-->
@Public-Choice
No. Because that wasn't what Trump was talking about and also because I am not stupid…
Two more lies
When will the Capitol burn?
Posts
Total:
59
-->
@Public-Choice
Further, on the UV light comment, that is actually a commonly-practiced method of sanitation for surfaces, water, and air. The concentrated UV light has been shown in multiple studies to kill harmful germs, viruses, and bacteria.
Ya, and Trump the dummy thinks we could use UV light to fight the Covid virus IN THE BODY. Since you’re a dummy too, you probably thought this was a great idea by Trump.
They believed they finally had a sympathizer in the White House and an administration that would enact policies to match their anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim and racist ideas,” the report stated.
Islam is itself a fascist religion both theologically and politically via Sharia. So, Nazis being anti-Islam benefits the stupidly naive left wing who openly embrace the religion without knowing its teachings, roots and nature once it starts to spread within a culture.
I took the time and effort to study Islam to prove Islamophobes wrong, all I ended up realising is that there is plenty to be phobic about if one is a left-wing progressive that wants liberty and democracy in their culture and nation.
Not all immigrants and certainly not all cultures (with their ideologies attached) are good for a nation, many come from highly fascistic conservative cultures, if any side should believe in well screened immigration more than the other, it should be the left wing.
We can agree that if I said these things irl or online with my full name etc attached right here, I would be a cancelled popsicle melting under the ire of cancel culture. That has nothing to do with left or right wing politics and everything to do with irrational tyranny fearing a voice of reason and bravery.
-->
@Public-Choice
I also took multiple other IQ tests online about a month ago and scored between 120-165. So I am definitely not stupid by any means.
Is that what your mother tells you?
Believe me, I haven’t seen anything on this site that would indicate anything other than you being a moron.
The sources you use are for morons. (Handed) When you do use a reputable source like Wikipedia you distort or misunderstand the information presented.
-->
@Public-Choice
Roose is clearly on his 8th booster.
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Don’t be an idiot.
Said someone who said this after I have well stated my view. If you think I am wrong, do better, don’t just call me an idiot. Show us how I am wrong.
Otherwise, your behavior make you look more like an idiot possibly every time you restate it.
-->
@Public-Choice
Like most liberals you have once again proven to have no idea what you're talking about.
No, Trump supporters, including yourself, are stupid. We see it every day. Have you ever watched an interview of a Trump supporter at one of the Trump rallies? All dummies. They are usually fat. They wear ball caps and usually have a southern accent. They are typically bearded, their preferred mode of transportation is a pickup truck, the bigger the better. These are stupid, stupid people.
-->
@Intelligence_06
Said someone who said this after I have well stated my view. If you think I am wrong, do better, don’t just call me an idiot. Show us how I am wrong.Otherwise, your behavior make you look more like an idiot possibly every time you restate it.
what can I say. You said the Capitol building can’t be burned. It has been burned. It can be burned again. Leaving the outer stone shell doesn’t mean the Capitol building wasn’t burned. You well stated your view? You think?
Here you go genius. Your wrong. You should have learned this in the fifth grade. This is from the website Senate.gov.
Burning of Washington, 1814
[U.S. Capitol after burning by the British]
On August 24, 1814, as the War of 1812 raged on, invading British troops marched into Washington and set fire to the U.S. Capitol, the President's Mansion, and other local landmarks. The ensuing fire reduced all but one of the capital city's major public buildings to smoking rubble, and only a torrential rainstorm saved the Capitol from complete destruction. The blaze particularly devastated the Capitol's Senate wing, the oldest part of the building, which was honeycombed with vulnerable wooden floors and housed the valuable but combustible collection of books and manuscripts of the Library of Congress, then located in the Capitol building. Heat from the intense fire reduced the Senate chamber's marble columns to lime, leaving the room, in one description, "a most magnificent ruin." Quickly, President James Madison arranged for Congress to meet temporarily at Blodgett's Hotel when it returned to session in September, and the business of Congress continued uninterrupted. The following year, the Senate moved to the Brick Capitol, a large red-brick structure built to accommodate Congress temporarily. Not until 1819, after a major reconstruction project, did the Senate again meet in the historic Old Senate Chamber in the U.S. Capitol
Antifa burned down more government buildings than the Proud Boys.
Fact checked true.
-->
@ILikePie5
All dummies. They are usually fat. They wear ball caps and usually have a southern accent.
Listen fat...
-->
@Greyparrot
I identify as a deplorable sir
-->
@ILikePie5
I identify as a deplorable sir
Yes you do. Trump made racism popular again.
Lmfaooo
-->
@RationalMadman
“Democracy has become a weapon of moneyed interests. It uses the media to create the illusion that there is consent from the governed. The press today is an army with carefully organized weapons, the journalists its officers, the readers its soldiers. The reader neither knows nor is supposed to know the purposes for which he is used and the role he is to play. The notion of democracy is often no different than living under a plutocracy or a government by wealthy elites.”
― Oswald Spengler
Did you drink Clorox to clean the body after Trump suggested it? Or shine bright lights into the body to give it a cleansing?
Nah, I listened to Oscar the Grouch and Big Bird to get my 8th booster.
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
All dummies. They are usually fat. They wear ball caps and usually have a southern accent. They are typically bearded, their preferred mode of transportation is a pickup truck, the bigger the better.
I'm waiting to see how any of the qualities you've listed have any hearing on a person's Intelligence Quotient.
Also, I was born in New York, grew up in Northern Virginia, was raised by two parents with advanced degrees, attended top-tier private schools, took advanced classes in High School, and would have graduated with a double major in College had I decided to stay one additional semester rather than start my working career.
And I'm a Trump Supporter. The only ignoramus in this conversation is you. But the solution is rather simple. Stop reading newspapers and news magazines (the lowest forms of printed intellectual content) and start reading books and begin thinking for yourself. That is better than all the education in the world.
-->
@Public-Choice
I'm waiting to see how any of the qualities you've listed have any hearing on a person's Intelligence Quotient.
Any hearing? Really?
-->
@Public-Choice
And I'm a Trump Supporter
Then you are either a dummy or a racist. Which is it?
Do you like Trump’s lies, subversion, racism, incompetence or ignorance?
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Well, I work for Chinese immigrants and live in a city with 50% black people and am in a biracial relationship.
So it clearly can't possibly be racism. And we already know it isn't being stupid because of my professionally tested IQ of 144 and my advanced education and educated upbringing. Heck, I also scored an 1800 on the SATs on my first try when the average score was 1500 and 1700 was considered good enough to be seriously considered by most colleges without a transcript.
So maybe you are the dummy or racist in this scenario? Because it clearly isn't me.
-->
@Public-Choice
Then why do you say such stupid things and support fat Trump the racist?
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
For starters, your replies to my sources were incredulously cherry picked and also show your desperate attempt to just be right even when the facts go against you.
For one, there were Federal Regulations with the first Polio vaccine, as this 1994 study meticulously proves:
IPV was developed in 1953 by Jonas Salk (Salk, 1953; Salk et al., 1953); OPV was developed by Koprowski and colleagues (1952), who were the first to use it, and Albert Sabin (1956). An enhanced-potency IPV was developed in the late 1970s and is used today. Currently, IPV and the Sabin strains of OPV are available for use in the United States; however, OPV is the vaccine recommended for general use and is the most prevalent (American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Infectious Diseases, 1991).Shortly after the licensure of IPV in 1955, the vaccine manufactured by Cutter was found to cause paralytic disease. It contained residual infectious virus. The reason was traced to the method of inactivation. At that time the dynamics of the inactivation process were not fully understood, and the U.S. government's requirements for vaccine production were ambiguous. All of these problems have since been corrected.
Those specific problems were corrected, but it did not, by any means, stop unsafe vaccines from going to market. As the CDC documents, the problem persisted clear into 2013, and this is just what the CDC has admitted. There's others they have not:
Moreover, if you had bothered to read futher down in the Wikipedia article (past the paltry two paragraphs that agreed with you out of context) you would have read:
The NSV was the second largest Nazi group organization by 1935, second only to the German Labour Front. It had 4.7 million members and 520,000 volunteer workers. Nazi Party members who were active in communal welfare professionally or as volunteers had to be NSV members.[8]
Moreover, if you look at the groups the Nazis cancelled, you'll find they were all PRIVATE WELFARE INSTITUTIONS:
Before the Nazi seizure of power, there had been seven main charitable networks in Germany: two socialist welfare organizations (one run by the SPD and the other by the KPD), the Christian workers' welfare association, the national Jewish charitable agency, the Roman Catholic Caritas, the Protestant Inner Mission, and the German Red Cross. The Nazis disbanded the socialist and Christian workers' associations and seized their assets, restricted the activities of the Jewish agency to helping ethnic Jews, and sought to "coordinate" the remaining three agencies under the control of the NSV.[6] The non-Nazi charities were forced to accept the principles of eugenics and refrain from helping those deemed biologically unfit, while the German Red Cross was compelled to appoint Nazis to prominent positions.[7]
That is nothing remotely close to your argument that the Nazis had no welfare department. It was their second biggest department and they monopolized the industry. Exactly like what liberals want to do.
Also, I'll assume the Roosevelt you want is FDR, the man who literally imprisoned Japanese Americans and Italian Americans and had the same nazi-style crackdown on "dissenters" that Hitler had in Germany. I really hope I'm wrong, but you sure don't sound like you'd support Teddy Roosevelt from what I've read thus far.
Do you really wanna keep doing this? Or have I made my point?
-->
@Public-Choice
The polio vaccine, including the one the you referred to happened way before 1955.
That is nothing remotely close to your argument that the Nazis had no welfare department.
The Nazis were not in support of welfare, which was your claim. They later decided it was politically untenable to not have any welfare (for certain people) and they discovered they could use welfare as a weapon by denying it to undesirables.
But it’s good that you are reading and from a credible source even. This is real progress for a Republican. I’m glad and give myself credit for steering you away from the rabbit holes.
-->
@Public-Choice
Also, I'll assume the Roosevelt you want is FDR, the man who literally imprisoned Japanese Americans and Italian Americans and had the same nazi-style crackdown on "dissenters" that Hitler had in Germany.
Oh ya FDR was terrible. That’s why he was elected 4 times. Trump? Just once, a loser for losers.
The Japanese internment was obviously a gross miscarriage of justice… that was upheld by the Supreme Court and had very little opposition from white America. What did your grandparents do about this miscarriage of justice? Anything? I didn’t think so. And Republicans would be the sort to not learn from that mistake and do it again in the future. Because they are dummies. Case in point - the way Trump tried to discourage immigrants and asylum seekers by separating children from their parents at the border. A crime worse than the internment camps.
Crackdown on dissenters? What nonsense are you talking about now? Now I remember a Nazi-style crackdown in DC just a couple years ago by Trump so he could hold a Bible upside down in front of a church. Do you recall that?
-->
@Public-Choice
Or have I made my point?
I don’t think you have made a valid point in your life. You and your stupid IQ score.
Oh ya FDR was terrible. That’s why he was elected 4 times.
So terrible, Congress mandated term limits so there would be no repeat disaster.
But he died, and the economy recovered soon after.
So terrible, Congress mandated term limits so there would be no repeat disaster. But he died, and the economy recovered soon after.
That doesn’t change the fact that Americans elected him 4 times. So I guess he was popular unlike one-term Trump.
The economy recovered during FDR’s time. The war resulted in massive government spending. Unemployment was low and business was booming when he died.
@RationalMadman,
Islam is itself a fascist religion both theologically and politically via Sharia.
- Everybody seems to use that word these days, kinda makes you wonder. What does fascist exactly mean to you?
So, Nazis being anti-Islam benefits the stupidly naive left wing who openly embrace the religion without knowing its teachings, roots and nature once it starts to spread within a culture.
- I reckon knowing the thing is a prerequisite to embracing it. I don't think the 'stupidly naive left wing' will still be adopting LGBT+Feminism & all the other nonsense if they were, as you claim, openly embracing Islam... Try to be consistent.
I took the time and effort to study Islam to prove Islamophobes wrong,
- Why is this not believable...
all I ended up realising is that there is plenty to be phobic about if one is a left-wing progressive that wants liberty and democracy in their culture and nation.
- You go girl. Do absolutely not abandon that Liberty & Democracy of yours, lest others may find it more difficult to overpower you.
Not all immigrants and certainly not all cultures (with their ideologies attached) are good for a nation, many come from highly fascistic conservative cultures, if any side should believe in well screened immigration more than the other, it should be the left wing.
- By all means, please do. You shouldn't have any conservative nonsense in your nations. We want a 100% queer West.
We can agree that if I said these things irl or online with my full name etc attached right here, I would be a cancelled popsicle melting under the ire of cancel culture. That has nothing to do with left or right wing politics and everything to do with irrational tyranny fearing a voice of reason and bravery.
- How come you are defending the very thing for lack of the very thing that you are accusing others of... This 'left wing' thing looks pretty 'fascist' to me...
-->
@Yassine
@RationalMadman,Islam is itself a fascist religion both theologically and politically via Sharia.- Everybody seems to use that word these days, kinda makes you wonder. What does fascist exactly mean to you?
Definition of fascism1often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition2: a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control
The term "Islamofascism" is defined in the New Oxford American Dictionary as "a term equating some modern Islamic movements with the European fascist movements of the early twentieth century".[3]
The earliest known use of the contiguous term Islamic Fascism dates to 1933 when Akhtar Ḥusayn Rā’ēpūrī, in an attack on Muḥammad Iqbāl, defined attempts to secure the independence of Pakistan as a form of Islamic fascism.[4] Some analysts consider Manfred Halpern's use of the phrase 'neo-Islamic totalitarianism' in his 1963 book The Politics of Social Change in the Middle East and North Africa, as a precursor to the concept of Islamofascism, in that he discusses Islamism as a new kind of fascism.[5] Halpern's primary case was based on an analysis of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and he argued that such Islamic movements were an obstacle to the military regimes who were in his view representatives of a new middle class capable of modernizing the Middle East.[6][7] Halpern's work, commissioned by the United States Air Force from the Rand Corporation, arguably represents a mix of mid-Cold War analysis and orientalism.[8]
In 1978, Maxime Rodinson, a distinguished Marxist scholar of Islam, responded to French avant-garde enthusiasm for Khomeini's revolution in a three part article in Le Monde, by arguing that, in response to successive assaults by Crusaders, Mongols, Turks and Western imperialism, Islamic countries had come to feel embattled, and the impoverished masses had come to think of their elites, linked to foreigners, as devoid of traditional piety. Both nationalism and socialism imported from the West were recast in religious terms, in a process of political Islamicization which would be devoid of the progressive side of nationalism and revert to what he called "a type of archaic fascism" characterized by policing the state to enforce a totalitarian moral and social order.[9]
So, Nazis being anti-Islam benefits the stupidly naive left wing who openly embrace the religion without knowing its teachings, roots and nature once it starts to spread within a culture.- I reckon knowing the thing is a prerequisite to embracing it. I don't think the 'stupidly naive left wing' will still be adopting LGBT+Feminism & all the other nonsense if they were, as you claim, openly embracing Islam... Try to be consistent.
I actually agree with you there, they have no idea what it is they are claiming to welcome and embrace. If they did, they'd reject it immediately.
I took the time and effort to study Islam to prove Islamophobes wrong,- Why is this not believable...
I don't know but then again you blindly believe in a book written in times of extreme ignorance founded by a narcissistic sociopath who even had pedophilic tendencies.
all I ended up realising is that there is plenty to be phobic about if one is a left-wing progressive that wants liberty and democracy in their culture and nation.- You go girl. Do absolutely not abandon that Liberty & Democracy of yours, lest others may find it more difficult to overpower you.
This reply doesn't necessiate a rebuttal, it is not an argument or a question.
Not all immigrants and certainly not all cultures (with their ideologies attached) are good for a nation, many come from highly fascistic conservative cultures, if any side should believe in well screened immigration more than the other, it should be the left wing.- By all means, please do. You shouldn't have any conservative nonsense in your nations. We want a 100% queer West.
Just like your nations and cultures aim for extremely fascist conservatism, those of the West you detest are aiming for a tolerant and progressive society. In the end the friction and tolerance can only last until there's a severe push and it is reasonable to fear Islam's spread, they are very rapid at spreading their ideology and very good at blackmailing people to stay within the ethnic group even if they secretly disagree or doubt.
We can agree that if I said these things irl or online with my full name etc attached right here, I would be a cancelled popsicle melting under the ire of cancel culture. That has nothing to do with left or right wing politics and everything to do with irrational tyranny fearing a voice of reason and bravery.- How come you are defending the very thing for lack of the very thing that you are accusing others of... This 'left wing' thing looks pretty 'fascist' to me...
I am agreeing with you, cancel culture is pretty fascistic. The difference is that it generally is done by the society rather than the government.
RationalMadman,Islam is itself a fascist religion both theologically and politically via Sharia.- Everybody seems to use that word these days, kinda makes you wonder. What does fascist exactly mean to you?
- Let's see...
Definition of fascism1often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual
- No. God above all else.
and that stands for a centralized autocratic government
- No again. Islamic rulership is community-based, it's anti-centralized by design.
headed by a dictatorial leader,
- More Nos. In an Islamic government, the leader is expected to abide by the prophetic law, like all his Muslim subjects.
severe economic and social regimentation,
- Nah. Islamic government is limited government, since, again, rulership is community based. The bulk of the burden is taken by the individual, then his family, then his community & so on, up to the government level.
and forcible suppression of opposition
- Nope. Islamic system is community based, by design all & each community must have representation, unlike the sh*t style government of the West that is majority based, where minorities are necessarily at the mercy of the majority.
The term "Islamofascism" is defined in the New Oxford American Dictionary as "a term equating some modern Islamic movements with the European fascist movements of the early twentieth century".[3]
- This is why you are confused. This is all yours buddy. What you like to think is "Islamic" government is merely Western style government of one form or another imported into or imposed onto Muslim societies, admittedly so by the very article you're citing. When I think of Islamic state I think of the many dozens (even hundreds) actual mainstream Sunni states across Muslim history, especially the major empires, like the Umayyads or the Abbasids, the Ottomans & so on...
I actually agree with you there, they have no idea what it is they are claiming to welcome and embrace. If they did, they'd reject it immediately.
- Nothing is being embraced or welcomed. Liberals never welcomed Islam or actual Muslims, they welcome other liberals like themselves who happen to identify as Muslim.
I don't know but then again you blindly believe in a book written in times of extreme ignorance founded by a narcissistic sociopath who even had pedophilic tendencies.
- I don't actually believe in such stupid things written by your ignorant sociopathic narcissistic founding fathers... maybe you do though!
This reply doesn't necessiate a rebuttal, it is not an argument or a question.
- I was agreeing with you ...
Just like your nations and cultures aim for extremely fascist conservatism, those of the West you detest are aiming for a tolerant and progressive society.
- The only "tolerance" the West offer is for degeneracy, & absolutely nothing else. The modern liberal western secular nation-state is the most expansive dictatorial intolerant fascist that has ever existed in History. Your life since your birth in virtually all its aspects, is regulated by the state. Your education, learning, health, food, movement, money, finances, business, charity...etc, are regulated by the state, if not then monitored or at the very least accessible. But you are free to chose your pronouns & be as much degenerate as you want -allegedly... (expect all the degenerate ways we find distasteful at the moment...). What you don't seem to get is that your nonsense culture is unsustainable, breakdown of Family values means inevitable extinction. Our "conservatism" is everlasting. So, we won't be seeing you for long anyways. On that note, the Islamic system is much more tolerant in all the above except in public degeneracy. We believe those who pay your expenses & feed you are responsible for your education & rearing, i.e. parents must teach & raise their kids as they see fit, not the effing state. We believe people have a right to decide who or what received their tax money, not the state. We believe the people have a right to chose their own contracts, they own form of currency & manage their own money...etc.
In the end the friction and tolerance can only last until there's a severe push and it is reasonable to fear Islam's spread,
- Obviously. With your unbearable intolerance, it gotta stop some day.
they are very rapid at spreading their ideology and very good at blackmailing people to stay within the ethnic group even if they secretly disagree or doubt.
- Indeed, I know. They start by mass indoctrinating your children, by abduction if need be, to their degenerate ideologies. It gets easier to punish dissent after that.
I am agreeing with you, cancel culture is pretty fascistic. The difference is that it generally is done by the society rather than the government.
- Idk about that... try a couple of things & see where you end up.