Trump says Constitution can be terminated due to fraud

Author: SirAnonymous

Posts

Total: 65
Topic's author
#1
SirAnonymous
SirAnonymous's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,140
3
7
10
SirAnonymous's avatar
SirAnonymous
3
7
10
Full quote: 
So, with the revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION in working closely with Big Tech Companies, the DNC, & the Democrat Party, do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great “Founders” did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!

Trump is saying, clearly and unequivocally, that he thinks that the Constitution can be terminated due to election fraud. Straight from the horse's mouth.
#2
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@SirAnonymous
Right wing psychopath, dime a dozen, just louder than most.
#3
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,067
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@SirAnonymous
Stuff is terminatable.

Even Orange Clowns.
#4
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,972
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@SirAnonymous
There's only 2 ways I know of to do that. 2/3 majority of Congress or armed revolt.

Did Trump decide which path?









Topic's author
#5
SirAnonymous
SirAnonymous's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,140
3
7
10
SirAnonymous's avatar
SirAnonymous
3
7
10
-->
@Greyparrot
I don't think he thought that far ahead.
#6
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,972
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@SirAnonymous
lol
#7
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,638
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
Constitution? 

Well, I was always in favor of opposing to support a constitution.
Topic's author
#8
SirAnonymous
SirAnonymous's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,140
3
7
10
SirAnonymous's avatar
SirAnonymous
3
7
10
If the Republican Party nominates him after this, not to mention all the things before it, then it is truly lost. There is no conservative party in America.
#9
Barney
Barney's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 3,463
5
9
10
Barney's avatar
Barney
5
9
10
-->
@SirAnonymous
They set themselves firmly against conservative values when they nominated him to begin with. But at least they did them democratically, unlike the DNC.

tl;dr: both major parties suck.
Topic's author
#10
SirAnonymous
SirAnonymous's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,140
3
7
10
SirAnonymous's avatar
SirAnonymous
3
7
10
-->
@Barney
They set themselves firmly against conservative values when they nominated him to begin with.
True, but had they rejected him at some point along the way, they might have regained the slightest shred of credibility. If they nominate him in 2024, it will be a clear statement that there is no line they are unwilling to cross, and that they will support him even in the face of certain defeat. Not that that isn't pretty clear already...
But at least they did them democratically, unlike the DNC.
That has the odd implication that the Republican Party is more democratic that the Democratic Party. Meaningless, but funny.
tl;dr: both major parties suck.
I doubt you could find a single person who would disagree.
#11
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,638
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
Was a big high wall there that tried to stop me,

A sign was painted said: Private Property,

But on the back side it didn't say nothing ,

This land was made for you and me.


#12
Barney
Barney's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 3,463
5
9
10
Barney's avatar
Barney
5
9
10
-->
@SirAnonymous
But at least they did them democratically, unlike the DNC.
That has the odd implication that the Republican Party is more democratic that the Democratic Party. Meaningless, but funny.
As counterintuitive as it is, yes, they actually are.

For the RNC anyone registered as republican may vote for whomever they want in their primaries. That’s how we got Trump in 2016.

On paper the DNC has looks similar, except they have something called superdelegates who decide where the votes go regardless of which candidate was voted for. Which ironically is how we got Trump in 2016.
#13
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,669
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@Greyparrot
There's only 2 ways I know of to do that. 2/3 majority of Congress or armed revolt.

Did Trump decide which path?
Trump decided to go with armed revolt last Jan 6.
#14
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,972
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Sidewalker
Pretty sure the only armed people there were the only ones to kill a person on Jan 6.

It's probably more accurate to portray Jan 6 as armed suppression. It's not the 1st time the Government fired into crowds of protesters though (and easily got away with it.)

Won't be the last time either.
#15
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,067
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Greyparrot
Should have stayed at home.

Wouldn't have got shot.

Dumbass thought that Trump was the Orange God.

With his sidekick, boot polish head man.
#16
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,972
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
Should have stayed at home.

Wouldn't have got shot.
Yeah, that's what the Government said too when they got away with the Kent State shootings.

Lots of consolation for a free people, but you live in the land of force, so it's second nature for you to excuse such behavior.

#17
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,067
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Greyparrot
It's true though.

Should have stayed at home.

Wouldn't have got shot.

Dumbass thought that Trump was the Orange God.


Where or what is the land of force?

Whose behaviour have I excused.

And freedom is a hot potato.
#18
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 5,260
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@Greyparrot
It's probably more accurate to portray Jan 6 as armed suppression. It's not the 1st time the Government fired into crowds of protesters though (and easily got away with it.)
Do you believe the Capitol police have the right to secure the US Capitol from invaders, including stopping said invaders from attacking members of congress as they evacuate the building for their own safety?
#19
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,972
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
It's true though.

Should have stayed at home.

Wouldn't have got shot.

Dumbass thought that Trump was the Orange God.

And rape victims should have stayed at home too. Gotcha Mr. Authority apologist.

#20
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,972
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
Do you believe the Capitol police have the right to secure the US Capitol from invaders, including stopping said invaders from attacking members of congress as they evacuate the building for their own safety?
By shooting metal bullets into them? I guess it's acceptable now when it was not so much during the Kent State shootings.

Enjoy the dystopia.
#21
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,067
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Greyparrot
Let's be honest.

If they had stayed at home, sleepy Joe would have become President.

As it was, sleepy Joe became President.

There's a certain futility embedded in there somewhere.


And what the heck "Gotcha Mr. Authority apologist" means I do not know.

And I suspect that all rape victims would rather have been at home.

Though I doubt that most if not all rape victims did not set out to cause civil unrest for no good reason other than the ramblings of a mad miffed Orange Man.


And authority is a necessity of State.

Otherwise, there would be no authority.

And all sorts of people will do all sorts of things for no good reason other than having the freedom to do whatever they can think of next.

And wouldn't that be fun.


#22
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,972
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@zedvictor4
I guess the people's Congress should now put up a sign saying trespassers will be shot (and get away with it)

What a dystopian world
#23
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,067
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Greyparrot
Well, therein lies a separate discussion.

In so much as I'm not certain if dystopia is antonymous with utopia.

So for sure, I would not describe the human social world as utopic.

But neither would I say that losing an election will result in a dystopic society.

One might expect disappointment.

But when the losing group refuses to accept defeat and attempts to incite civil unrest.

Then one could then perhaps rightly envisage a dystopic outcome.


As for putting up signs saying trespassers will be shot.

Well, I have no knowledge of Federal or State trespass laws.

Though I am aware of the U.S.A 's dystopic gun laws.

But therein lies a separate discussion.


#24
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,972
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
As for putting up signs saying trespassers will be shot.

Well, I have no knowledge of Federal or State trespass laws.
There's no sign like that in the Capitol, yet it didn't stop armed government guards from firing metal bullets into a crowd.

#25
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,669
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@Greyparrot
As for putting up signs saying trespassers will be shot.

Well, I have no knowledge of Federal or State trespass laws.
There's no sign like that in the Capitol, yet it didn't stop armed government guards from firing metal bullets into a crowd.
A violent mob attacked the Capital in an attempt to kill the Speaker and Vice President....you think the police need a sign to defend our lawmakers?

How about if the situation was reversed, if a mob attacked Mar-A-Lago trying to kill your Orange Messiah, would the police be allowed to defend him without posting a sign?  Would the RNC declare it to be "Legitimate Political Discourse"?

Of course we know what would happen, all you whack jobs would cry like babies.
#26
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,972
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
you think the police need a sign to defend our lawmakers?
Apparently not. It's open season where the government can fire into an unarmed mob with metal bullets apparently.

Enjoy the dystopia.
#27
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
didn't stop armed government guards from firing metal bullets into a crowd.
Ok genius, bullets are made of lead. Sometimes they have a copper jacket or metal skin. 

#28
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,972
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
How about if the situation was reversed...

You mean if Trump ordered the police to fire metal bullets into a crowd? Well, maybe he could get away with it if he paid the media enough to spin a good yarn about it.


#29
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,972
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
Ok genius, bullets are made of lead. 
Ok genius, lead is a metal.
#30
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,669
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@Greyparrot
How about if the situation was reversed...

You mean if Trump ordered the police to fire metal bullets into a crowd? Well, maybe he could get away with it if he paid the media enough to spin a good yarn about it.
You guys cried like babies when they executed a search warrant at Mar-A-Lago, you cry when there is an unflattering article about the Orangeman, poor poor persecuted mob.