It appears that women played no part in inventing God's

It's hard to deny that men seemed to play the dominant role in spirituality in past generations but I doubt there weren't any God experienced women. I'm sure there were plenty of spiritual ladies just like there are now, but yeah it was the role of men in those days so you could argue the voice of the female was repressed/suppressed back then which may or may not have been natural as men do usually play the dominant role in societies, politics, business ect ect….and the further back you go the more extreme it was. But it wasn't just in religion it was just about in every aspect of old cultures. But as I said, you can't deny there were Theistic girls then or now, they are free to express their creative spiritual expressions and experiences/thoughts ect ect. It's no secret really the writers of classic religious texts were mainly men but I'm not sure if that should only be attributed to religion right? that's just how most cultures were. 

In ways we are anchored to religious scriptures of old because TBH people rarely except new revelations and sometimes for good reason but I've read some spiritual material from women that was pretty outstanding. They usually aren't the typical fundamentalist pew warmer though, more the free spirited hippie type. Even if you have a point here it's kinda washed up by the fact this role played out in all others ways of life when men dominated the religious arena as well as the world. Would it make a difference to ya if the Bible or any old scriptural text was written by female authors? 

Those verses are sometimes used to argue against christmas trees!

I explained my position quite clearly. I don't know what you mean by "invented" though, you mean they were suppressed? I agreed with that but I explained why and why it was common for the male role to dominate culture. That included scriptural texts, but this is why I added my second post. Behind all these men was a beautiful women rubbing their backs while they were meticulously jotting down spiritual writings lol. Yes the female role was certainly not the dominant gender throughout history, but do they need to be? 

Perhaps spiritual type people? TBH religions and spiritual texts are based on individual and collective observation/experiences. This is then collectively agreed upon and recorded for our convenience. But make no mistake about it, every ancient text will reflect its own culture to a degree we cannot escape that. And it was common for men to have control over every genre on life back then. 

Well there are many things within scriptures brother. You have culture, tradition, opinions, varying experiences ect ect but you also have universal spiritual principles which create the spiritual backdrop or foundation for the soul to connect with. All in all religions are a source that individuals can relate to and learn from. But each soul was meant to learn and experience for itself, sources are just foundations for learning. 

There were a number of female prophets in the Old and New Testament.

But it was not a worldly, spontaneous and natural ability for women to travel abroad, traversing and trekking – wandering alone through the deserts, wildernesses and throughout the dangerous mobs of men, to give the prophecy of God to very many people outside of their own close circle of friends and family. There were many sexist and prejudice people with preconceived judgments and opinions and there was a whole world that was filled with abusers who raped and manipulated and even kidnapped and sexually sold women in sex trades - the moment that a woman stepped outside of their circle of protection.

Female prophets in the Bible - were always used and valued in the role of working for God by staying in the in a safe environment - and God used the MALE prophets to go around the entire countryside, across deserts, through wildernesses and on long life adventures that include all the details in entire multiple book of the Bible - and to serve with Kings and leaders in a time of war and in dangerous situations where the males usually were situated and needed - and women did not serve in these capacities.

Also, we have the situation with the Trinitarian Translators who have changed much of the Bible. 

In 1Co 14:28 - it says, concerning speaking in tounges in the church - If there be no interpreter, - “ keep silence “ in the church; and speak to themselves and to God.  :29 Let the prophets speak two or three and let the other judge. - :30 If anything is revealed to another that sitteth by, let the first - - “ hold their peace. “

But the original does not say “ let the first - hold his peace - “ - verse :30 literally says - let the first - “ BE SILENT. “ / No Talking. This Greek word is “ SILENCE “ ... And verse :35 is totally mistranslated - it says - And if ( the women who are directly involved ) “ “ WILL OR WOULD “ “ A CERTAIN THING.. - let them ask their husbands IN the home - for it is a shame for women to say in the church. But this is only speaking of the situation directly involving church order that ALSO involves the MALES who are also commanded to be “ SILENT “

We see that the Translators had a wide spectrum of English words to use - and to alter the message with. - And they changed the part where it commands males to be silent and changed it to say that the males are only supposed to be HOLDING THEIR PEACE. But it says for all to keep silence in the church.

The one speaking in tongues, - is to “ KEEP SILENT “ when they are finished, while the prophecy of the interpreter is being spoken - this is Greek word that is used - Silence. Mouth shut or, do not be continuing to talk or make any further audible noise - whatsoever. – This word has nothing to do with “ Holding Your peace “ in the manuscripts in any way - ever.

There is nothing about the verse about anyone “ holding their peace_” this is another total mistruth - and this was inserted into the Translation in order to mold, codify and invent a deceptive theology by adding it along - with all of the other mistranslated words – to build the Trinitarian Organized Religiosity of a total perversion and alteration whereby they insert what the Trinitarian feels INSPIRED by His perverted sexist senses and what He feels ( pretends ) it should say – while pretending that the manuscripts are saying that the Male, afterward - is supposed to simply, just “ hold His peace “ While at the same time they all of a sudden - they go over and suddenly change the very exact same Greek word for “ Quiet or / HOLDING ONES PEACE “ - and they applied this same exact word - assilence - to the Female sex / woman, and they take this word “ Quietly / Quiet “ and again they suddenly veer sharply to the left and suddenly again change or add the word “ Quietly or Quiet - to be changed to the word “ silence “ - but, for the female sex.

In other words the same exact - actual literal Greek word for “ KEEPING SILENT “ does not really truly apply when it comes to the male sex – but it only applies strictly and only - when the Trinitarian comes to the female sex.

As we see - here in - 1Ti 2:11 Let the woman learn in “ Quietness “ with all subjection. As the verse says - women - who are ONLY in the setting, as described - of women simply being described as ( going through the learning process ) – and are to do it quietly and peacefully.  And Trinitarians, they invent a whole theology simply by changing / switching and re arranging words in deliberate dishonesty - and by inserting a theology that mandates “ ALL WOMAN “ are to remain forever in silence - when the context of 1Ti 2:11 - was specifically detailing the details of women who are learning - Let the woman learn in Quietness with all subjection. And, we easily notice - just - in just ten verses above here in 1Ti 2:2 - where it says “ that we may lead a solitary and - “ PEACEFUL “ life, in all godliness and honesty. -

They go ahead and use the word CORRECTELY translated as - - “ PEACEFUL / QUIET “ but they only use it situational, ONLY when it is not applied to the female sex. Again veering sharply to the right and suddenly radically changing this word “ PEACEFUL / QUIET “ which is the SAME exact word applied to women / females who are to commanded to be leaning in “ Quietness / PEACEFULNESS “ - with all subjection.

And they change it to say that women “ ALL WOMAN “ in all churches at all times are to be silent. No exceptions – no if’s – no and’s - and no but’s... They are switching out words and and re aranging the basic construct of the message - in order to INVENT a PRE CONCEIVED Church Doctrine that is found nowhere in the manuscripts.

In reality, in fact the entire and whole Trinitarian Translations is filled with nothing but countless switched out and transposed words - that never existed in the Original Manuscripts. This is everywhere in the translation.