A nice addition to DebateArt would be...

Author: Skipper_Sr

Posts

Total: 7
Skipper_Sr
Skipper_Sr's avatar
Debates: 10
Posts: 300
1
2
7
Skipper_Sr's avatar
Skipper_Sr
1
2
7
A nice addition to DebateArt would be to create a "random debate generator." This tool would be capable of creating spontaneous debate titles. If there are new users to the website or regulars that are lacking in creativity, this device would grant instant possibilities for debates
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
good luck with that.

Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@Skipper_Sr
Wrong. I can crush the average debate topic in a heartbeat due to how poorly-constructed they are. A debate topic cannot stand without definitions to aid it. I am sure Oro, Barney and RM would have the ability to do so too. This increases the chance of noobsniping.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,638
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Intelligence_06
"I am sure Oro, Barney and RM would have the ability to do so too. "
I like how you didnt mention Novice, who would abuse it the most.

Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 172
Posts: 3,946
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@Best.Korea
Yeah, he did too, one more factor on how the proposed idea is with flaw.

13 days later

PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
-->
@Skipper_Sr
I will see what I can do. Thank you for the suggestion 
Skipper_Sr
Skipper_Sr's avatar
Debates: 10
Posts: 300
1
2
7
Skipper_Sr's avatar
Skipper_Sr
1
2
7
-->
@Wylted
There is no need. Intelligence_06 outlined the critical flaws