Emergency Meep for election reform

Author: PREZ-HILTON

Posts

Total: 40
Topic's author
#1
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
This keep is simultaneously being proposed and voted on right now do to the pressing nature of the approaching election. Voting will end January 2nd at 5pm eastern time and is a simple yes or no proposition

FELLOW DARTers-

I hope everyone will participate by VOTING on the following two modest propositions:

PROPOSITION1:

The presidential election should have vote counting done by an independent panel chosen by popular vote which does not include anyone running for president currently and will consist of 3 vote counters. This will be effective immediately at the start of the current/next election

Vote yes or no

PROPOSITION2:

A supreme court should be formed in case there is a challenge to the results of an election, the supreme court will hold the vote counting panels accountable if there is a challenge to the results of the election and the supreme court will be picked by a representative of Airmax which will be the user known as ilikepie. 

YES or NO?

VOTING PROCEDURE:

  • VOTING will remain OPEN immediately 
  • One VOTE per PERSON, please.
    • Duplicate VOTES will be disregarded.
    • No requests to change VOTE after submission will be considered.
    • Any indication of multi-accounting will be referred to MODERATION
    • Please help promote voting clarity by limiting posts to VOTING ONLY using roughly this format:
      1. YES or NO
      2. YES or NO 
    • QUESTIONS/CONCERNS/DISCUSSION/ARGUMENT/CAMPAIGNING are all encouraged and may be posted to new forum threads started by interested parties. 
    • For either PROPOSITION, at least 10 users must have voted in the MEEP, and more than a majority of all those voting must have voted for the question or proposal.
      • That means, in practice, that in a MEEP with 10 total voters, the minimum threshold for a binding result is 7 votes in favor of the proposal or question    With 20 total voters, the minimum threshold for a binding result is 11.
      • If either PROPOSITION fails to produce a binding result, no change shall be requested.
      • If either PROPOSTION succeeds, I'll provide that result to DebateArt.com and the MODERATION TEAM requesting that change be completed before the END of 2022.
THANKS in ADVANCE for EVERYBODY's SINCERE and FRIENDLY PARTICIPATION!


Topic's author
#2
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
I vote yes on proposition number one and proposition number 2
#3
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,162
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
1. Yes 
2. Yes
Topic's author
#4
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
-->
@bestrsgoldfast
@badger
@Best.Korea
@Sir.Lancelot
Please vote
#5
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,638
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
Yes to PROPOSITION 1

Yes to PROPOSITION 2
#6
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,696
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
1. No
2. No
#7
YouFound_Lxam
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,182
3
4
7
YouFound_Lxam's avatar
YouFound_Lxam
3
4
7
1. Yes
2. Yes
#8
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,071
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
Are you taking the p**s.

Or just having a daft laugh.






Topic's author
#9
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
-->
@zedvictor4
This thread is for voting only
#10
Barney
Barney's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 3,463
5
9
10
Barney's avatar
Barney
5
9
10
No to both.

For the first, we'd be glad for volunteers to count the votes, but there is no benefit to the extra red tape proposed.

Likewise for second, just sounds like red tape to me.

This is much of why referendums usually go through a period of public review and feedback, before being put up for the vote.
#11
whiteflame
whiteflame's avatar
Debates: 27
Posts: 4,822
4
6
10
whiteflame's avatar
whiteflame
4
6
10
No on both.

Seems like this is built to make things unnecessarily difficult.
Topic's author
#12
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
-->
@whiteflame
Seems like this is built to make things unnecessarily difficult.
No, it is built to give me a path for victory

Likewise for second, just sounds like red tape to me.
See above statement, the red tape is very important.

#13
badger
badger's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,243
3
3
3
badger's avatar
badger
3
3
3
Two definite yeses. 
Topic's author
#14
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
Running tally

Prop 1

yes 5
No 3

Pron 2

Yes 5
No 3
#15
AustinL0926
AustinL0926's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 2,185
3
5
9
AustinL0926's avatar
AustinL0926
3
5
9
1. No
2. No

An incredible amount of bureaucracy for the purpose of basic arithmetic.
#16
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 15,162
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
Liberals opposing bureaucracy. That’s a first lol

#17
Vader
Vader's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 14,984
5
8
11
Vader's avatar
Vader
5
8
11
no to both

Moderation already has the authorities bestowed in this poll and is impartial in any way 

#18
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,597
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8

     1. No
     2. No

#19
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,071
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
1. No

2. No
#20
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
No to both because this particular role can't be trusted for the mods to privately count the votes and it's only the mods we should trust to be the vote counters.
#21
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,669
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
Man, you guys are really into the web site, I've just never seen a web site so foucused on it's own administration.

if I had to describe this web site I'd say it's a website that is about itself.

Plenty of trolls to make sure it's not a debate site...perhaps you should rename it TrollArt.
#22
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
A supreme court should be formed in case there is a challenge to the results of an election, the supreme court will hold the vote counting panels accountable if there is a challenge to the results of the election and the supreme court will be picked by a representative of Airmax which will be the user known as ilikepie. 

#23
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Sidewalker
please vote no to both if you care for justice on this website.

Most important to vote no to proposition 2.
#24
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
The second proposition makes it so that ilikepie5 will select the entire supreme court.

Please reconsider your vote.
Topic's author
#25
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
-->
@Vader
Moderation already has the authorities bestowed in this poll and is impartial in any way 
It's a check on moderation powers. Them counting votes also appeals about the vote count being the moderation is unfair. That essentially makes the moderation team- dictators. I would like that instead of whiteflame being Hitler. It's me. Just consider voting yes to proposition 2
#26
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,669
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
I vote no twice on P1 and three times on P2.
#27
SirAnonymous
SirAnonymous's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,140
3
7
10
SirAnonymous's avatar
SirAnonymous
3
7
10
No to both.
Topic's author
#28
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
-->
@SirAnonymous
WTF bro I helped you get 2nd place in survivor
#29
SirAnonymous
SirAnonymous's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,140
3
7
10
SirAnonymous's avatar
SirAnonymous
3
7
10
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
Third, but yes, and I greatly appreciated that. You helped me tremendously in that game. However, that does not mean that I have to agree with all of your ideas. I think these propositions would unnecessarily complicate things. All the voting is public, so I don't see how either of them are needed.
Topic's author
#30
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
-->
@SirAnonymous
Prop 2 is necessary. Airmax made a controversial decision on Stalin's vote which cost me an election with a one point margin. 

BSH1 was so upset about how close the election was that he refused to perform his presidential duties for 3 months