-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Since I understand string theory and I have access to Wikipedia, I would fill in 90 percent of the circle.
God only kicked them out of the Garden, because they disobeyed his one rule, and they had sin in their hearts. So, they could no longer be in his presence.
FU*K NO!
An astronomically small percentage barely worth noting.How could this possibly be used as proof of a God?
Imagine I draw a circle on a white board.The space inside the circle represents all knowledge.It contains Physics, Chemistry, etc.Even knowledge that we are still trying to find, exists in this circle.Now I ask you this question. If I gave you a pen, and asked you to fill in how much knowledge you think you have/know in the circle, how much of the circle would you fill in?Just answer me that.
Let me rephrase what the circle represents. The circle represents all knowledge. Everything that could ever be known about any subject. All the sciences, all the arts, etc. So, you guys put in a percent, that isn't fully 100%. So, you guys are admitting, that there are still things out there that you don't know. You just haven't discovered those things yet.Therefore, could God not exist, in a dimension, that you haven't discovered yet?Answer: Yes.
Is this your final proof
So, you guys are admitting, that there are still things out there that you don't know. You just haven't discovered those things yet.Therefore, could God not exist, in a dimension, that you haven't discovered yet?
Is it not possible that literally ANYTHING could exist in a dimension that's yet to be discovered? I presume you don't have the entire circle filled in either, right? So, let's try and see.Could a Priffleprimp exist in a dimension that hasn't been discovered yet?Also, your argument isn't for a capital G god. It's a terrible argument, but it's a terrible argument for Deism, not for any specific religion. Watch again:Could Zeus exist in a dimension you haven't discovered yet?
n your argument, there are only two options.1) God exists2) God doesnt exist
I have one question for all of you. Just answer this one question, and I will continue with my argument.Imagine I draw a circle on a white board.The space inside the circle represents all knowledge.It contains Physics, Chemistry, etc.Even knowledge that we are still trying to find, exists in this circle.Now I ask you this question. If I gave you a pen, and asked you to fill in how much knowledge you think you have/know in the circle, how much of the circle would you fill in?Just answer me that.
Therefore, could God not exist, in a dimension, that you haven't discovered yet?Answer: Yes.So, anyone who says they are an atheist, and agrees to this example, is not an atheist, but an agnostic.
I'm sorry, I didn't see your post on this. Same goes for yours though.
Yes. The circle argument is just to help prove a deistic belief. Not any in particular.
There is an infinite amount of knowledge that can be understoo
I am an agnostic atheist, other combinations are valid as well.
It's completely uncompelling, though. If some nameless being in a dimension we can't confirm exists decided to somehow 'start' the universe in a way that we can't describe, and it doesn't interact in any demonstrable way with reality...well what's the point of believing in it? And how, more importantly, do you get from this nameless entity to the god you believe in? That's the important part.
We believe it because we have faith in that possibility.
Just because you can't see something or its effect on you, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Almost think I agree here, as I can't see "gravity" or "time," but then I can demonstrate quite easily the existence of both.
The fact that we are here, is a demonstration of the existence of God.
how unlikely it is that random coincidences caused all of this to be precise enough for us to live in.
The only way this is possible is if there is more mass in the outer parts of galaxies than we can observe. The fact that we are unable to see this mass, because it is not emitting light, suggests the presence of dark matter.
Scientists discovered that the stars were not behaving in the way anticipated. They found that the stars farther away from the center were moving much faster than predicted. The only way this is possible is if there is more mass in the outer parts of galaxies than we can observe. The fact that we are unable to see this mass, because it is not emitting light, suggests the presence of god, holding it together via divine will.