Democrats blow whistle on fraudulent ballot harvesting...
Posts
Total:
11
This is not even possible. It is literally impossible not only for their to ever be a single incidence of voter fraud but for machines to ever be imperfect and fail to count perfectly every time.
The system is perfect and conservatives wanting to improve the system are being stupid because you cannot improve on perfect
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
Of course which is why it's laughable to even question an election outcome these days.
-->
@Greyparrot
Of course which is why it's laughable to even question an election outcome these days
I am so confident in the perfection of the election process that I think we should get rid of the electoral system. A close national vote will have perfect count. There will never be an incidents were severally understaffed volunteers counting votes will need to recount an entire nations votes in a close election.
Thank God it is perfect also. Recounting 150 million votes would be a pain in the ass, but luckily if it ever happened every single poll worker is above politics and not passionate about the future of the country, so they can be depended on to count perfectly.
Don't forget about the science of the voting process. The consensus says elections are always perfect, so anyone who disagrees is a science-denier!
CISA is the most reputable cybersecurity department in the entire universe. Even aliens can't compete with CISA. CISA's skills are so advanced that our own government's election interference equipment doesn't stand a chance! And CISA says the election was secure. All hail CISA and their security ability!
Let's go lock up those Trump supporter bigots now for questioning our perfect election.
C'mon, you guys know it isn't perfect, we could add violence, suppression, and intimidation to the process to make it better, and top it off with an insurrection if we don't like the outcome, now that would make it perfect.
-->
@Sidewalker
suppression
We definitely don't want to suppress low IQ people from voting who are in no way qualified to make policy decisions.
That's why I always advertise to 18 year olds with rock the vote campaigns
If we don't get the uneducated and disinterested voters to vote, then people with high IQs in ivory towers who need to touch grass will get to make their decisions for them, and there is no way those out of touch voters who care about and educate themselves on politics are in any type of position to tell the young disinterested voters that they know what is better for them.
People that get their news off tik tok should definitely have a huge impact on the elections.
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
well said
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
suppressionWe definitely don't want to suppress low IQ people from voting who are in no way qualified to make policy decisions.
No, you just want to elect low IQ people who are in no way qualified to make policy decisions.
That's why I always advertise to 18 year olds with rock the vote campaignsIf we don't get the uneducated and disinterested voters to vote, then people with high IQs in ivory towers who need to touch grass will get to make their decisions for them, and there is no way those out of touch voters who care about and educate themselves on politics are in any type of position to tell the young disinterested voters that they know what is better for them.
That, or we could get disinterested and uninformed voters to become interested and informed.
People that get their news off tik tok should definitely have a huge impact on the elections.
So this is your argument for why we should dispense with our democratic system, you are afraid of young people, that's not terribly convincing.
-->
@Sidewalker
So this is your argument for why we should dispense with our democratic system, you are afraid of young people, that's not terribly convincing.
A lot of young people are really intelligent and can be well read as well.
No, you just want to elect low IQ people who are in no way qualified to make policy decisions.
We have 2 scenarios, tell me which one is more likely to result in high quality candidates winning office
1. Disinterested low information people being harassed into voting
2. People who are passionate about policies and are well read high information people vote without having their votes erased by low information voters.
That, or we could get disinterested and uninformed voters to become interested and informed.
Yeah we have 2 options here as you highlighted. Live and let live or guilt people who could give a shit less about policy decisions into voting for policy makers they could care less in informing themselves about.
So I completely agree those 2 options exist