If you want to debate me, make a list of topics you want to debate and challenge me, I mainly enjoy doing philosophy/religion, but I can do scientific/political too
Debate Me
Posts
Total:
18
I might do one final debate before permanently quitting the site. It will be a devil's advocate position for abortion.
Maybe Ii will do a small series. But I will take the liberal position on all topics. It will be to prove two things.
The liberal position when from the point of view of the elitests behind closed doors who influence the midwits and idiots of the left have a philosophical position that is both evil and unassailable.
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
I might do one final debate before permanently quitting the site. It will be a devil's advocate position for abortion.
I'm assuming devil's advocate being Pro-Choice? I'm down to do Pro-Life
-->
@That2User
Yes me as pro choice. I work 60 hours a week so I can either do a live debate on a Saturday or need 1 week argument time.
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
Yes me as pro choice. I work 60 hours a week so I can either do a live debate on a Saturday or need 1 week argument time.
1 week it is
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
Why quit?
Your input is valid no matter how casually you use the site.
-->
@zedvictor4
Why quit?Your input is valid no matter how casually you use the site.
Because I seek to go to war with myself. To harden my mind and focus on a sole purpose so I can achieve some things I could not achieve otherwise.
Everyday I come on this site is a day I lost a battle with my own mind. I am going to get stronger until I can defeat it.
I probably won't debate again, but I will stay here until I finish a few things.
I will say as long as the site helps me harden myself a bit, I will probably have less excuses to come on.
For example right now I am trying to choose kinder words. I fucked up just now though because I have a hard time not telling stupid people they are stupid.
It really isn't their fault they are stupid though, and me telling them something they probably already know isn't going to help them . If you are curious it was the Roosevelt guy.
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
The way to defeat others you think are stupid is to ignore them and be content with your own thoughts.
Anything Marvel, DC related. -
Character Preferences:
- Punisher
- Batman
- Spiderman
- Green Arrow
Topic Suggestions
- Punisher is more moral than Batman.
- The MCU Multi-verse crossover is a mistake.
- The Amazing Spiderman franchise should make a sequel.
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
You might enjoy reading this ultimately unused debate setup and R1:
-->
@That2User
"Capitalism is inherently exploitative"
-->
@Sum1hugme
"Capitalism is inherently exploitative"
Which side you on?
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
Topic Suggestions
- Punisher is more moral than Batman.
I can do "Batman has a moral imperative to kill the Joker"
-->
@That2User
Oh gosh, I still remember the time Nightwing killed the clown, and Batman used his magical powers to bring him back to life...
-->
@That2User
I will accept almost any casual or troll topic that has actual room for debate.
It could be comic-related.
-->
@That2User
I can do "Batman has a moral imperative to kill the Joker"
You would be wrong though. For several reasons.
From consequentialism which is what you will likely argue looking something like this
" Batman allowing joker to live causes more people to die in the world"
Con
" Batman is what as known as hypersane and realizes he is in a comic book. Without being the archetypal villain, the comic book series would end and his universe would be destroyed"
-->
@Wylted
@Barney
@That2User
"You might enjoy reading this ultimately unused debate setup and R1:
Thanks for the link, Barney. I will check it out later. Very fascinating stuff.
"I can do "Batman has a moral imperative to kill the Joker""
I like that prompt. It's settled then.
"Batman is what as known as hypersane and realizes he is in a comic book. Without being the archetypal villain, the comic book series would end and his universe would be destroyed"
It's not an unreasonable position to assume, but it feels like adding variables to a hypothetical where it doesn't belong. Like the debate equivalent of meta-gaming. I prefer to argue within the context of the characters being completely unaware that they are a product of fiction.
-->
@That2User
Pro