor, and criminals, they begin to live that way. Even though they can become the Oprahs, Kevin Harts, Morgan Friedmans, Daymond Johns, and Obamas of society.

However, this is only part of the problem.

2. The same racist assholes who owned slaves used their influence to shove black people onto horrible living environments and take away their money and destory their infrastructure clear through to the 1970s.

Anyone else remember Black Wall Street? In Tulsa, Oklahoma? It wasn't a ghetto in the 1920s. It was an up-and-coming center of industry where black people were getting rich. There were a whole host of affluent black people living there, and, if we'd have let it alone, racism probably would have ended about 50 years earlier than it did.

The corporations, at that time run by white supremacists, didn't like this. So they used eminent domain to take land from black people, turning the Greenwood District in Tulsa into the high-crime area it is today.

They did the same thing to Harlem in NYC. 

In the south, white supremacists used their money and influence, along with the white supremacists in government, to shove black people into undeveloped neighborhoods. They also made sure not to build any infrastructure there, provide no public transportation, and not employ any of them so that they stayed poor. This went on clear into the 1970s and 80s.

Moreover, the corporations (that were run by the White Supremacists) would purposely only hire a single token black person, and then just leave the positions open indefinitely for all other minority positions to keep black people from getting jobs. This also happened clear into the 1980s.

Most of the corporate racism didn't end until the 90s. Same with the racist housing and infrastructure barriers. But eminent domain was largely unused as a means of control by the 1970s.

By the 1990s, most of these mechanisms of control were ended. And the corporations got younger people who did not agree with white supremacy on the boards, which allowed major changes to happen.

So this is why many black people (around 33%) live in high-crime environments in households that do not have college degrees or good paying jog or infrastructure.

And there is definitely residue from this. But, over time, if we remove problems 1,3, and 4, these areas will either become hubs of industry or completely barren wastelands where nobody lives.

3. Single-Parent Homes

Black people, up until the 1970s, did not grow up in single parent homes. There was a really strong community and family unit. But the white supremacists started paying black preachers boatloads of money to begin pushing for things that would destroy the family. 

As you all know, growing up in a single-parent household with no father is a very high correlation with criminal activity. This is especially true for boys who have no father to show them how to be a good man. There's no positive role model, so some of these kids join a gang because the gang leader acts like a father figure to them. Or they want to become a gang leader because those are the people making money and getting women and in power where they live.

But, for the overwhelming majority of black kids who do not join a gang, not having a father can lead to psychological issues and problems with aggression.

This isn't to say it is impossible to grow up in a single-parent household and not commit crime, many black people achieve this, but it is just a factor that makes one more likely to commit crime.

4. Removal of Christianity

This one is the most important reason. Until the 1980s, black people were largely committed Christians who had socially conservative values. These values looked down upon crime, divorce, abortions, and more. They also promoted community, father figures, and neighbors helping each other out.

When the White Supremacists began bankrolling black pastors, these black pastors began hyping feminism, divorces, abortion, and government welfare instead of the values that were helping the community better themselves.

So it is the combination of all these things that are causing black people to commit more crimes. And they are all caused by racism from rich white people who make trillions on this sort of oppression in the form of welfare housing, diversity grants, monopolizing the infrastructure in poor black areas, and getting government grants to build mediocre infrastructure for black people. They have a huge financial incentive to keep the black community in the mindset of point one, in the locations of point two, in the marriages of point three, and the anti-Christianity of point four, because it breeds helpless-feeling individuals who think they need a bailout and someone else to take care of them to be "equal."

To solve these problems, we need to stop the systems of control.

In all of these systems, all a person needs to do is become enlightened to it and realize they are not hopeless. That their skin color and environment do not define them. And that staying out of crime will lead to a much higher chance of success in life. And instill an entrepreneurial spirit that empowers black people to realize their potential.

If we did that, then the systems of control would fall apart, and racism in America would end.
Public-Choice
Public-Choice's avatar
Debates: 19
Posts: 1,065
3
4
8
Public-Choice's avatar
Public-Choice
3
4
8
To clarify, the overwhelming majority of black people do not commit crimes. But many do believe and share the stereotypes and follow and encourage the control systems that cause a higher percentage of black people to commit crimes. So that is part of the problem.

My post is in no way stating black people are mostly criminals. I am merely attempting to explain why there is a much higher percentage compared to other "races." It is mainly these factors.

But, at minimum, these factors likely affect 80% of black people in general and prevent these black people from advancing further in their careers or progressing. 

There's loads more I can write that goes into more detail. This was just an overview.
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
-->
@Public-Choice
I agree 100%. 
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
. Removal of Christianity
That's right if you don't worship Jesus you're an evil fuck head.
Public-Choice
Public-Choice's avatar
Debates: 19
Posts: 1,065
3
4
8
Public-Choice's avatar
Public-Choice
3
4
8
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
How did you possibly get that from what I said? I said that the attacking of the Christian culture and strong belief served as the strongest deterrent against crime.

Nowhere does that conclude that non-Christians are all Hitler.
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Simple really. There are boys schools and girls schools, so the boys don't get too horny and impregnate the girls. Or the girls don't make a stupid decision and get impregnated, when they are not ready for that. 
But most schools today are not like that. All I am saying is that segregation between boys and girls serves a purpose. Segregation between race doesn't.
that does not answer the question; what did you mean when you said gender roles require segregation of boys and girls. Unless you are saying that because boys have a role of having a penis and girls have a role of having a vagina we need to keep them apart.

If that’s why you think girls schools ( or boys schools) are operated you would be sadly mistaken. 

Think again why girls might want to go to school in an all girls environment (it’s not about avoiding pregnancy)

Then think why blacks, or any other marginalized group, might want an environment that has been segregated.
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,669
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Well, I don't think that way. I look at people based on the content of there character, not there race. I guess I'm just a freak of nature then.
You have said you believe some blacks ( that you know) believe in black supremacy but you don’t believe White Supremacy exists. Does that seem like a logical belief to you?
He doesn't believe white Supremacy exists because he doesn't like the way it is worded, the kid doesn't believe in white supremacy because he believes in Aryan Supremacy.
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
that does not answer the question; what did you mean when you said gender roles require segregation of boys and girls.
Never said it requires. I just used that as an example. 

Think again why girls might want to go to school in an all girls environment (it’s not about avoiding pregnancy)
What is it about then?
Then think why blacks, or any other marginalized group, might want an environment that has been segregated.
So, when whites want a segregated group to themselves, that's wrong, but when blacks want a segregated group to themselves, that's ok?
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
“Because there is a reason for segregation when it comes to gender, because there are different gender roles.”
This is what you said. So, what is the reason (requirement) for segregation by gender as it relates to “different gender roles”?


IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
So, when whites want a segregated group to themselves, that's wrong, but when blacks want a segregated group to themselves, that's ok?
Like a whites only restaurant or drinking fountain? You remind me of that famous picture showing little kids in KKK hoods and robes. 

You are living proof that white supremacy still exists in this country because white supremacy and ignorance go together like peas and carrots.

YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
This is what you said. So, what is the reason (requirement) for segregation by gender as it relates to “different gender roles”?
Your talking as if the word reason and requirement are the same word. Well they aren't. 

There is a reason that segregation when it comes to gender is fine, but it isn't a requirement. 
There is no reason for segregation when it comes to race, and it isn't a requirement either. 

Like a whites only restaurant or drinking fountain? You remind me of that famous picture showing little kids in KKK hoods and robes. 
So white only dormitories would be racist, but black only dormitories isn't? Listen to yourself.
And don't hear what I'm not saying. We definitely shouldn't have white only things, but we shouldn't have black only things either. It goes both ways. 

You are living proof that white supremacy still exists in this country because white supremacy and ignorance go together like peas and carrots.
No you are living proof of ignorance in this country.