The libetarians don’t want reperations from previously stolen funds; they just want the theft to stop.
If someone stole money from you I’m pretty sure you’d want it back. And if you died I’m pretty sure you would want it given to your children. That’s basic morality and common sense.
Socialists tend to want this weird combination, where they want to pay back the hundreds of trillions of dollars that was legally stolen 200 years ago but they also want to increase the theft that happens today from the top 1%. It’s totally inconsistent.
It’s not a weird combination, these are two completely different things.
First of all, hundreds of trillions of dollars? You could at least pretend to be serious.
Second, it’s more than just slavery, it’s also Jim Crowe and segregation.
Third, taxation is not theft. This is a silly comparison. And even if I granted that it’s theft (which I most certainly don’t) it’s categorically different from what we did during slavery.
There’s nothing inconsistent about any of this.
BTW, giving every black person hundreds of millions of dollars for slavery is very ideologue and would make every black person rich and every white person millions of dollars in debt, so it’s a nonstarter.
I don’t know why you’re telling me this because I already made clear I do not support reparations. I’m just responding because your portrayal of the extreme wokists who advocate for this is a caricature. If you’re going to argue against a position you could at least get it right.
I know of no one who thinks every black person should be given hundreds of millions of dollars, and even of someone out there is arguing this that certainly isn’t the view point of 99% of the people advocating for it. You’re just concocting a cartoonis version of the other side so you can knock it down and sound legitimate. All that does is make you look ignorant.